Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Does "very High Risk Of Celiac" Really Mean?

goodnews

Recommended Posts

goodnews Apprentice
goodnews
Posted

Just curious what this really means. I have to have a repeat endoscopy as they only took one sample last time that showed signs of celiac. They are doing it again next week because my gene results reflected "VERY high risk" (the person who told me accentuated the word very when she said it) of celiac.What does that even mean?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

Just curious what this really means. I have to have a repeat endoscopy as they only took one sample last time that showed signs of celiac. They are doing it again next week because my gene results reflected "VERY high risk" (the person who told me accentuated the word very when she said it) of celiac.What does that even mean?

Forget the genes, let's look at the rest of this info. The first endo they screwed up and only took 1 sample? The sample showed Celiac's? The GI doc has a kid at an expensive college? (OK that part is just implied by the fact that he/she wants to do another endo for no reason).

The small intestine is 16-20 feet long. It would be easy to take 10 samples and have only one show damage. It is a hopeful finding. Maybe your damage isn't so bad that everywhere you look it is damaged.

goodnews Apprentice
goodnews
Posted
  • Author

Forget the genes, let's look at the rest of this info. The first endo they screwed up and only took 1 sample? The sample showed Celiac's? The GI doc has a kid at an expensive college? (OK that part is just implied by the fact that he/she wants to do another endo for no reason).

The small intestine is 16-20 feet long. It would be easy to take 10 samples and have only one show damage. It is a hopeful finding. Maybe your damage isn't so bad that everywhere you look it is damaged.

Actually I think he is a great doctor for even looking into this. After all, my blood test was negative and for a lot of doctors that would be the end all right there. He only took one sample because he wasn't even looking for celiac and the sample showed inflammation and signs that could be from celiac. He said it wasn't definitive or conclusive. When they found out my gallbladder isn't working right I thought he would just bypass this whole celiac thing but he actually wants to check it out first, so I am supportive. Do I wish they took more samples in the beginning? Yes...but can't change that. Yes, they may not find more damage at all.

I am just curious what would make them say "very high risk" does that mean I got it from both sides, or what?

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

Actually I think he is a great doctor for even looking into this. After all, my blood test was negative and for a lot of doctors that would be the end all right there. He only took one sample because he wasn't even looking for celiac and the sample showed inflammation and signs that could be from celiac. He said it wasn't definitive or conclusive. When they found out my gallbladder isn't working right I thought he would just bypass this whole celiac thing but he actually wants to check it out first, so I am supportive. Do I wish they took more samples in the beginning? Yes...but can't change that. Yes, they may not find more damage at all.

I am just curious what would make them say "very high risk" does that mean I got it from both sides, or what?

I don't know much about the genetics of Celiac. From what I have gathered from people in the genetic world, they look for 2 different genes. Each parent gives us a copy of that gene so they are really looking for 4 gene pieces. The presence of 1 is enough for you to someday, maybe develop Celiac. If you have 2 matching pairs, maybe he thinks your chances are greater. I'm not sure that that is actually supported by science.

I have also been told that those 2 genes that they look for are probably not the whole picture. I know there is an ongoing study that is looking at genetics in Celiacs.

Just because you have 1 or 4 of the genes doesn't mean you will ever develop Celiac. It isn't as straight forward as you have a pair of genes for a white flower & you get a white flower.

Jess, check me & correct if wrong. or expand on this

sb2178 Enthusiast
sb2178
Posted

Yes, it probably means you have two DQ8 genes, which means you have something like a 40 or 50% higher chance of developing celiac than the rest of the population. Get a copy of the results if you want to know exactly which ones you carry.

As always, the genes merely mean it is possible and more likely but not that you have it. Not having the main genes merely means that it is unlikely but not impossible.

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Actually, the fact that your gallbladder is not working well is for us on the board a flag for celiac and should have alerted him to check for it. So many posters on here have gallbladder problems with pain, have their gallbladders removed and the pain remains because it is coming from the celiac which precipitated the gallbladder problems. This is not a medical statement but what I have observed from maybe 100 posts on here from different posters. However, doctors may not recognize the connection because they haven't been taught much about celiac in medical school.

I hope he takes a few more samples next time. :o

P.S. On rereading this, I am sorry for the somewhat snarky tone. It's just that sometimes I get so mad at doctors, and today's one of those days. :unsure:

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

I don't know much about the genetics of Celiac. From what I have gathered from people in the genetic world, they look for 2 different genes. Each parent gives us a copy of that gene so they are really looking for 4 gene pieces. The presence of 1 is enough for you to someday, maybe develop Celiac. If you have 2 matching pairs, maybe he thinks your chances are greater. I'm not sure that that is actually supported by science.

