Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Accuracy


angiegoo

Recommended Posts

angiegoo Newbie

Hi there,

I was wondering if anyone had any ideas as to how accurate blood tests for celiac are?

A couple of months ago I tested positive with:

Gliadin IgA Abs *59 (0-20)

tTG IgA/IgG *273 (0-20)

Yesterday I had the biopsy, and now have to wait another two weeks to find out the results. I have no typical symptoms of celiac disease, but the reason I was tested was because my mum was just diagnosed with it this year.

Does anyone know what I should be expecting from the biopsy?

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

tTG IgA/IgG *273 (0-20) is a strong positive on a test that is rather specific. False positives are uncommon.

Even if your biopsy fails to find damage to your villi, you should seriously consider trying the gluten-free diet after the biopsy. You say you have no typical symptoms, but there are over 200 known symptoms. It was a year into the gluten-free diet that I read about migraine headaches as a symptom and realized that, after years of having them, I had not had one since going gluten-free. It is ten years now that I have not had one.

angiegoo Newbie

tTG IgA/IgG *273 (0-20) is a strong positive on a test that is rather specific. False positives are uncommon.

Even if your biopsy fails to find damage to your villi, you should seriously consider trying the gluten-free diet after the biopsy. You say you have no typical symptoms, but there are over 200 known symptoms. It was a year into the gluten-free diet that I read about migraine headaches as a symptom and realized that, after years of having them, I had not had one since going gluten-free. It is ten years now that I have not had one.

Ok, thanks heaps.

Yes, the GI suggested that I try going gluten free even if I have a negative biopsy result, he said I could be gluten intolerant. I was still dozey at the time he told me that though, and I forgot to ask him what the difference is between celiac disease and just being gluten intolerant?!

nora-n Rookie

There is some new research now into positive ttg antibodies and negative biopsies, and they did find the people that went gltuen free did improve.

Nowadays a lot of celiacs are diagnosed without any symptoms, that is because they now test close blood relatives of diagnosed celiacs.

Often they ahve severe villi damage but no symptoms. Old an young.

They found that 3% of old people have celiac when screening old people in Finland, but they did not have symptoms. The percentage of celiacs increase with age.

Skylark Collaborator

A LOT of people with anti-tTG antibodies find that some subtle health problems go away when they don't consume gluten whether or not the biopsy is positive.

The connection between gluten intolerance and celiac is unclear. People like you with anti-tTG are probably in an early stage of celiac disease even if the biopsy is normal. There are other people with negative blood tests and biopsy who still get very sick if they eat gluten.

angiegoo Newbie

A LOT of people with anti-tTG antibodies find that some subtle health problems go away when they don't consume gluten whether or not the biopsy is positive.

The connection between gluten intolerance and celiac is unclear. People like you with anti-tTG are probably in an early stage of celiac disease even if the biopsy is normal. There are other people with negative blood tests and biopsy who still get very sick if they eat gluten.

So if it comes back with a normal biopsy is it possible that after a few years the biopsy could come back positive? If so, then would it be a good idea to go and get another biopsy after a few years? Or just go off gluten once some more prevalent symptoms arise?

Thanks for all the input. :)

ravenwoodglass Mentor

So if it comes back with a normal biopsy is it possible that after a few years the biopsy could come back positive? If so, then would it be a good idea to go and get another biopsy after a few years? Or just go off gluten once some more prevalent symptoms arise?

Thanks for all the input. :)

You can still be celiac even with a negative biopsy and negative blood tests for that matter. As far as the biopsy goes damage can be patchy and it can be missed in the areas that they take the biopsy from. I would go gluten free after the biopsy and not even wait for the results. With a firmly diagnosed parent and the strong positive blood work you have had it would be the wise thing to do to prevent damage to your brain, liver, joints, gallbladder, etc. In some GI symptoms are one of the last things to so up and a lot of antibody damage can happen before that occurs.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

People with positive blood tests have been followed in studies. Some people with anti-tTG convert to celiac and a LOT of people with anti-endomysial antibodies convert. You didn't mention getting anti-endomysial done.

If your biopsy comes back normal, you still might try gluten-free for a while. You might be really surprised at which nagging health problems vanish.

You also might think about whether you want to even give your body a chance to develop more autoimmunity. Basically, you can completely avoid the risk of developing a pretty troublesome disease by adopting the gluten-free diet. Remember, you can't "undo" celiac autoimmunity. Once your body learns to attack itself, you become at-risk for other problems like autoimmune thyroid disease and nerve damage.

angiegoo Newbie

People with positive blood tests have been followed in studies. Some people with anti-tTG convert to celiac and a LOT of people with anti-endomysial antibodies convert. You didn't mention getting anti-endomysial done.

If your biopsy comes back normal, you still might try gluten-free for a while. You might be really surprised at which nagging health problems vanish.

You also might think about whether you want to even give your body a chance to develop more autoimmunity. Basically, you can completely avoid the risk of developing a pretty troublesome disease by adopting the gluten-free diet. Remember, you can't "undo" celiac autoimmunity. Once your body learns to attack itself, you become at-risk for other problems like autoimmune thyroid disease and nerve damage.

Ok, thanks. I guess it would be harder to go gluten free, if I haven't officially been diagnosed as celiac...people wouldn't really understand why I would make that choice if my results come back negative.

In a way I'm hoping the biopsy result come back showing signs of damage.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Ok, thanks. I guess it would be harder to go gluten free, if I haven't officially been diagnosed as celiac...people wouldn't really understand why I would make that choice if my results come back negative.

