Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results Back - Can Someone Interpret?


KristenInWA

Recommended Posts

KristenInWA Newbie

Hi everyone,

I finally got my 'celiac package' back (YAY!) from my doctor's office, and this is what it's showing:

Anti endomysial, IgA: Negative

Anti Gliadin, IgA: 4

Anti Gliadin, IgG: 65

Anti tTransglutaminase, IgA: 2

The results say that my anti-gliadin IgG is 'low positive' with a reference between 61 and 90 for low positive.

I've been lowish carb for about a year now, and have not been eating bread in particular.

Based on this information as I had mentioned in a separate post, the doctor recommended I eat wheat products every day for two weeks and come back in to get a re-draw. I started yesterday and am feeling gross - bloated, gassy and generally icky.

Any information you have on what this means would be wonderful.

Thanks :) Kristen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lizard00 Enthusiast

If you have been gluten lite, which it sounds as though you have, it can most definitely affect your test results. And to be honest, two weeks is probably not going to be enough. Your tests do indicate something's going on, so it seems as though you are on the right track.

nora-n Rookie

Yes, two weeks is probably not enough. I was gluten light for six months and five weeks of much gluten did not give a positive biopsy. Should have been more like 6 weeks to three months, in my case maybe three months or more.

I have not seen anywhere in the literature that gluten challenges have lsated only two weeks. I have seen 6 weeks and three months and six months, even up to six years.

(they put some diagnosed celiacs back on gluten and tested them repeatedly and it took from six weeks to six years, all of them went positive I think. In the old days they used to tink celiac was a childhood thing and that they outgrew it)

CSU Grad Newbie

Yes, two weeks is probably not enough. I was gluten light for six months and five weeks of much gluten did not give a positive biopsy. Should have been more like 6 weeks to three months, in my case maybe three months or more.

I have not seen anywhere in the literature that gluten challenges have lsated only two weeks. I have seen 6 weeks and three months and six months, even up to six years.

(they put some diagnosed celiacs back on gluten and tested them repeatedly and it took from six weeks to six years, all of them went positive I think. In the old days they used to tink celiac was a childhood thing and that they outgrew it)

Also, be advised that it depends very heavily on what you call "wheat". Eating junky white bread will get you far less "wheat" in your diet than something with a normal concentration of wheat gluten in it. So, "eating wheat" is really a vague term, and your doctor should have been much more specific, if he/she really understands whats going on here...

My advice would be, if you really want/need "proof" of your ailment, then get a DNA test done also, and stop piddling around with serology antibody tests, which, because of their average sensitivity and specificity, are not very accurate. Of course, your biopsy antibody tests will be more accurate than the basic serology, but invasive...and less accurate than a DNA test combined with your already existing symptoms and antibody results.

If you don't need a "diagnosis" for medical or insurance reasons, then just follow the gluten free diet; you already know you need to.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      6

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Silk tha Shocker's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Help

    4. - Silk tha Shocker posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Help

    5. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,478
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Susan Gutenberger
    Newest Member
    Susan Gutenberger
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Roses8721
      Yes, i pulled raw ancetry data and saw i have 2/3 markers for DQ2.2 but have heard from friends in genetics that this raw data can be wildly innacurate
    • Ginger38
      Thanks, I’m still dealing with the pain and tingling and itching and feeling like bugs or something crawling around on my face and scalp. It’s been a miserable experience. I saw my eye doc last week, the eye itself was okay, so they didn’t do anything. I did take a 7 day course of an antiviral. I’m hoping for a turnaround soon! My life is full of stress but I have been on / off the gluten free diet for the last year , after being talked into going back on gluten to have a biopsy, that looked okay. But I do have positive antibody levels that have been responsive  to a gluten free diet. I can’t help but wonder if the last year has caused all this. 
    • Scott Adams
      I don't think any apps are up to date, which is exactly why this happened to you. Most of the data in such apps is years old, and it doesn't get updated in real time. Ultimately there is no substitution for learning to read labels. The following two lists are very helpful for anyone who is gluten sensitive and needs to avoid gluten when shopping. It's very important to learn to read labels and understand sources of hidden gluten, and to know some general information about product labelling--for example in the USA if wheat is a possible allergen it must be declared on a product's ingredient label like this: Allergens: Wheat.      
    • Silk tha Shocker
      What is the best gluten free scanner app? I have the "gluten-free Scanner" app. I scanned an almond joy and it says it contains gluten when the package is labeled gluten free
    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.