Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Accuracy

angiegoo

Recommended Posts

angiegoo Newbie
angiegoo
Posted

Hi there,

I was wondering if anyone had any ideas as to how accurate blood tests for celiac are?

A couple of months ago I tested positive with:

Gliadin IgA Abs *59 (0-20)

tTG IgA/IgG *273 (0-20)

Yesterday I had the biopsy, and now have to wait another two weeks to find out the results. I have no typical symptoms of celiac disease, but the reason I was tested was because my mum was just diagnosed with it this year.

Does anyone know what I should be expecting from the biopsy?

Thanks

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

tTG IgA/IgG *273 (0-20) is a strong positive on a test that is rather specific. False positives are uncommon.

Even if your biopsy fails to find damage to your villi, you should seriously consider trying the gluten-free diet after the biopsy. You say you have no typical symptoms, but there are over 200 known symptoms. It was a year into the gluten-free diet that I read about migraine headaches as a symptom and realized that, after years of having them, I had not had one since going gluten-free. It is ten years now that I have not had one.

angiegoo Newbie
angiegoo
Posted
  • Author

tTG IgA/IgG *273 (0-20) is a strong positive on a test that is rather specific. False positives are uncommon.

Even if your biopsy fails to find damage to your villi, you should seriously consider trying the gluten-free diet after the biopsy. You say you have no typical symptoms, but there are over 200 known symptoms. It was a year into the gluten-free diet that I read about migraine headaches as a symptom and realized that, after years of having them, I had not had one since going gluten-free. It is ten years now that I have not had one.

Ok, thanks heaps.

Yes, the GI suggested that I try going gluten free even if I have a negative biopsy result, he said I could be gluten intolerant. I was still dozey at the time he told me that though, and I forgot to ask him what the difference is between celiac disease and just being gluten intolerant?!

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

There is some new research now into positive ttg antibodies and negative biopsies, and they did find the people that went gltuen free did improve.

Nowadays a lot of celiacs are diagnosed without any symptoms, that is because they now test close blood relatives of diagnosed celiacs.

Often they ahve severe villi damage but no symptoms. Old an young.

They found that 3% of old people have celiac when screening old people in Finland, but they did not have symptoms. The percentage of celiacs increase with age.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

A LOT of people with anti-tTG antibodies find that some subtle health problems go away when they don't consume gluten whether or not the biopsy is positive.

The connection between gluten intolerance and celiac is unclear. People like you with anti-tTG are probably in an early stage of celiac disease even if the biopsy is normal. There are other people with negative blood tests and biopsy who still get very sick if they eat gluten.

angiegoo Newbie
angiegoo
Posted
  • Author

A LOT of people with anti-tTG antibodies find that some subtle health problems go away when they don't consume gluten whether or not the biopsy is positive.

The connection between gluten intolerance and celiac is unclear. People like you with anti-tTG are probably in an early stage of celiac disease even if the biopsy is normal. There are other people with negative blood tests and biopsy who still get very sick if they eat gluten.

So if it comes back with a normal biopsy is it possible that after a few years the biopsy could come back positive? If so, then would it be a good idea to go and get another biopsy after a few years? Or just go off gluten once some more prevalent symptoms arise?

Thanks for all the input. :)

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

So if it comes back with a normal biopsy is it possible that after a few years the biopsy could come back positive? If so, then would it be a good idea to go and get another biopsy after a few years? Or just go off gluten once some more prevalent symptoms arise?

Thanks for all the input. :)

You can still be celiac even with a negative biopsy and negative blood tests for that matter. As far as the biopsy goes damage can be patchy and it can be missed in the areas that they take the biopsy from. I would go gluten free after the biopsy and not even wait for the results. With a firmly diagnosed parent and the strong positive blood work you have had it would be the wise thing to do to prevent damage to your brain, liver, joints, gallbladder, etc. In some GI symptoms are one of the last things to so up and a lot of antibody damage can happen before that occurs.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

People with positive blood tests have been followed in studies. Some people with anti-tTG convert to celiac and a LOT of people with anti-endomysial antibodies convert. You didn't mention getting anti-endomysial done.

If your biopsy comes back normal, you still might try gluten-free for a while. You might be really surprised at which nagging health problems vanish.

You also might think about whether you want to even give your body a chance to develop more autoimmunity. Basically, you can completely avoid the risk of developing a pretty troublesome disease by adopting the gluten-free diet. Remember, you can't "undo" celiac autoimmunity. Once your body learns to attack itself, you become at-risk for other problems like autoimmune thyroid disease and nerve damage.

angiegoo Newbie
angiegoo
Posted
  • Author

People with positive blood tests have been followed in studies. Some people with anti-tTG convert to celiac and a LOT of people with anti-endomysial antibodies convert. You didn't mention getting anti-endomysial done.

If your biopsy comes back normal, you still might try gluten-free for a while. You might be really surprised at which nagging health problems vanish.

You also might think about whether you want to even give your body a chance to develop more autoimmunity. Basically, you can completely avoid the risk of developing a pretty troublesome disease by adopting the gluten-free diet. Remember, you can't "undo" celiac autoimmunity. Once your body learns to attack itself, you become at-risk for other problems like autoimmune thyroid disease and nerve damage.

Ok, thanks. I guess it would be harder to go gluten free, if I haven't officially been diagnosed as celiac...people wouldn't really understand why I would make that choice if my results come back negative.

