Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

How Accurate Are Blood Tests


suziq0805

Recommended Posts

suziq0805 Enthusiast

Last week I had blood drawn for testing for celiac disease. My 10 month old son may have it- he severely vomits after eating gluten/wheat, but tolerates gluten-free food fine. So since I realized I do have some symptoms of celiac disease we decided to test me to find out if I have it. The nurse today told me that the doctor said my test results came back ok, but that I could call and speak with him more about it tomorrow if I wanted to (he wasn't in the clinic today). My son's allergy tests came back negative as well, so it looks like celiac disease is still a possibility for him. The doctor said that testing in young kids isn't very accurate...so how accurate is it for adults? Here's a list of things I've experienced over the last few years:

dizzy spells

gas

abdominal cramps

delayed puberty (I think anyway....compared to my friends as I was growing up I went through puberty later)

muscle pain and weakness

some nerve pain and tingling/numbness

slightly elevated ANA in bloodwork a few years ago

anemic after giving birth to my son- but that got better after some iron pills

I was actually kind of disappointed when the results came back fine. I don't WANT to have celia, but I thought it could be an answer to everything I experienced over the last few years. The muscle pain and weakness almost took away my career, but I was never diagnosed with anything. So if I was positive for celiac it would have been a bit of relief since I often thought I was crazy for always thinking something was up when doctor after doctor couldn't find anything. The last couple years have been better for me and I don't experience the symptoms nearly as often and when i do they're not as intense.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Takala Enthusiast

The blood tests are not completely accurate, but I don't know for sure the % of false negatives.

I do know that the disease is woefully underdiagnosed, and that it is frequently missed, because the standard sequence is that they want a positive blood test to then give the go ahead for doing a biopsy.

You can do one of two things, either a diet challenge where you test yourself to see if you feel better on a gluten free diet, or get medical or an otc genetic test and see if you are a carrier for some of the celiac or gluten intolerant genes. (if you son is formally diagnosed, he had to have inherited it from somebody.... ;) ) Having the genes will not "prove" anything other than you have the official possibility of being in the class of people who can be vulnerable to developing celiac or gluten intolerance. So it would make it more likely.

If the gluten free diet resolves your symptoms, there you have it.

I have no positive bloodwork, but you do not want to get to the point I was at with the peripheral neuropathy (numbness in my hands, legs, and feet) and gluten ataxia (dizzyness) that I had, plus the bone loss in my spine and the chronic kidney problems, vision problems, plus the other stuff, and end up still being told that It's All In Your Head after a brain scan shows bright spots. At least continue to research and test yourself, even if it gets down to you are doing your own diet testing, if the Medical Profession can't get its act together.

If it turns out your son is diagnosed positive, you may want to go on a gluten free diet with him at home, to help prevent cross contamination and to make household cooking and eating easier and to provide emotional support.

shopgirl Contributor

The false negative number is usually said to be about 20%. That's why so many people are encouraged to at least try the diet to see if they improve.

And remember that the blood tests can only test for Celiac Disease

ravenwoodglass Mentor

When the tests are postive they are positive but false negatives are pretty common, as another poster said about 20% and I have seen up to 30%. The same applies to biopsies. Also children have an even higher rate of false negatives than adults. Do give the diet a good strict try after testing is done. The body can tell you the answer better than the tests can. It does take some time to heal so give it at least a couple of months.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to cristiana's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Low iron/high normal haemoglobin

    2. - cristiana posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Low iron/high normal haemoglobin

    3. - Scott Adams replied to JForman's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      11

      7yo struggling!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,170
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    yvonne jacobs
    Newest Member
    yvonne jacobs
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Not sure what you mean by "poor iron levels" if 30 is normal (upper end of normal range) and you are 29. (at least, that's how I read your post. Seems to me that your iron (ferritin) is normal, whereas before it was too high (40). At any rate, your post made me curious, so I copy pasted "Does it actually matters if my iron levels are poor, if my hemoglobin is normal" into the google search bar. According to Dr google, it does matter and they had a lot to say about it.
    • cristiana
      Hello All I think I started a thread on this subject some time ago, but now can't find it.  Or possibly it was someone else's thread that I hijacked - and that's why I can't find it! Anyway, I have a rather complicated issue with iron and I'm wondering what to do about it.  Or even if it matters. Pre-menopause, when I was first diagnosed with coeliac,  my ferritin levels were dreadful and I had to supplement.  It soon became apparent that I had to stop, as once my iron anemia cleared up, my hemoglobin levels reached high normal, verging on a condition known as polycythemia.   High normal in my lab is 15.5 for women, and my level has hovered between 15 and 15.5 The highest my ferritin levels have ever been is 40 (30 being normal) since I started my gluten-free journey - I reached that level about three years ago., about a year post menopause.  18 months later my ferritin had gone down to 29, which I think I can explain because I've been avoiding red meat.  This was a conscious decision as I have  discovered that I can keep my hemoglobin levels at safe levels so long as I don't consume too much iron.  My gastroenterologist also told me not to supplement it.     I have recently had a colonoscopy and have done a FIT test to detect bleeding, both came back normal.  So I feel that the reduced iron consumption is probably the reason for this new deficiency.  But I have two questions: A. Does it actually matters if my iron levels are poor, if my hemoglobin is normal?  (I do feel a bit tired, but surely if my hemoglobin levels are normal I shouldn't?) B. Would my last TTG blood result of 10 (cut off point for normal levels at my lab)  be affecting my absorption of iron? Thanks! Cristinaa  
    • Scott Adams
      This would definitely be an interesting study. We did an article on this a while back:  
    • Scott Adams
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      For people of European ancestry, 2% is about average, depending on which study you look at. For Asian ancestry it can be higher. For full Sub-Saharan African ancestry it is zero, but in practice they tend to have trace amounts due to migration back into Africa. While each individual may have 1-3% Neanderthal DNA, it is not always the same DNA that is Neanderthal. Estimates are 20-70% for which parts of the human genome might be Neanderthal in any given individual. Another way of saying this is that 20-70% of the Neanderthal genome survives in the human population. The HLA genotypes that confer susceptibility to celiac (necessary but not sufficient) are known to be of human in origin. There are some other genes known to be associated with a higher probability for getting celiac (with the right HLA genotype) that are associated with Neanderthal DNA. However, there is no correlation between quantity of Neanderthal DNA and probability of getting celiac. Neanderthal DNA is associated with other autoimmune diseases. Lupus, Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis are probably the most strongly associated diseases.
×
×
  • Create New...