Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Reasons


countryfairy

Recommended Posts

countryfairy Newbie

A few years ago, I was diagnosed with celiac. I never really thought I had it. I now have a chance to prove myself right. This Thursday I have an appointment with my gastrointerologist, and I am going to suggest the test that is quite popular, from what I have heard. Apparently you go off the diet and eat whatever you want for six months, when you go back and get another endoscapy (sorry about spelling) to confirm the diagnosis. By the way, I am 14 and under parental domination. Well, I always try to be prepared. My father wants to try it, my mother does not. And my doctor may try to discourage it. So I want to know all the reasons for and against this procedure so, if necessary, I can talk my way into getting it done. So if any of you know anything about it (and aren't wondering about my mental health by now!) please tell me what I should be prepared for (both sides of it so I can come up with counterarguments). Thanks in advance,

Paige


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



countryfairy Newbie

Will no one reply? I only have till Thursday, and I have been searching the web all day...

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Personally, I am against it. You were diagnosed...you have it...thats a fact. How were you diagnosed? There are some blood tests that are very specific for celiac and have very little false positive rates. Biopsies only confirm damage done...if a biopsy comes back negative that just means there is not damage done yet...that does not mean you do not have it.

I went through a denial stage where I thought I didn't have it and all and then I went and looked at my tests and so forth..I had to let it sink I guess.

You are very lucky that they caught this early because alot of doctors are not knowledgable in this...this disease is usually misdiagnosed and overlooked so the fact they found that speaks alot.

Cheating on this diet can literally knock years off of your life. It can cause cancer, osteoporosis, diabetes, liver/gallbladder/kidney/pancreas complications, nerve disorders , etc...it is very important..you really need to stay gluten free.

countryfairy Newbie

Well, thanks for answering. What you said makes a lot of sense. But I've had a blood test, and it said whether I'd had a regular intake of gluten for the past year (which I had, I know I'm not supposed to, but I did anyways), and it still came back negative. It's done that for the past two years, and I've only had it two years.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

So how did they diagnose you? Did your blood tests ever come back positive. You have to stay on gluten heavily for at least 3 months before blood tests or biopsies.

countryfairy Newbie

No, they never said positive. What do you mean by heavily? I probably had 1-3 gluten products per day (bagels, pizza, breaded shrimp...). Naturally, I didn't have gluten evry day, but many times I'd have a few cupcakes, or graham crackers or something.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Did you have the symptoms or anything? Why did they suspect celiac? Why did they give you a diagnosis?

Being on gluten heavily is equivalent to about 2 pieces of bread a day but if you were on a regular diet before being tested then that would be good enough.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



countryfairy Newbie

No, no symptoms.

They said it was common among diabetics, especially in my age group.

Also, they apparently go by a number; a positive number indivates celiac, and most people are 4-6 I think. I was .05 or something.

And, yes, I probably had the equivalent of 2 pieces of bread a day.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

-Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

-Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

-Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

-Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

-Total Serum IgA

The above tests are the tests you should have had done. Do you know what you tests you had done?

Some celiacs are IgA deficient so that can cause IgA levels to be down when they otherwise should have been positive.

Diabetics do sometimes have celiac but not all. Celiacs also do not have to have symptoms so that can make it hard to diagnose too.

plantime Contributor

If you already have a positive diagnosis from a doctor, there really is no reason to go for more tests to see if you have celiac. If you do go on the gluten for 3-6 months just for an endoscopy, it is my opinion (humble or vaunted!) that you are wasting money and your life/health/time.

For me to eat gluten, just a teenytiny amount, means two weeks of physical pain, depression, and psychosis. I cannot now imagine going through it for 3-6 months, just because I want a test result to be negative!

If you can find out what tests were used to get a diagnosis, we can let you know if we think the test was accurate or not.

celiac3270 Collaborator

I'm also strongly against gluten challenges. After a diagnosis, it serves no purpose to torture you for another six months just to tell you, again, that you have celiac disease. And the results don't lie.....

Just wanted to respond as I'm another person against the gluten challenge ;)

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Yea..doctors had to have diagnosed you somehow...they just don't go around handing out a celiac diagnosis.

I am against is as I previously stated.

You really need to follow the diet ...as I understand you saying you are not...you need to be. Celiacs can have very serious life threatening complications if you do not follow it.

Peaches503 Newbie

Hi,

I also agree with celiac3270 and Kaiti. I don't think doing the gluten challenge is a good idea. A diagnosis is a diagnosis, whether you have symptoms or not. The gluten challenge is not worth the damage it could do to your body. Besides, being gluten-free is beneficial to anyone anyway. Good luck with all of this.

-Peaches

Emme999 Enthusiast

So anyway... I haven't had the biopsy yet but the tTG was positive (and some other test she did). However, I had an ELISA food allergy test about a month earlier that showed my allergic reaction to wheat was *low*. I wonder if it came back that way because I had been on a *really* low grain diet prior to the test. Hmm... it kind of ticks me off though that it didn't show up on a food allergy test! What the (*$#^&???

What is the point of the biopsy anyway? I mean, my doctor said the blood tests showed a 95-100% chance that I have celiac disease, so why do I have to have the biopsy at all? With the osteoporosis, dental problems, and digestive troubles I have when I eat grains - I don't really know why I should need *another* diagnosis.

Is it a good idea to find out how much damage has been done to your villi? Does the biopsy also detect cancer or something? I'm very confused, and kind of scared about going through the procedure. Kind of terrified actually. The whole "conscious sedation" thing still has the word "conscious" in it! Yikes!

celiac3270 Collaborator

Even on a full wheat diet, it wouldn't have shown up. celiac disease is an intolerance, not an allergy, so unless you ALSO have an allergy to wheat, it wouldn't show up on the allergy test.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Bean-

A biopsy just shows how much damage there is to the intestines(if any)

I would not think you would need a biopsy unless your doctor just wants to do one to see how much damage you have. I did not get a biopsy after positive bloodwork because the doctor felt I didn't need one.

Allergy testing is completely different and will not pick up on celiac...that has its own testing.

plantime Contributor
So anyway... I haven't had the biopsy yet but the tTG was positive (and some other test she did). However, I had an ELISA food allergy test about a month earlier that showed my allergic reaction to wheat was *low*. I wonder if it came back that way because I had been on a *really* low grain diet prior to the test. Hmm... it kind of ticks me off though that it didn't show up on a food allergy test! What the (*$#^&???

What is the point of the biopsy anyway? I mean, my doctor said the blood tests showed a 95-100% chance that I have celiac disease, so why do I have to have the biopsy at all? With the osteoporosis, dental problems, and digestive troubles I have when I eat grains - I don't really know why I should need *another* diagnosis.

Is it a good idea to find out how much damage has been done to your villi? Does the biopsy also detect cancer or something? I'm very confused, and kind of scared about going through the procedure. Kind of terrified actually. The whole "conscious sedation" thing still has the word "conscious" in it! Yikes!

Aaahh, Bean!! {{{hugs}}}!! The endoscopy and biopsy are not that bad at all. "Conscious Sedation" means that you are not put completely under, and do not require things like a respirator and something to keep your heart beating. I don't remember anything of mine after the throat spray until I woke up at home in my recliner. Perhaps the doctor wants to know how much damage you have, or if there is something else causing digestive problems for you. Ulcers and ulcerative colitis come to mind. Celiac will not show up at all on an allergy test. They are two distinctly different problems, with different tests required for diagnosis, but the same "cure"! :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.