Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac W/newborn


celiacmama

Recommended Posts

celiacmama Newbie

Hi! I have celiac disease (diagnosed in June '04) and am also a new mom. My son is only 3 mo. old and our pediatrician told us that they typically cannot test children for celiac disease until they are 2 years old. I'm concerned that once he's on solids (which is well before 2 yrs) and he ingests gluten, that it may cause him problems. I'm interested to know if any of you have a young child with celiac disease. If so, when did you have him/her tested? What has your experience been with your child's docs? Should I find a pediatric gastro doc? I want to give my son as much protection from gluten (if he needs it) and teach him the right way to eat as early as possible. Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Usually testing below the age of 2 is inaccurate. When he starts with solid foods keep an eye and see if there are any noticeable reactions and when he is old enough get him tested.

lovegrov Collaborator

Your pediatrician is right. Celiac blood tests are not as accurate in children under 2, and before a certain age (which would be different in different children) would be completely useless.

Most experts these days would say that you should allow your child to eat gluten the same time any other child would eat it. In fact, some recent research (which I can't find the link to) suggests that children who either eat gluten real early or who are delayed past about 12 months, are actually more likely to develop celiac.

richard

Jnkmnky Collaborator

I thought the research said that introducing grains between 4 and 6 months could trigger gluten sensitivity? I can't keep up.

lbsteenwyk Explorer

Yes, a recent study suggests that the best time to introduce gluten to minimize the possibility of developing celiac disease is between 4-6 months of age. There is also evidence that breastfeeding well past the introduction of gluten can have a beneficial impact. If you are breastfeeding, I would suggest continuing for at least 1 year (which is recommended anyway by the American Academy of Pediatrics) to supplement your child as solids are introduced.

lovegrov Collaborator

Four to six months, that's the timeframe I was trying to think of. Anyway, there's seems to be little doubt that most researchers believe that keeping a child from gluten (unless you know they have celiac disease) is more likely to trigger celiac disease once they do eat it -- and eventually they will.

richard

aidansmom Rookie

My son had "typical" celiac disease symptoms. He had lots of tummy problems as an infant - reflux, gassy, rashes, etc - but he did grow on the growth curve. I breastfed and started solids at 6 months. Then he started slowing down on growth and completely stopped growing at 9 months. From 6 months until he was diagnosed at 14 months, he would have loose stools 6-7x/day. I was a first time mom and it took me several months to realize that this was not normal. I had to push him through the system. My dr. kept saying that he was normal. Even though he eventually dropped from 50% to 3% on the growth charts.

I also have a 3 month old and I'm breastfeeding and ingesting gluten. Our dr. suggested getting the genetic test in the meantime. We plan to give him gluten at 6 months and watch for the diarrhea and growth.

By the way, gluten DOES go through breastmilk. My son would have severe reactions if I ate a french fry that was contaminated from the oil.

Congrats on your little one!! I hope he stays Celiac free.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Merika Contributor

I was diagnosed with celiac when my ds was almost 2 yrs. At first, everything with my ds stayed the same. But I realized I could not (would not) prepare gluten foods for him and also have crumbs and sticky gluten fingers all over the house. In addition, he was having some allergy symptoms/possible slight celiac symptoms, so he went gluten-free.

If your child seems perfectly healthy, just introduce foods like you normally would (when he gets old enough) and watch. Personally, I would be tempted to only feed him gluten-free when he's with you and around the house until he's much older. Let the dad, and other friends and relatives feed him gluten foods when they go out. Little kids are MESSY, and they should be :) but there is no need to gluten yourself by accident just so they can eat gluten. It's not necessary for humans to eat gluten! :)

Merika

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    2. - trents replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    3. - Paulaannefthimiou posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,849
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jadelucia
    Newest Member
    Jadelucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
    • trents
      I think it is wise to seek a second opinion from a GI doc and to go on a gluten free diet in the meantime. The GI doc may look at all the evidence, including the biopsy report, and conclude you don't need anything else to reach a dx of celiac disease and so, there would be no need for a gluten challenge. But if the GI doc does want to do more testing, you can worry about the gluten challenge at that time. But between now and the time of the appointment, if your symptoms improve on a gluten free diet, that is more evidence. Just keep in mind that if a gluten challenge is called for, the bare minimum challenge length is two weeks of the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten, which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. But, I would count on giving it four weeks to be sure.
    • Paulaannefthimiou
      Are Bobresmill gluten free oats ok for sensitive celiacs?
    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
    • trents
      Let me suggest an adjustment to your terminology. "Celiac disease" and "gluten intolerance" are the same. The other gluten disorder you refer to is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which is often referred to as being "gluten sensitive". Having said that, the reality is there is still much inconsistency in how people use these terms. Since celiac disease does damage to the small bowel lining it often results in nutritional deficiencies such as anemia. NCGS does not damage the small bowel lining so your history of anemia may suggest you have celiac disease as opposed to NCGS. But either way, a gluten-free diet is in order. NCGS can cause bodily damage in other ways, particularly to neurological systems.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.