Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lab Test, Will Insurance Pay?


bincongo

Recommended Posts

bincongo Contributor

My daughter has decided to go for gene testing and I gave her the information for using Mayo Clinic labs but I am wondering if her insurance will pay for it. Does she need to contact her insurance company in order to have part of it payed for and to see which lab they use? I don't know what insurance company she has. When the doctor orders it is there a certain code he should use based on the fact that I, her mother has Celiac?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



adab8ca Enthusiast

My daughter has decided to go for gene testing and I gave her the information for using Mayo Clinic labs but I am wondering if her insurance will pay for it. Does she need to contact her insurance company in order to have part of it payed for and to see which lab they use? I don't know what insurance company she has. When the doctor orders it is there a certain code he should use based on the fact that I, her mother has Celiac?

She should contact her insurance company. In Canada, I know it is not covered and even the regular Celiac blood tests are not covered by insurance (although the biopsy is).

Has she had other testing done that is inconclusive? The gene test will not tell you if you have Celiac, just that you have the genes to get it. I think lots of people have the genetic markers and only a small fraction ever get the disease.

bincongo Contributor

She should contact her insurance company. In Canada, I know it is not covered and even the regular Celiac blood tests are not covered by insurance (although the biopsy is).

Has she had other testing done that is inconclusive? The gene test will not tell you if you have Celiac, just that you have the genes to get it. I think lots of people have the genetic markers and only a small fraction ever get the disease.

She has not had any testing done. My sister has the gene and symptoms for Celiac so she is getting more testing done. I want my daughter to have gene testing done because I am a known Celiac. I think she needs to know if she has the gene first since she doesn't have symptoms that I know of. If insurance companies will only pay for the antibody testing then I need to know that. It seems backward though because if she is negative than it only means she doesn't have it now. I would think the gene testing is more worthwhile.

Skylark Collaborator

The value of the testing depends on your view. Your daughter already has a "positive" genetic test, as a first-degree relative of a celiac. It is abundantly clear that the DQ2 and DQ8 tests do not tell the whole story anyway. What if those aren't the celiac genes in your family? What you really need to know is if there is intestinal damage that could hurt her absorption of nutrients for the baby, right?

There is no harm in the genetic tests, but your daughter really needs to have a celiac panel preferably with the new deamidated gliadin peptide test. It would be awful for her to get a false sense of security from genetic tests.

As far as insurance, it only covered my Mom after she had the negative normal celiac panel.

kareng Grand Master

The univ of Chicago Celiac Center sent me the stuff for genetic tests to be sent to Kimball labs. They are $395. Just a little FYI.

I think it would be better spent to get the celiac blood tests to see if she has active celiac. I think they were about $300 but our insurance paid for my kids to get them because I have it. It is a " family history" code. If she is having any symptoms, particullary GI ones, that would be an excellent primary code to justify the tests using the family history as a second or third or fourth.

kareng Grand Master

She has not had any testing done. My sister has the gene and symptoms for Celiac so she is getting more testing done. I want my daughter to have gene testing done because I am a known Celiac. I think she needs to know if she has the gene first since she doesn't have symptoms that I know of. If insurance companies will only pay for the antibody testing then I need to know that. It seems backward though because if she is negative than it only means she doesn't have it now. I would think the gene testing is more worthwhile.

Just re- read your post and saw she doesn't have symptoms. I choose not to get my boys gene tested because:

They are still researching the genes involved in this disease. I would hate to give them a false sense of " I can't have it" in case they come up with more info

I didn't want the positive genes on their medical records. The way insurance companies are, I don't want them denied insurance or denied coverage because it's a pre- existing condition.

I have been told that the military and perhaps other programs will not accept people with celiac disease. Having the gene doesn't mean you have celiac disease but I'm afraid they will decide that is a reason not to take them ( if they chose that).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    2. - trents replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    3. - Paulaannefthimiou posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,849
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jadelucia
    Newest Member
    Jadelucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
    • trents
      I think it is wise to seek a second opinion from a GI doc and to go on a gluten free diet in the meantime. The GI doc may look at all the evidence, including the biopsy report, and conclude you don't need anything else to reach a dx of celiac disease and so, there would be no need for a gluten challenge. But if the GI doc does want to do more testing, you can worry about the gluten challenge at that time. But between now and the time of the appointment, if your symptoms improve on a gluten free diet, that is more evidence. Just keep in mind that if a gluten challenge is called for, the bare minimum challenge length is two weeks of the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten, which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. But, I would count on giving it four weeks to be sure.
    • Paulaannefthimiou
      Are Bobresmill gluten free oats ok for sensitive celiacs?
    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
    • trents
      Let me suggest an adjustment to your terminology. "Celiac disease" and "gluten intolerance" are the same. The other gluten disorder you refer to is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which is often referred to as being "gluten sensitive". Having said that, the reality is there is still much inconsistency in how people use these terms. Since celiac disease does damage to the small bowel lining it often results in nutritional deficiencies such as anemia. NCGS does not damage the small bowel lining so your history of anemia may suggest you have celiac disease as opposed to NCGS. But either way, a gluten-free diet is in order. NCGS can cause bodily damage in other ways, particularly to neurological systems.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.