Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Only Anti-gliadin Antibodies?


Searcher

Recommended Posts

Searcher Newbie

Hi all, I am new here. I have been going through much of what many of you seem to have gone through. Many years of half-answers that lead to more questions. I have an appt with a gastro next week and wanted to get your opinions before I go.

My symptoms vary from weakness, bowel problems, anxiety/depression, poor memory, raynaud's, vision, gerd, etc. The only lab results that have ever come back positive are the ANA, Rheumatoid Factor, and Anti-Gliadin antibodies. When the Anti-Gliadin came back (IGG was 38, IGA negative), they retested (IGG was 68 and IGA was 21). They apparently don't do anti-endomysial anymore and instead did a tranglutaminase that was negative. With my symptoms, a biopsy was done (a few years ago) and that was negative.

So here I am years later still with the same symptoms and trying again with another gastro. I was hoping for some advice or ideas. Doesn't the fact that some of the results I got were high must mean something even though not all the tests or biopsy were positve?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



steve-o Apprentice

I'm in the same boat you're in....high Anti-Gliadin, but all other tests negative.

I've been looking high and low for a concrete answer, but still don't have one. Everything I've read or heard, says that anti-gliadin alone doesn't indicate celiac disease.

Some sources say it means you "might" have a gluten intolerance, but it may also mean nothing. Something like 25% of the general population has elevated anti-gliadin antibodies, so doctors generally don't believe it indicates anything. Of course, this begs the question; why bother doing this test? I've yet to hear an answer for this either.

Anyhow, in the end, your best bet is to just listen to your body. Try going on a strict gluten free diet for a few months, and see if you feel better, or if your symptoms disappear. This should give you a good indication of whether or not your body is reacting to gluten.

Good luck,

Steve

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
Some sources say it means you "might" have a gluten intolerance, but it may also mean nothing. Something like 25% of the general population has elevated anti-gliadin antibodies, so doctors generally don't believe it indicates anything. Of course, this begs the question; why bother doing this test? I've yet to hear an answer for this either.

Usually the antibodies alone detect a reaction to gluten. They are not usually enough to diagnose you though...they usually use a full panel with other tests as well...but if just those show up that can mean it is just starting to activate in your body. It's not a useless test to have done it is just not usually sufficient for a diagnosis alone.

I would definitely investigate further though because there is obviously some reaction your body has to gluten.

25% of the population do not have elevated antibodies to my understanding. about 25-30% have the celiac gene but do not necessarily have celiac activated(they are just predisposed)

Searcher Newbie

Thanks for the advice. If the anti-gliadin antibodies can represent other things, does anybody know what the other possibilities are?

skbird Contributor

Hi Searcher -

I'm curious about your ANA, Rh factor, Raynauds, etc. I was diagnosed several years back as having Raynauds which went away after about 4 years. Recently, my doc was trying to screen me for any other autoimmune stuff and found I had a positive ANA (1:320) and a nucleolar pattern. My Rh factor was negative. At about the time of the test my hands started flaring up again. As a result I am going on Friday to see a rheumatologist.

Have you gotten any info about your test results in these areas? Have you been diagnosed with a connective tissue disease? I'm wondering what I"m going to find out on Friday, if anything.

I have been gluten free since last October so it's not gluten that is firing up my system (though the lack of gluten could be keeping it from being worse).

Thanks for any info.

Stephanie

Searcher Newbie

The raynaud's showed up first by itself about 6 years ago. The ANA came back 1:320 /1:640 nucleolar. The rf came back back pretty high at one point later. Nobody came up with anything definitive after that because all other tests they did were negative. The anti-gliadin was the only other thing that came back positive. Skbird-your raynaud's just went away on its own?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,162
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carolyn harkless
    Newest Member
    Carolyn harkless
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.