Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can I Get Diagnosed After 2 Years Gluten Free?


Tom15034

Recommended Posts

Tom15034 Newbie

Is it possible to get diagonsed with celiacs disease after being off wheat for about 1-1/2 years? Although I had an immediate black and white 100% improvement the day I quite eating wheat, I have never been diagnosed as as intolerant. After many years, I had gotten used to the burning gut after every meal and the abnormal bm's. Then I read about a celiac that had my simptoms and I tried it and the rest is history. Been a new man ever since! The medical experts I went to for years totally missed it. (What are they teaching these guys and gals?)

I have now found a GI doctor willing to do the biopsy of the small bowel. Is it too late to get a good test? If my cilli or whatever all healed back, my biopsy sample may look like a normal guys?

Tom


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

You can NOT get an accurate biopsy now...your villi in your intestines would be healed.If you have been gluten free for a year and a half you can not get an accurate blood test or biopsy.

Another test you might want to consider is an Enterolab. www.enterolab.com

They do not require you to get back on gluten unless you have been off of gluten more then 2 years I think it is...you can learn more about it on their website. This is a good test but not widely accepted by the medical community.

That is pretty much one of your only options unless you would like to get back on gluten.

You mentioned you have been off of wheat...have you been off rye,barley,and oats as well? With celiac you have to avoid not just wheat but those as well.

Lesliean Apprentice

My blood work was negative (not the whole panel though) after just 3 weeks gluten-free. I was not going to eat gluten for 3 months to get a positive biopsy. And a lot of gluten sensitive/Celiacs are negative on the biopsy. I have complete confidence in Enterolab. They say the testing will come back positive within the first 2 years and if it comes back negative to consider a gluten challenge. Check out there website at www.enterolab.com.

Tom15034 Newbie

Thanks for the replies.

I have been off everything that contains gluten. Maybe one reason to get a biopsy would be to see if I do have villi, I mean, to make sure they grew back.

I will check out Enterolab.

Thanks

Tom

FaithInScienceToo Contributor

Hi, Tom,

May I ask you why you are seeing a GI doc at this point in time? Are you having other GI symptoms that did not go away with the gluten-free diet?

Gina

  • 1 month later...
Tom15034 Newbie

Thanks for the replys!

Gina, to answer your question, I am seeing a GI doc because I can't sleep flat or I wake up with a stomach ache in an hour or two. An endoscopy showed a sliding hiatial hernia. I am trying to get that fixed surgically.

The reasons to get diagnosed gluten sensitive at this late date:

1. Wheat free is no easy diet. Why do it if I am not a celiac?

2. If I am, my kids should be tested and possibly other relatives.

3. If I am intolerant. maybe I am getting poisned occasionally.

Some examples of getting poisoned: (1) I travel to Mexico. Try asking the waitress what foods are wheat-free when she can't understand english and I don't speak spanish. (2) I bought and ate wheat-free fig newtons. After eating a handfull I read the lable and find they had barley flour as the main ingredient.

Tom

celiac3270 Collaborator

My answer to the first one would be that if you feel better without gluten, then that's raeson enough to be gluten-free...many here don't have a formal diagnosis.

The second reason makes sense, but with 1/133 having celiac in the first place, I think everyone should be tested regardless...celiac is too common and has such powerful long-term adverse effects NOT to be tested--regardless of symptoms or lack thereof. With the third, it basically comes down to how willing you are to be painstakingly careful about this--if you'd do it without knowing for sure, diagnosis isn't necessary, if you'd rather know for sure, then testing would probably be better.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ddeatley Newbie

Tom,

Some recommend doing a gluten challenge for approximately six weeks prior to doing a biopsy, but I find it difficult to purposely do damage to yourself just for the test. If you have had celiac disease for quite sometime, and if it has been severe. being gluten-free for that long would allow your villi to recover, however adults don't always recover 100% of their villi when they go gluten-free. So there may be some benefit to the biopsy anyway. The issue about your children is an important one, however I would suggest that you get a Celiac Panel or a genetic test on them first before subjecting them to a biopsy. That may be all that is needed. Certainly consult with your GI doctor first. I have been fortunate to have a really good one, and while he didn't diagnose me three years ago, this year he was much more informed about it than ever.

I too have a hiatal hernia, although not enough to need surgical intervention. That may very well be the cause of your heartburn and you should notice relief once the surgery is done. good luck with everything

Dennis

jknnej Collaborator

I'm having my biospy after 6 months gluten-free and my GI doc, who was voted best GI doctor in Phoenix, is OK doing it.

But he is also testing for H.Pylori and reflux b/c I have those symptoms as well.

But he said he will take several samples from my small intestines to test for celiac disease.

He also believes, though, from my blood that I do not have celiac disease.

I will still be gluten-free b/c I feel a LOT better than before.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.