Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Had My Endoscopy Today


mamarie

Recommended Posts

mamarie Rookie

The doctor told me afterwards that it showed I had acid reflux. He told me I should start taking prilosec. Also, he said there was redness somewhere else (I forget) which indicated to him a lack of good bacteria. He said he couldn't see anything that would make him think celiac. Although we are waiting on the biopsy for sure.

My question... isn't acid reflux a good indication (along with my other symptoms) of a gluten intolerance? Would lack of good bacteria also be a symptom?

This particular doctor doesn't seem convinced that gluten is my problem (even though one blood test came back stating a wheat intolerance). It's like he's looking at all these things in isolation of each other. I asked him if the above two things he found today could be causing my malabsorption issue with D, and he said no. Sooooo, why doesn't he want to get to the bottom of what might be causing it?? If my biopsy comes back and says no celiac, I have a feeling this doctor will just treat my symptoms (above) and be done with me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Heidi S. Rookie

The doctor told me afterwards that it showed I had acid reflux. He told me I should start taking prilosec. Also, he said there was redness somewhere else (I forget) which indicated to him a lack of good bacteria. He said he couldn't see anything that would make him think celiac. Although we are waiting on the biopsy for sure.

My question... isn't acid reflux a good indication (along with my other symptoms) of a gluten intolerance? Would lack of good bacteria also be a symptom?

This particular doctor doesn't seem convinced that gluten is my problem (even though one blood test came back stating a wheat intolerance). It's like he's looking at all these things in isolation of each other. I asked him if the above two things he found today could be causing my malabsorption issue with D, and he said no. Sooooo, why doesn't he want to get to the bottom of what might be causing it?? If my biopsy comes back and says no celiac, I have a feeling this doctor will just treat my symptoms (above) and be done with me.

I would be concerned too! I was fighting vitamin D deficiencies, endoscopy came back with major inflammation, poor bacteria, and acid reflux. They put me on acid reflux meds and told me to go on a high fiber diet.... I ended up in the hospital with surgery removing my gallbadder (which wasnt the problem). Month later we figured it out.. It baffles me that he thinks it is not related. Good Luck and stay strong!

gary'sgirl Explorer

My story is very similar. I had an endoscopy and after the procedure the doc told me that I had very bad inflammation and put me on an antacid. When the results came back it did verify Celiac. It seems to me that a very high percentage of people with gluten problems have acid reflux.

Interestingly enough, I also had my gallbladder out a couple of months later too. I think that gallbladder problems may also be connected with gluten problems. Infact I'm pretty sure that before I had my gallbladder out, whenever I would get glutened I would have a gal-attack.

I also am having problem with bacterial overgrowth - I think all this stuff is definetly related. If your labs come back normal, you should still consider going gluten free and maybe finding another doctor, because your doc may just be out of ideas and not know a lot about this sort of stuff.

Let us know what happens when you get your results back.

Sarah

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Your doctor can't tell just by looking and I do hope he took a few biopsies from different areas. Since you are done with testing you can start a trial of the diet today. Your body may give you the answers before you even go back for the test results.

mamarie Rookie

He did say he took samples from a few different areas. He made it seem though that he could tell a lot by just looking at the picture, pretty much diagnosing me negative right there. I don't like this doctor, can you tell? :) I'm going to start gluten free on my own despite the results anyway, so in a way I guess it doesn't matter much. It's just frustrating!!

Your doctor can't tell just by looking and I do hope he took a few biopsies from different areas. Since you are done with testing you can start a trial of the diet today. Your body may give you the answers before you even go back for the test results.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,634
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    dysmathers
    Newest Member
    dysmathers
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
    • Inkie
      I  notice a reaction to tea bags, possibly due to gluten or other substances. Is this recognizable?
    • trents
      The blood tests you had done are not the main ones. The two main ones are the "Total IGA" (to check for IGA deficiency) and the "TTG-IGA". Current guidelines for the "gluten challenge" when people have been gluten free for a significant time period are the daily consumption of at least10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. That should give you some perspective.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.