Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac W/newborn


celiacmama

Recommended Posts

celiacmama Newbie

Hi! I have celiac disease (diagnosed in June '04) and am also a new mom. My son is only 3 mo. old and our pediatrician told us that they typically cannot test children for celiac disease until they are 2 years old. I'm concerned that once he's on solids (which is well before 2 yrs) and he ingests gluten, that it may cause him problems. I'm interested to know if any of you have a young child with celiac disease. If so, when did you have him/her tested? What has your experience been with your child's docs? Should I find a pediatric gastro doc? I want to give my son as much protection from gluten (if he needs it) and teach him the right way to eat as early as possible. Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Usually testing below the age of 2 is inaccurate. When he starts with solid foods keep an eye and see if there are any noticeable reactions and when he is old enough get him tested.

lovegrov Collaborator

Your pediatrician is right. Celiac blood tests are not as accurate in children under 2, and before a certain age (which would be different in different children) would be completely useless.

Most experts these days would say that you should allow your child to eat gluten the same time any other child would eat it. In fact, some recent research (which I can't find the link to) suggests that children who either eat gluten real early or who are delayed past about 12 months, are actually more likely to develop celiac.

richard

Jnkmnky Collaborator

I thought the research said that introducing grains between 4 and 6 months could trigger gluten sensitivity? I can't keep up.

lbsteenwyk Explorer

Yes, a recent study suggests that the best time to introduce gluten to minimize the possibility of developing celiac disease is between 4-6 months of age. There is also evidence that breastfeeding well past the introduction of gluten can have a beneficial impact. If you are breastfeeding, I would suggest continuing for at least 1 year (which is recommended anyway by the American Academy of Pediatrics) to supplement your child as solids are introduced.

lovegrov Collaborator

Four to six months, that's the timeframe I was trying to think of. Anyway, there's seems to be little doubt that most researchers believe that keeping a child from gluten (unless you know they have celiac disease) is more likely to trigger celiac disease once they do eat it -- and eventually they will.

richard

aidansmom Rookie

My son had "typical" celiac disease symptoms. He had lots of tummy problems as an infant - reflux, gassy, rashes, etc - but he did grow on the growth curve. I breastfed and started solids at 6 months. Then he started slowing down on growth and completely stopped growing at 9 months. From 6 months until he was diagnosed at 14 months, he would have loose stools 6-7x/day. I was a first time mom and it took me several months to realize that this was not normal. I had to push him through the system. My dr. kept saying that he was normal. Even though he eventually dropped from 50% to 3% on the growth charts.

I also have a 3 month old and I'm breastfeeding and ingesting gluten. Our dr. suggested getting the genetic test in the meantime. We plan to give him gluten at 6 months and watch for the diarrhea and growth.

By the way, gluten DOES go through breastmilk. My son would have severe reactions if I ate a french fry that was contaminated from the oil.

Congrats on your little one!! I hope he stays Celiac free.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Merika Contributor

I was diagnosed with celiac when my ds was almost 2 yrs. At first, everything with my ds stayed the same. But I realized I could not (would not) prepare gluten foods for him and also have crumbs and sticky gluten fingers all over the house. In addition, he was having some allergy symptoms/possible slight celiac symptoms, so he went gluten-free.

If your child seems perfectly healthy, just introduce foods like you normally would (when he gets old enough) and watch. Personally, I would be tempted to only feed him gluten-free when he's with you and around the house until he's much older. Let the dad, and other friends and relatives feed him gluten foods when they go out. Little kids are MESSY, and they should be :) but there is no need to gluten yourself by accident just so they can eat gluten. It's not necessary for humans to eat gluten! :)

Merika

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Butch68's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    2. - MogwaiStripe replied to Midwestern's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      15

      Gluten Issues and Vitamin D

    3. - Butch68 posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    4. - trents replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      17

      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,217
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sutto
    Newest Member
    Sutto
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      This is a very common question, and the most important thing to know is that no, Guinness is not considered safe for individuals with coeliac disease. While it's fascinating to hear anecdotes from other coeliacs who can drink it without immediate issues, this is a risky exception rather than the rule. The core issue is that Guinness is brewed from barley, which contains gluten, and the standard brewing process does not remove the gluten protein to a level safe for coeliacs (below 20ppm). For someone like you who experiences dermatitis herpetiformis, the reaction is particularly significant. DH is triggered by gluten ingestion, even without immediate gastrointestinal symptoms. So, while you may not feel an instant stomach upset, drinking a gluten-containing beer like Guinness could very well provoke a flare-up of your skin condition days later. It would be a gamble with a potentially uncomfortable and long-lasting consequence. Fortunately, there are excellent, certified gluten-free stouts available now that can provide a safe and satisfying alternative without the risk.
    • MogwaiStripe
      Interestingly, this thought occurred to me last night. I did find that there are studies investigating whether vitamin D deficiency can actually trigger celiac disease.  Source: National Institutes of Health https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231074/ 
    • Butch68
      Before being diagnosed coeliac I used to love Guinness. Being made from barley it should be something a coeliac shouldn’t drink. But taking to another coeliac and they can drink it with no ill effects and have heard of others who can drink it too.  is this everyone’s experience?  Can I drink it?  I get dermatitis herpetiformis and don’t get instant reactions to gluten so can’t try it to see for myself. 
    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.