Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Levels Of Celiac


rweintritt

Recommended Posts

rweintritt Newbie

I was just reading about the contamination of oats. On one of the threads, I read a big debate about whether there are varying levels of Celiac. It caught my attention because about 4 months ago my doctor tested me for Celiac. Several times my results came back borderline. I was consistently a few points below diagnosis but he said that I was definitely borderline and should avoid gluten. So, wouldn't borderline be a varying level of celiac?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest Viola

Celiac Disease, is just that. There is no border line on having the disease. However, there is varying degrees of damage to be detected during the tests. You should be on a gluten free diet, and perhaps be thankful that you don't have serious damage as yet. If the tests are showing little damage, perhaps you will be lucky and heal quickly with the diet. That's not to say that you can ever go off the diet, just that your symptoms hopefully will go away quicker on it :rolleyes: Now ... have I really confused you? :huh:

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

There are not degrees of celiac disease but there are degrees of symptoms. Some people may have worse reactions and so forth but the people who don't get bad reactions are in the exact same boat of having to avoid ANY amount of gluten.

Some people may have had worse damage then others because of going undiagnosed for so long but again it does not effect the diet they need to follow.

If you are celiac then you are celiac...no levels about it...

hope this cleared up some questions about it

rweintritt Newbie

Well, I only had blood tests, not biopsies. So, I don't know about damage that I may have. I have definitely felt better being on the diet and last week I ate pizza and thought I was going to die. I couldn't get out of bed for a week, but that never happened before, when I was eating gluten. So, obviously my body has adjusted to being gluten-free. I guess my confusion is in the interpretation of the blood results. I had a much higher than normal antibody count, but it wasn't quite enough to diagnose Celiac. So, what does all this mean? Does the antibody count correlate to the amount of damage? Thanks to you who have replied.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
Does the antibody count correlate to the amount of damage?

Not necessarily. Antibodies in the blood indicate there is a negative response to gluten going on in your body. Some of the time when there are antibodies present there will be some damage..to what extent of damage that can vary. Other times damage may not have arised yet. I think it depends how long the celiac has been activated and gone undetected. The longer you go with it undetected the more damage I would think you would get.

ianm Apprentice

For me the symptoms seemed to have been there since day 1. Sometimes they would get real bad and sometimes it went into remission. It wasn't until my mid-20's that it became chronic and by my early 30's I was in real bad shape. The level of symptoms can vary but sooner or later they do catch up with you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.