Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing For Cd


lgranott

Recommended Posts

lgranott Rookie

I have been on a gluten free diet for nearly 8 months and am feeling much better then Ihave for a very long time. I have not however been tested for celiac disease. If I am feeling better, should I get tested and if so, don't I have to have gluten in my system when tested?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Unless you need an offical diagnosis for some reason then I would not bother to get tested. If you are gluten free and feel better I would go with that. If you did want to be tested though, you would need to be on gluten for about 3 months and eat equivalent to about 3 pieces of bread every day for that long.

lgranott Rookie

Thank you! Definately NOT worth it... The thought of bread is painful :rolleyes: It was suggested that I get tested and have a biopsy done. Is there any benefit to having a biopsy done?

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I had a definite diagnosis by blood tests alone. Doctor felt there was not a need for a biopsy with the results.

The tTG blood test is usually elevated when there is damage done and mine was almost triple what it should have been. That test is said to be taking the place of biopsies in the near future for kids too(its a very specific test) So in my opinion a complete blood panel is just as good for a diagnosis as a biopsy is.

A biopsy can be good but a negative result will not rule celiac out. There may not be damage yet, or there may be sporadic damage that they miss.

With an official diagnosis there can be positives but also negatives because it is harder to get insurance.

There are then positives and negatives to both ways so you have to decide if it is worth it for you. At the point you are at, if I was in that position, I would not think it would be worth all the pain when there is a chance it could be inaccurate

lgranott Rookie

Makes sense. I guess part of me wants to know if it isn't celiac b/c there is already so much I can't/won't eat. Vegetarian (choice) and can't eat dairy...Ahh!! There isn't much left when I take out gluten... That isn't really true, I have plenty to eat, but not easy when I am not at home.

I have been very careful about not letting gluten near me, but every once in a while I wonder if I really need to be as careful as someone with celiac. And sometimes consider trying gluten to see, but that is also very inaccurate (and painful sounding).

Do I just live the rest of my life gluten free???

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

You could get back on gluten and then get a blood test done in a few months. Make sure you get a complete panel done though which consists of the following:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

They usually do blood tests first.

Also, if you get a gene test done if it is negative you likely do not have celiac but you could just have a gluten intolerance. If you do have a main gene for it you would have the predisposition to it and could have it.

You could try out an Enterolab to.

If you have celiac you need to be gluten free for life. If you are gluten intolerant you should be gluten free for life but the damage is not done with just the gluten intolerance.

julie5914 Contributor

What about a gene test? Can't those be done if you are not on gluten? I haven't had one, but that is the gist I got.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Your gene test can be done at anytime as far as I know. Genes can't change with your diet.

celiac3270 Collaborator
What about a gene test? Can't those be done if you are not on gluten? I haven't had one, but that is the gist I got.

You can absolutely do a gene test any time you want...on or off a gluten-free diet. As Kaiti said, your genes do not change with your diet...your antibody levels will, which is why the other tests need to be done while on gluten, but the gene test can be done at any time.

jazzyjess Newbie

i have a similiar situation my blood did not detect coeliacs but i have been on the diet for 4 months and am feeling so much better because of it it would be good to know whether it is coeliac disease or just an intolerance though most symptoms point towards coeliacs and my doctor says it almost definately is do any of the tests work when you are on a gluten free diet cos it would be horrid to go through it all again just to be tested

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,960
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PMcCauley
    Newest Member
    PMcCauley
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
    • Scott Adams
      This article might also be helpful, as you could have DH: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/understanding-dermatitis-herpetiformis-the-skin-manifestation-of-celiac-disease-r6361/
    • trents
      I would think that as long as you keep your food on a wrapper or on a paper plate you would not be at risk for cross contamination. You may be overthinking it all which is common for those in the first year of the celiac journey. But let me ask you. Are you feeling self-conscious about having a celiac diagnosis? I notice the term "isolated" in your thread title. Do you fear being shunned? I offer this video clip for your consideration:  
×
×
  • Create New...