Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Aha Test Results Back!


dbuhl79

Recommended Posts

dbuhl79 Contributor

So after fighting with my doctors office, I finally got copies of my test results back. Good news is it does look legitimate I don't have Celiac Disease based on these findings. Maybe just a gluten intolerance? I don't know! I've been having a heck of a week digestively as it is, thinking I've snuck something in my diet my body isn't loving.. or maybe its just IBS, but I do feel frustrated.. :( Any thoughts.. .

IGA 150.00 mg/dl (units)

Transglutam IGA 5 AU

Sed Rate RBC 3 mm/h

C-Reactivev Prot < 0.1 mg/dl

Hmm.. what can I eat, is now what I wonder..

Thanks for your thoughts!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lesliean Apprentice

I wouldn't consider this a complete blood panel. I wouldn't rule out Celiacs based on this panel. Did the gluten free diet help you? What are your symptoms? See:

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodi...-44105346207.ce

I'll wait for your post.

Leslie

CMWeaver Apprentice

When we had my girls tested, they did it in two rounds. The first was the testing that was ordered for you. Their ped. had no idea what could be the problem. The only thing that came up positive at first for them was IgG which I didn't see.

The second round run by a GI was

Anti-tissue Transglutaminase Antibody (tTG),

Anti-Endomysial Antibodies (EMA), IgA:

Anti-Gliadin Antibodies (AGA), IgG

Anti-Reticulin Antibodies (ARA)

These came up positive. Initially, they thought they had a what "allergy". The second round of lab tests (which were positive) and a biopsy confirmed the celiac.

dbuhl79 Contributor

Yes this was all I was tested for. I went off gluten for about a week or so approximately before visiting my GI. Suddenly allmy digestive issues halted, and were gone! (Thankfully) Unfortunately, I realized that if I was to talk my GI into testing me for Celiac, I would hav eto go back on gluten. I did for about a week before they did the blood test. (Which could be the negative results).

I was informed befor eleaving the doctors office that I need not worry and call them for my results, as they would be on top of this an eagerly contacting me. (HA!) I had to call, and call, and finally got a hold of a nurse who informed me that they were negative. That was it, no follow-up appt. to see why i was loosing weight, having horrible abdominal pain and diarrhea, mad dashes to the bathroom and literally shaking out of panic of not making it! They half-hearteldy mentioned IBS when they were seeing me initally as a possible cause, that and UC, and Chrons. Needless to say I went back to gluten-free diet as my symptoms passed.

It is only in this few weeks that I've had a gluten accident. I went back to my strict gluten-free diet and the symptoms subsided slightly, flaired up viciously last week and have had abomdinal pain all through the week. Even some what heartburn feelings too. so I am now questinoing if it is a gluten intolerance or just plain IBS brought on by stress. (a family member recently diagnosed with cancer).

I am debating going back to the GI as anxiety is taking over all my outings again, in fear I could have a nother "upset" and urgently need a bathroom. I mean, how frustrating is it to go somewhere and be counting the bathrooms along the way! :) I know you all can relate.. but I am so lost as to wha tI should or should not eat, if I have IBS, celiac disease, or goodness knows what.. :) I suppose its time to swallow my pride and see the GI again. Ahh this is what I get for being a stubborn woman!

Thanks for your replies and your support. If you think of any other possibilities that'd be great, or any suggestions on starting perhaps an elimination diet!

gf4life Enthusiast

Hi Dana,

IGA 150.00 mg/dl (units) ~ This is your total IgA. Adults usually have 90-450mg/dl, so you are fine with this. If you were deficient it would alter how they read your other Celiac tests.

Transglutam IGA 5 AU ~ This is the most "specific" test for celiac disease. That means if you are positive, then you have celiac disease, but if you are negative it does NOT mean that you don't have celiac disease or will never have celiac disease. You could be one of the many people who take a long time to produce the accepted positive level of this antibody, regardless of how bad the symptoms might be.

Sed Rate RBC 3 mm/h & C-Reactivev Prot < 0.1 mg/dl ~ Both of these tests check for inflammation in the body. They don't tell you if you have celiac disease or not.

I would get the rest of the Celiac Panel done if posible, or get the gene test done if you are already gluten-free. Going back on gluten is horrible after you have been gluten-free for a while. It isn't worth it in my opinion. You seem to already know that gluten is bothering you, so stick with that. You know your body better than anyone else.

God bless,

Mariann

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,696
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Christina Whincup
    Newest Member
    Christina Whincup
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Grahamsnaturalworld
      Where can I find a gastro in adelaide who can diagnose refractory celiac disease have seen 3 so far and don't understand the most obvious question, why my celiac symptoms did not resolve on a gluten free diet the symptoms just got worse as it is attacking my nervous system. 
    • ShariW
      I recently traveled to Spain and Portugal. I was with a tour group, they knew I needed to be gluten-free and made sure the kitchens preparing the group meals were aware. But just in case, I took Gliadin-X with me and took it for every evening meal - and most other meals. The one time I got glutened was from lunch early in the trip - had to be from cross-contamination. I had not taken Gliadin-X before that meal, which made for a pretty miserable day. Learned my lesson... 😞 
    • Hummer01
      Hi trents, thanks for the response.  The 2nd opinion doctor said that if my CRP is still elevated at that time, he would advise me to look at Crohns/UC or another autoimmune issue. The colonoscopy I had this year seemed to rule those 2 out for now so he still believed celiac may explain it. No previous doctors have suggested any explanation for it even after calling to tell me it was a concerning result.  I guess it feels tough knowing I have positive blood testing, permissive genetics, and visible duodenum changes... and somehow it's NCGS instead of celiac. I'm still surprised the biopsies came back negative when the doctor was so sure they would be positive.
    • trents
      "He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac." But with if the elevated CRP levels are caused by some other inflammatory process going on in your body? "She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate." Totally wrong! This is a highly accurate test for celiac disease, that requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests. It is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals with the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the sensitivity is generally very high, ranging from 90% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition. The specificity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the specificity is also high, typically around 95% to 100%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition. Taken from the following article: Looking at the whole picture, I am wondering if you are transitioning from NCGS to celiac disease. Some experts in the gluten disorder field believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • Hummer01
      Hi all, just wanted to post an update.  I have been gluten free for about 1.5 months now and seeing improvement already in the bathroom.  Recently I had a visit with another GI doctor for a 2nd opinion. He said that while my blood tests and scope are not a "slam dunk" for celiac, he believes it's more likely than not that I have it. His advice was to stay with a celiac-level gluten free diet (no CC) for 6-12 months then retest to make sure TTG-IGA is still negative. He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac.  Today I had a follow up with the original GI that performed the scope. She is confident it is NCGS and says I can still have gluten sometimes. When I asked about the visible duodenum damage, she said it is just "irritation" from gluten because the biopsies were negative. She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate."  I guess I'm having trouble reconciling the totally different advice from these 2 GI's. I want to believe the new doctor more at this point because what he said just makes more sense to me, and he gave an actionable timeline for possible next steps. Feeling lost and disappointed at this point and wanted to write it down here in case anyone has input. Thank you.   
×
×
  • Create New...