Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

How Accurate Are Blood Tests


suziq0805

Recommended Posts

suziq0805 Enthusiast

Last week I had blood drawn for testing for celiac disease. My 10 month old son may have it- he severely vomits after eating gluten/wheat, but tolerates gluten-free food fine. So since I realized I do have some symptoms of celiac disease we decided to test me to find out if I have it. The nurse today told me that the doctor said my test results came back ok, but that I could call and speak with him more about it tomorrow if I wanted to (he wasn't in the clinic today). My son's allergy tests came back negative as well, so it looks like celiac disease is still a possibility for him. The doctor said that testing in young kids isn't very accurate...so how accurate is it for adults? Here's a list of things I've experienced over the last few years:

dizzy spells

gas

abdominal cramps

delayed puberty (I think anyway....compared to my friends as I was growing up I went through puberty later)

muscle pain and weakness

some nerve pain and tingling/numbness

slightly elevated ANA in bloodwork a few years ago

anemic after giving birth to my son- but that got better after some iron pills

I was actually kind of disappointed when the results came back fine. I don't WANT to have celia, but I thought it could be an answer to everything I experienced over the last few years. The muscle pain and weakness almost took away my career, but I was never diagnosed with anything. So if I was positive for celiac it would have been a bit of relief since I often thought I was crazy for always thinking something was up when doctor after doctor couldn't find anything. The last couple years have been better for me and I don't experience the symptoms nearly as often and when i do they're not as intense.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Takala Enthusiast

The blood tests are not completely accurate, but I don't know for sure the % of false negatives.

I do know that the disease is woefully underdiagnosed, and that it is frequently missed, because the standard sequence is that they want a positive blood test to then give the go ahead for doing a biopsy.

You can do one of two things, either a diet challenge where you test yourself to see if you feel better on a gluten free diet, or get medical or an otc genetic test and see if you are a carrier for some of the celiac or gluten intolerant genes. (if you son is formally diagnosed, he had to have inherited it from somebody.... ;) ) Having the genes will not "prove" anything other than you have the official possibility of being in the class of people who can be vulnerable to developing celiac or gluten intolerance. So it would make it more likely.

If the gluten free diet resolves your symptoms, there you have it.

I have no positive bloodwork, but you do not want to get to the point I was at with the peripheral neuropathy (numbness in my hands, legs, and feet) and gluten ataxia (dizzyness) that I had, plus the bone loss in my spine and the chronic kidney problems, vision problems, plus the other stuff, and end up still being told that It's All In Your Head after a brain scan shows bright spots. At least continue to research and test yourself, even if it gets down to you are doing your own diet testing, if the Medical Profession can't get its act together.

If it turns out your son is diagnosed positive, you may want to go on a gluten free diet with him at home, to help prevent cross contamination and to make household cooking and eating easier and to provide emotional support.

shopgirl Contributor

The false negative number is usually said to be about 20%. That's why so many people are encouraged to at least try the diet to see if they improve.

And remember that the blood tests can only test for Celiac Disease

ravenwoodglass Mentor

When the tests are postive they are positive but false negatives are pretty common, as another poster said about 20% and I have seen up to 30%. The same applies to biopsies. Also children have an even higher rate of false negatives than adults. Do give the diet a good strict try after testing is done. The body can tell you the answer better than the tests can. It does take some time to heal so give it at least a couple of months.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    5. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,189
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Lhughes327
    Newest Member
    Lhughes327
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
×
×
  • Create New...