Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dq2/dq8 Results


bilyjimbob

Recommended Posts

bilyjimbob Newbie

So I finally got my results for dq2/dq8 and they were negative...

My question is, is that conclusive? Or can those be negative and someone still have celiac?

I'd been off gluten for a couple months before the test, can that affect this test?

One last thing, can you not have celiac and just be gluten intolerant?

Any info is appreciated

Thanks,

Jorden


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Korwyn Explorer

So I finally got my results for dq2/dq8 and they were negative...

My question is, is that conclusive? Or can those be negative and someone still have celiac?

I'd been off gluten for a couple months before the test, can that affect this test?

One last thing, can you not have celiac and just be gluten intolerant?

Any info is appreciated

Thanks,

Jorden

Negative on the genetic test means you do not show the known markers predisposing you to celiac disease. However there are a couple people on the boards here who have celiac disease or Gluten intolerance (or have family members that do) who also did not show any of the known markers. While this would indicate you probably have a reduced risk, there are still many unknown genetic and environmental factors leading to the development of celiac disease.

Being off gluten will not affect the genetic test.

You can most certainly be gluten intolerant and not have celiac disease. My boss doesn't have celiac disease but he is severely gluten intolerant. He develops such joint pain that he has had to call in sick from accidental ingestion of a couple of bites of mole sauce made with flour instead of cornstarch.,

nora-n Rookie

There are a few people here that are diagnosed celiacs with other genes,

another one was mistyped as not having DQ8 when she had DQ8 after all, and some half genes are around too.

Also, some DQ2,2 have been posting here.

Most of these with other genes have a hard time getting diagnosed, but some do get a diagnosis.

All in all, you cannot use the gene test to exclude celiac.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You can't use the gene tests as a conclusive yes you have it or no you don't and never will. I am a firmly diagnosed celiac without either DQ2 or DQ8, I have a double DQ9. IMHO it makes no difference if you are celiac or 'gluten intolerant' if your body is reacting to gluten you need to be just as strict with either label.

Skylark Collaborator

I think folks who aren't DQ2/DQ8 should make sure their doctors rule out other conditions like inflammatory bowel disease or Crohn's. (Well, really everyone should but without DQ2 or DQ8 the risk of IBD and celiac is similar.) You can absolutely be celiac or gluten intolerant with other HLA-DQ genes but it's less common than with DQ2 or DQ8.

nora-n Rookie

I am double DQ5 and Hadjivassiliou found that 20% of his gluten ataxia patients are DQ1 (DQ5 and DQ6 are DQ1)

There are even three forums for people like that so it is not so uncommon. (the DQ1 gluten thing. Also, they are way way more sensitive to small amounts of gluten than the DQ2 people)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,330
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    TamSta214
    Newest Member
    TamSta214
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • somethinglikeolivia
      Responding to both of your replies: thank you so much!! That makes a lot of sense and helps me feel better about it - I really appreciate the clarification and recommendations. You guys have been very helpful and this site is a gift. Thanks again! 
    • trents
      I think giving attention to the main sources of exposure such as direct consumption of gluten and gross cross contamination with reasonable attention to handwashing and thorough counter top cleaning and dishwashing should cover cross contamination issues. The biggest precautions would be eating in restaurants and at other's homes. Don't get paranoia over it and don't make trouble where there is none. As far a what you communicate with your physicians, just tell them what you know. Strongly positive antibody tests, negative biopsy, positive symptoms when consuming gluten with clearing of symptoms when gluten free.  
    • trents
      Occasionally we do see anomalies where celiac antibody tests are positive but biopsies are negative, and even visa versa. Sometimes, damage to the small bowel lining is patchy and unless numerous samples are taken from various areas, the damage can be missed. So, there's that issue as well. I think in your situation, the tell-tale indicator is the difference in symptoms between when you were off gluten and when you were consuming it.   
    • somethinglikeolivia
      Okay, that makes sense - so based off of the 90% odds that it is positive, it’s worth switching to fully gluten-free? How strict do I need to be with cross-contamination, handling, etc. Is it something that can go by feel, for instance if I feel okay making my family sandwiches and handling the bread as opposed to eating it, or is it something that is causing silent damage even if I feel fine? Also, do I make it clear to my rheumatologist and other medical providers that I am celiac? Or will they veto that due to negative endoscopy? Thanks again for the help!
    • Scott Adams
      If you look at the article that I shared you will notice that "The test is estimated to have a sensitivity of approximately 90%, which means that it correctly identifies 90% of people with celiac disease. It also has a high specificity of around 95%, which means that it correctly identifies 95% of people who do not have celiac disease," so your results indicate that you very likely have celiac disease, especially if you also have symptoms while eating gluten that go away when you stop eating it (although many celiacs don't have obvious symptoms).
×
×
  • Create New...