I have also been told that those 2 genes that they look for are probably not the whole picture. I know there is an ongoing study that is looking at genetics in Celiacs.

Just because you have 1 or 4 of the genes doesn't mean you will ever develop Celiac. It isn't as straight forward as you have a pair of genes for a white flower & you get a white flower.

Jess, check me & correct if wrong. or expand on this

I'd buy this, although I disagree with the doc's phrasing of "very high risk".

You probably have 2 copies of one of the genes associated with celiac disease. More people with celiac disease have these genes, but having these genes does NOT mean you will necessarily get celiac disease. Just like having blue eyes puts you at a high risk for being Scandinavian. Most Scandinavians have blue eyes, but having blue eyes does not necessarily mean you are Scandinavian.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Ello's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      You might consider asking for a referral to a RD (Registered Dietician) to help with food choices and planning a diet. Even apart from any gluten issues, you will likely find there are some foods you need to avoid because of the shorter bowel but you may also find that your system may make adjustments over time and that symptoms may improve.
    2. Ello
      - Ello replied to Ello's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      I wish Dr’s would have these discussions with their patients. So frustrating but will continue to do research. Absolutely love this website. I will post any updates on my testing and results. Thank you
    3. trents
      - trents replied to Ello's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      Losing 12" of your small bowel is going to present challenges for you in nutritional uptake because you are losing a significant amount of nutritional absorption surface area. You will need to focus on consuming foods that are nutritionally dense and also probably look at some good supplements. If indeed you are having issues with gluten you will need to...
    4. Ello
      - Ello replied to Ello's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      Yes this information helps. I will continue to be pro active with this issues I am having. More testing to be done. Thank you so much for your response.
    5. trents
      - trents replied to Ello's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      There are two gluten-related disorders that share many of the same symptoms but differ in nature from each other. One is known as celiac disease or "gluten intolerance". By nature, it is an autoimmune disorder, meaning the ingestion of gluten triggers the body to attack it's own tissues, specifically the lining of the small bowel. This attack causes...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,832
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Duhgirl
    Newest Member
    Duhgirl
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      By trents · Posted

      You might consider asking for a referral to a RD (Registered Dietician) to help with food choices and planning a diet. Even apart from any gluten issues, you will likely find there are some foods you need to avoid because of the shorter bowel but you may also find that your system may make adjustments over time and that symptoms may improve.
    • Ello
      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      By Ello · Posted

      I wish Dr’s would have these discussions with their patients. So frustrating but will continue to do research. Absolutely love this website. I will post any updates on my testing and results.  Thank you
    • trents
      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      By trents · Posted

      Losing 12" of your small bowel is going to present challenges for you in nutritional uptake because you are losing a significant amount of nutritional absorption surface area. You will need to focus on consuming foods that are nutritionally dense and also probably look at some good supplements. If indeed you are having issues with gluten you will need to educate yourself as to how gluten is hidden in the food supply. There's more to it than just avoiding the major sources of gluten like bread and pasta. It is hidden in so many things you would never expect to find it in like canned tomato soup and soy sauce just to name a few. It can be in pills and medications.  Also, your "yellow diarrhea, constipation and bloating" though these are classic signs of a gluten disorder, could also be related to the post surgical shorter length of your small bowel causing incomplete processing/digestion of food.
    • Ello
      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      By Ello · Posted

      Yes this information helps. I will continue to be pro active with this issues I am having. More testing to be done. Thank you so much for your response. 
    • trents
      Small Bowel Resection 12 inches

      By trents · Posted

      There are two gluten-related disorders that share many of the same symptoms but differ in nature from each other. One is known as celiac disease or "gluten intolerance". By nature, it is an autoimmune disorder, meaning the ingestion of gluten triggers the body to attack it's own tissues, specifically the lining of the small bowel. This attack causes inflammation and produces antibodies that can be detected in the blood by specific tests like the TTG-IGA test you had. Over time, if gluten is not withheld, this inflammation can cause severe damage to the lining of the small bowel and even result in nutrient deficiency related health issues since the small bowel lining is organ where all the nutrition found in our food is absorbed.  The other is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just "gluten sensitivity") which we know less about and are unsure of the exact mechanism of action. It is not an autoimmune disorder and unlike celiac disease it does not damage the lining of the small bowel, though, like celiac disease, it can cause GI distress and it can also do other kinds of damage to the body. It is thought to be more common than celiac disease. Currently, we cannot test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out to arrive at a diagnosis of NCGS. Both disorders require elimination of gluten from the diet.  Either of these disorders can find their onset at any stage of life. We know that celiac disease has a genetic component but the genes are inactive until awakened by some stress event. About 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% develop active celiac disease. The incidence of NCGS is thought to be considerably higher. I hope this helps.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.