Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results Back - Can Someone Interpret?


KristenInWA

Recommended Posts

KristenInWA Newbie

Hi everyone,

I finally got my 'celiac package' back (YAY!) from my doctor's office, and this is what it's showing:

Anti endomysial, IgA: Negative

Anti Gliadin, IgA: 4

Anti Gliadin, IgG: 65

Anti tTransglutaminase, IgA: 2

The results say that my anti-gliadin IgG is 'low positive' with a reference between 61 and 90 for low positive.

I've been lowish carb for about a year now, and have not been eating bread in particular.

Based on this information as I had mentioned in a separate post, the doctor recommended I eat wheat products every day for two weeks and come back in to get a re-draw. I started yesterday and am feeling gross - bloated, gassy and generally icky.

Any information you have on what this means would be wonderful.

Thanks :) Kristen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lizard00 Enthusiast

If you have been gluten lite, which it sounds as though you have, it can most definitely affect your test results. And to be honest, two weeks is probably not going to be enough. Your tests do indicate something's going on, so it seems as though you are on the right track.

nora-n Rookie

Yes, two weeks is probably not enough. I was gluten light for six months and five weeks of much gluten did not give a positive biopsy. Should have been more like 6 weeks to three months, in my case maybe three months or more.

I have not seen anywhere in the literature that gluten challenges have lsated only two weeks. I have seen 6 weeks and three months and six months, even up to six years.

(they put some diagnosed celiacs back on gluten and tested them repeatedly and it took from six weeks to six years, all of them went positive I think. In the old days they used to tink celiac was a childhood thing and that they outgrew it)

CSU Grad Newbie

Yes, two weeks is probably not enough. I was gluten light for six months and five weeks of much gluten did not give a positive biopsy. Should have been more like 6 weeks to three months, in my case maybe three months or more.

I have not seen anywhere in the literature that gluten challenges have lsated only two weeks. I have seen 6 weeks and three months and six months, even up to six years.

(they put some diagnosed celiacs back on gluten and tested them repeatedly and it took from six weeks to six years, all of them went positive I think. In the old days they used to tink celiac was a childhood thing and that they outgrew it)

Also, be advised that it depends very heavily on what you call "wheat". Eating junky white bread will get you far less "wheat" in your diet than something with a normal concentration of wheat gluten in it. So, "eating wheat" is really a vague term, and your doctor should have been much more specific, if he/she really understands whats going on here...

My advice would be, if you really want/need "proof" of your ailment, then get a DNA test done also, and stop piddling around with serology antibody tests, which, because of their average sensitivity and specificity, are not very accurate. Of course, your biopsy antibody tests will be more accurate than the basic serology, but invasive...and less accurate than a DNA test combined with your already existing symptoms and antibody results.

If you don't need a "diagnosis" for medical or insurance reasons, then just follow the gluten free diet; you already know you need to.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Samanthaeileen1 replied to Samanthaeileen1's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      7

      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

    2. - GlorietaKaro replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      5

      Am I nuts?

    3. - trents replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      5

      Am I nuts?

    4. - GlorietaKaro replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      5

      Am I nuts?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,807
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aron2
    Newest Member
    Aron2
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • JoJo0611
      Thank you this really helped. 
    • Samanthaeileen1
      Okay that is really good to know. So with that being positive and the other being high it makes sense she diagnosed her even without the endoscopy. So glad we caught it early. She had so many symptoms though that to me it was clear something was wrong.   yeah I think we had better test us and the other kids as well. 
    • GlorietaKaro
      One doctor suggested it, but then seemed irritated when I asked follow-up questions. Oh well—
    • trents
      @GlorietaKaro, your respiratory reactions to gluten make me wonder if there might also be an allergic (anaphylaxis) component at work here.
    • GlorietaKaro
      Thanks to both of you for your responses!  Sadly, even after several years of very strict gluten avoidance, I remember the symptoms well enough that I am too frightened to risk a gluten challenge— heartbeat and breathing problems are scary— Scott, thank you for the specific information— I will call around in the new year to see if I can find anyone. In the meantime, I will carry on has I have been— it’s working! Thanks also for the validation— sometimes I just feel crushed by disbelief. Not enough to make me eat gluten though—
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.