Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Where To Source gluten-free Flours That Are Not Contaminated With Oats?


gfbakingmom

Recommended Posts

gfbakingmom Newbie

I need another two weeks to confirm this, but I am strongly suspecting that Bob's Red Mill products are completely out for us because we are unable to tolerate gluten-free oats. I have learned on this forum that all of their gluten-free flours might be contaminated with oats, and since I began baking with them a lot, our symptoms have returned.

So . . . I am looking for good sources for the following grains that are not processed on machinery that processes wheat, barley, rye, and OATS.

Teff flour

Buckwheat flour

Sorghum flour

Millet flour

Sweet rice flour

Brown rice flour

Tapioca starch

Potato flour and starch

Cornstarch

Cornmeal

Masa harina doesn't bother me so long as I buy Maseca brand.

I would appreciate any ideas. Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eatmeat4good Enthusiast

NutsOnline.com has certified gluten free flours.

I think they have all the ones you mentioned but I didn't specifically check.

I have never gotten sick on their gluten free products.

I like all their stuff that I have tried. My son and I are very sensitive and we haven't had any reactions to anything we got there.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I use Tom Sawyer for nonsweet baking and Pamela's mix for baked goods. I am a very sensitive celiac and have never had an issue with either. I tried early in the diet getting all these different individual flours to make my own mixes but it turned out to be very pricey. Those two have been the most cost effective and safest that I have found.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,160
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.