Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Rolled Sugar Cookies?


KirsiOlson

Recommended Posts

KirsiOlson Newbie

Hi, this is my first post.

I've known I had celiac for all of my 16 year old life and for a time I ignored it, and during that time I realized I utterly adore sugar cookies! But ever since I went back to a gluten-free diet, I haven't been able to find a sugar cookie that I can actually use..

So. Does anyone know a tried and true rolled sugar cookie recipe that doesn't use xanthan gum, sorghum, milk, nuts, chocolate, corn syrup, cream of tartar or butter?

Thank you in advance.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Little Northern Bakehouse
Holidaily Brewing Co.



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Holidaily Brewing Co.


halfrunner Apprentice

If you have an old family recipe that you love for sugar cookies, you could use that, substituting in palm oil shortening for the butter. If your recipe calls for milk, you could easily substitute almond, rice, or soy milk without any problems. I use rice flour for sugar cookies for DH, and have found cookies are just fine without xanthan gum.

Here's my recipe:

1 c. sugar

1 c. butter

1 egg (beaten)

1 1/2 c. rice flour

1 tsp. baking soda

1 tsp. vanilla

1 tsp. salt

3/4 c. potato, corn or tapioca starch

M&Ms or Reese's Pieces are great in these cookies.

Cream butter and sugar until pale yellow (you can use a mixer for this step). Stir in the remaining ingredients and mix well (by hand). Drop onto cookie sheets by the tablespoonful.

Optional rolled: Roll out to desired thickness using extra potato (or whatever) starch. Cut out, place on cookie sheet.

Bake at 325 degrees for 12-15 min. (I always use parchment paper to avoid sticking.)

For chocolate chip cookies: use 1/2 c. regular sugar + 1/2 c. brown sugar and your favorite chocolate chips.

halfrunner Apprentice

Ignore this one...I couldn't figure out how to delete my boo boo. :blink:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,328
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CGW
    Newest Member
    CGW
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Holidaily Brewing Co.


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Lakefront Brewery



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • somethinglikeolivia
      Responding to both of your replies: thank you so much!! That makes a lot of sense and helps me feel better about it - I really appreciate the clarification and recommendations. You guys have been very helpful and this site is a gift. Thanks again! 
    • trents
      I think giving attention to the main sources of exposure such as direct consumption of gluten and gross cross contamination with reasonable attention to handwashing and thorough counter top cleaning and dishwashing should cover cross contamination issues. The biggest precautions would be eating in restaurants and at other's homes. Don't get paranoia over it and don't make trouble where there is none. As far a what you communicate with your physicians, just tell them what you know. Strongly positive antibody tests, negative biopsy, positive symptoms when consuming gluten with clearing of symptoms when gluten free.  
    • trents
      Occasionally we do see anomalies where celiac antibody tests are positive but biopsies are negative, and even visa versa. Sometimes, damage to the small bowel lining is patchy and unless numerous samples are taken from various areas, the damage can be missed. So, there's that issue as well. I think in your situation, the tell-tale indicator is the difference in symptoms between when you were off gluten and when you were consuming it.   
    • somethinglikeolivia
      Okay, that makes sense - so based off of the 90% odds that it is positive, it’s worth switching to fully gluten-free? How strict do I need to be with cross-contamination, handling, etc. Is it something that can go by feel, for instance if I feel okay making my family sandwiches and handling the bread as opposed to eating it, or is it something that is causing silent damage even if I feel fine? Also, do I make it clear to my rheumatologist and other medical providers that I am celiac? Or will they veto that due to negative endoscopy? Thanks again for the help!
    • Scott Adams
      If you look at the article that I shared you will notice that "The test is estimated to have a sensitivity of approximately 90%, which means that it correctly identifies 90% of people with celiac disease. It also has a high specificity of around 95%, which means that it correctly identifies 95% of people who do not have celiac disease," so your results indicate that you very likely have celiac disease, especially if you also have symptoms while eating gluten that go away when you stop eating it (although many celiacs don't have obvious symptoms).
×
×
  • Create New...