In a way I'm hoping the biopsy result come back showing signs of damage.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Ok, thanks. I guess it would be harder to go gluten free, if I haven't officially been diagnosed as celiac...people wouldn't really understand why I would make that choice if my results come back negative.

In a way I'm hoping the biopsy result come back showing signs of damage.

For your sake I hope it does also. Keep in mind that not all celiac symptoms are gut related. I do hope you do at least a dietary trial. You may discover that things you never dreamed could be related to celiac resolve. If your producing antibodies that are showing up in blood work damage is being done somewhere.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Ok, thanks. I guess it would be harder to go gluten free, if I haven't officially been diagnosed as celiac...people wouldn't really understand why I would make that choice if my results come back negative.

In a way I'm hoping the biopsy result come back showing signs of damage.

I do hope you try the diet at least. If it turns you you feel better gluten-free, it's easy to justify. "No, I don't have celiac but I sure am happier without these minor health problems."

If it makes no difference, you probably don't need to be strictly gluten free. The celiac experts at the conference I saw think folks with "latent celiac" (this is what you would be with negative biopsy) or first-degree relatives with celiac are wisest to go light on the gluten. It's not a matter of the strict celiac diet, but rather doing things like cooking rice and potatoes at home instead of eating bread, and choosing different grains for your breakfast cereals. They think eating less gluten lowers your risk of becoming fully celiac.

angiegoo Newbie
angiegoo
Posted
  • Author

Great, thanks everyone for the helpful info. I think I'm going to wait for the results and consider limiting my gluten intake regardless of what happens.

  • 2 weeks later...
angiegoo Newbie
angiegoo
Posted
  • Author

Hi all,

I finally found out my biopsy results. I spoke with my doc over the phone and he told me there was 'some early stages of celiac disease found...' and given my history and bloodwork I probably should 'try going gluten free for a few months'.

Even though he didn't solidly say that I have celiac, I think that from what I've read here on the forum, I can safely say 'I am celiac.' I don't think any damage would appear on a biopsy if you weren't celiac, would it?

Anyways, a gluten free diet is now underway, which I intend to stick to beyond a few months...I'm hoping it won't be too hard to get used to!

Thanks everyone for your help :)

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Hi all,

I finally found out my biopsy results. I spoke with my doc over the phone and he told me there was 'some early stages of celiac disease found...' and given my history and bloodwork I probably should 'try going gluten free for a few months'.

Even though he didn't solidly say that I have celiac, I think that from what I've read here on the forum, I can safely say 'I am celiac.' I don't think any damage would appear on a biopsy if you weren't celiac, would it?

Anyways, a gluten free diet is now underway, which I intend to stick to beyond a few months...I'm hoping it won't be too hard to get used to!

Thanks everyone for your help :)

I know this sounds funny but I am relieved that the biopsy was positive. Yes you can now say you have celiac. I am very thankful for you that the damage is in the early stages. The lifestyle does take a bit of getting used to but you can do it. You may find a bit of withdrawl but not all do. Ask any questions you need to you. We are here for you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,874
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Kelly Bates
    Newest Member
    Kelly Bates
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Refractory Celiac disease - what to do

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Being low in B12, Folate B9, ferritin, zinc and copper sounds consistent with anemia which can often occur with Celiac.  What did your doctor recommend? What about your Vitamin D?  It helps regulate the immune system.  
    • ehb
      Refractory Celiac disease - what to do

      By ehb · Posted

      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      Waiting on biopsy after positive bloodwork, but also not really believing this is real

      By Alibu · Posted

      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
    • trents
      Virus, celiac disease or both?

      By trents · Posted

      That's just it. When they are doing an EGD, even with biopsy, if they aren't thinking about celiac disease they may miss it. They should take several samples from both the duodenum and the duodenum bulb. Damage can be patchy and easily missed if sampling isn't through. And patch damage may explain lack of dramatic symptoms. Let me assure you that we frequently have posters on this forum who were silent celiacs for years and were diagnosed incidentally with celiac disease when their docs were checking for other things. They developed other medical problems such as anemia or vitamin and mineral deficiencies, neurological deficits, Hashimodo's thyroid, osteoporois, etc. - non GI symptoms - but their docs recognized those problems as often connected to celiac disease and had them checked for celiac disease, both blood antibody testing and biopsy, and found damage. A couple of years ago the Mayo Clinic did a large study involving over 300 people. They started with those officially diagnosed with celiac disease and also tested their first degree relatives. They found that almost 50% of  the first degree relatives tested positive for celiac disease and many or most were totally caught by surprise because they were largely asymptomatic. Their diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. I really don't have anything more to say. You have some decisions to make.
    • knitty kitty
      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Blood tests are affected by what you've had to eat in the previous day or two and any vitamin supplements you've taken in the past month or two.   If you have been taking vitamins before the time of the blood test, the vitamins supplements could mask a deficiency.  So get the tests before supplementing, or allow eight to twelve weeks for the supplements to wear off.    The thing with blood tests is that they measure what is in the blood, not what is stored inside organs and tissues where vitamins are actually utilized, and may miss subclinical deficiencies.  In times of shortages, the brain can order cells to release their stored vitamins into the blood stream in order to keep important organs like the brain and heart functioning.   Overall, getting blood tests for deficiencies is a good idea if it's available to you.  Ask for an Erythrocyte Transketolace test for Thiamine deficiency.  If you're deficient in any of the B vitamins, take a B Complex with all the B's in it.  The eight B vitamins work with one another like an orchestra.  Supplementing just one can throw the others off.  
×
×
  • Create New...