Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

No Man's Land


melblondin

Recommended Posts

melblondin Apprentice

Sooooo, I feel like I'm in the middle of no-man's land with trying to figure out if we do in fact have celiac or not. The gist of it is in the fall of '08 I was diagnosed with hypothyroid and then shortly after that with a wheat allergy. I had/have suspected celiac all along because of chronic symptoms such as anemia, joint pain, extreme fatigue, chronic constipation, random headaches, gas, bloating, stomach cramps, etc.

On top of all of my symptoms I have 3 boys who are between the 3rd and 5th percentiles for growth and who before solid foods were introduced were up in the 75th range. They oldest two (3 and 5) complain of frequent tummy aches, have very loose stools, the 5 year old has eczema, and the 3 year old has face flushing pretty much all the time and little raised bumps on his upper arms. Then at the now 3 year old's 2 year check up his bloodwork for celiac came up "inconclusive." If I remember correctly he was 1 or 2 points away from being a positive. After that we went to a GI who looked at both boys, did some stool tests to check for parasites, said they were fine and sent us on our merry way.

Since I still strongly suspect celiac being that they are both very small and my infant just recently went from the 75th to the 10th percentile in a 5 month period of time, I went ahead and did genetic testing for myself. The genetic test came back positive for DQ2.5 hetrozygous. I don't want to go back on gluten to have a biopsy because I'll feel awful and my asthma attacks will come back due to the allergy, but I feel like I'm in this land of thinking I have it, but not totally certain. I wouldn't be eating gluten either way, but I want to know what's going on for the sake of my kids and I just kind of wish I could get a definitive answer one way or another.

I'm leaning toward having the 3 year old biopsied despite his most recent bloodwork being negative, but I don't know. Ugh....

Thanks for listening :-)

Any thoughts or opinions are most certainly welcome!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

You do sound like you and the kids are in the right place. Noone can make the choice about the biopsy for your little one for you. It is usually an easy procedure but he will be under anesthesia. There is also a chance of a false negative. The drop in percentile is significant, my son also had this effect and going from 75th to 10th in 5 months is something that happened with him. If you are going to biopsy then of course keep them on gluten until that is done but I would start the diet as soon as testing is over and see if it helps them, no matter what the test results.

melblondin Apprentice

Thx for the input Ravenwood. We have an appt. next Thurs. Now I'm leaning the other way and just want to get them gluten free as soon as possible. I recently weighed the 10 mth old and he's not even on the growth chart anymore :-( The weird thing though is that I stopped giving him gluten about 2 months ago....

On a side note, do you know if when people say that 30% of the population carry the celiac genes and don't ever develop the disease if that number is referring to all the diff. "celiac" genes that they know of or is that 30% referring to the DQ2.5 gene specifically?? Just curious.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,208
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gail Brown
    Newest Member
    Gail Brown
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.