In a way I'm hoping the biopsy result come back showing signs of damage.

For your sake I hope it does also. Keep in mind that not all celiac symptoms are gut related. I do hope you do at least a dietary trial. You may discover that things you never dreamed could be related to celiac resolve. If your producing antibodies that are showing up in blood work damage is being done somewhere.

Skylark Collaborator

Ok, thanks. I guess it would be harder to go gluten free, if I haven't officially been diagnosed as celiac...people wouldn't really understand why I would make that choice if my results come back negative.

In a way I'm hoping the biopsy result come back showing signs of damage.

I do hope you try the diet at least. If it turns you you feel better gluten-free, it's easy to justify. "No, I don't have celiac but I sure am happier without these minor health problems."

If it makes no difference, you probably don't need to be strictly gluten free. The celiac experts at the conference I saw think folks with "latent celiac" (this is what you would be with negative biopsy) or first-degree relatives with celiac are wisest to go light on the gluten. It's not a matter of the strict celiac diet, but rather doing things like cooking rice and potatoes at home instead of eating bread, and choosing different grains for your breakfast cereals. They think eating less gluten lowers your risk of becoming fully celiac.

angiegoo Newbie

Great, thanks everyone for the helpful info. I think I'm going to wait for the results and consider limiting my gluten intake regardless of what happens.

  • 2 weeks later...
angiegoo Newbie

Hi all,

I finally found out my biopsy results. I spoke with my doc over the phone and he told me there was 'some early stages of celiac disease found...' and given my history and bloodwork I probably should 'try going gluten free for a few months'.

Even though he didn't solidly say that I have celiac, I think that from what I've read here on the forum, I can safely say 'I am celiac.' I don't think any damage would appear on a biopsy if you weren't celiac, would it?

Anyways, a gluten free diet is now underway, which I intend to stick to beyond a few months...I'm hoping it won't be too hard to get used to!

Thanks everyone for your help :)

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Hi all,

I finally found out my biopsy results. I spoke with my doc over the phone and he told me there was 'some early stages of celiac disease found...' and given my history and bloodwork I probably should 'try going gluten free for a few months'.

Even though he didn't solidly say that I have celiac, I think that from what I've read here on the forum, I can safely say 'I am celiac.' I don't think any damage would appear on a biopsy if you weren't celiac, would it?

Anyways, a gluten free diet is now underway, which I intend to stick to beyond a few months...I'm hoping it won't be too hard to get used to!

Thanks everyone for your help :)

I know this sounds funny but I am relieved that the biopsy was positive. Yes you can now say you have celiac. I am very thankful for you that the damage is in the early stages. The lifestyle does take a bit of getting used to but you can do it. You may find a bit of withdrawl but not all do. Ask any questions you need to you. We are here for you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,840
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gabcar14
    Newest Member
    Gabcar14
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • HilaryM
      Thank you Scott - I can’t think of much that’s changed diet wise but I’ll definitely try to see if any of this works and probiotics are a great idea thank you!
    • cristiana
      Hello there @maylynn  I'm a slow healer from the UK.  I sympathise.  Despite three endoscopies which showed nothing wrong, I frequently suffered from a very sore stomach, bloating, feeling queasy.   For some time I was taking the wrong iron supplement (Floradix instead of Floravital - the former has gluten in it, but the latter none).  But I would say even very little iron from an approved source made my stomach sore, I think it can be quite irritating. Perhaps that is an issue for you? Oats (the gluten-free pure ones) were an issue for many years (now fine).   Even though my endoscopy findings did not reflect any problems with healing, or any other issues, I self-diagnosed myself with gastritis as it seemed the feeling of nausea and in my case burning in the stomach pointed to it.  I went onto a gastritis/reflux diet and that really helped.   Have a google - there are tonnes online.  That meant avoiding spicy, greasy food, onions, tomatoes, coffee and alcohol.  (Actually, I don't drink, but I did toast someone during that time at a baptism and it set my stomach on fire.)   Instead of drinking strong coffee, I drank water, camomile tea, warm ginger water... so soothing.  I would not go to bed with a full stomach when things were bad, I would let my stomach rest from say 8pm to 8am, which really helped.   My husband and I then decided to buy a new oven and to buy a new dishwasher - we did need new ones anyway.  The new oven had two compartments, gluten goes in one, gluten free in the other.  The new dishwasher was a Miele which does a full rinse with clean water before washing the dishes.  But before I could afford a new dishwasher I would hand wash the dishes and make sure they were really rinsed well, no residue  (unlike our old dishwasher that was really not rinsing well at all). I stopped eating out for quite a few years - I think this is a biggy - although I would have coffee and soft drinks out. Eventually, my levels normalised.  What of the above was the 'silver bullet'?  I am not sure, but finally I did feel a lot better.  Occasionally I will take an over the counter PPI (omeprazole) or a small dose of Gaviscon, but most of the time I don't need them now. I'm not expecting anyone to go to all these lengths, but it could be that one or two of the tips I give you might work.  Don't give up hope! Cristiana
    • RMJ
      Yes, it would make sense to go mostly gluten free, since it gives your troubles.
    • SMK7
      Yes, I made an effort to eat extra gluten at least 3 weeks before the endoscopy. I probably ate a some amount in the weeks before that. I had diarrhea, which resolved once I cut back after the endoscopy. So I think it would make sense to go mostly gluten free?  
    • RMJ
      Yay for the normal biopsy! Thanks for the follow up. Were you eating gluten prior to the endoscopy?
×
×
  • Create New...