Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

U.s. Policies Around Gluten & Other Food Allergens


lucia

Recommended Posts

lucia Enthusiast

Hi everyone,

I'm in the advanced stages of my recovery from gluten intolerance/celiac, thanks to a combination of strict dietary regulation (including the Specific Carbohydrate diet) and Traditional Chinese Medicine (both acupuncture and herbs). I'm so grateful for my recovery. I was able to take a vacation last week to Rome and Florence to see the sights and to the U.K. to visit my godchild. A great trip, especially after such a difficult year.

I find myself wondering though: why have the governments of both Italy and the U.K. instituted policies that address people's medical issues with gluten, but my government has not.

In Italy, gluten-free foods are available in every pharmacy, right next to the diabetic foods. The government mandates this. In restaurants, when I described myself as a celiac or asked for gluten-free food, my servers were serious about accommodating my needs. Sometimes, I was turned away from a restaurant, but I was not served food with gluten. Given the seriousness with which my servers treated me, I wondered if the government also holds restaurants responsible for what they serve people? Of course, in a country with so much awareness of celiac, gluten-free goods were also readily available in supermarkets and restaurants with gluten-free menus were easy to find.

In the U.K., every packaged food product is labelled as to its allergens, including gluten (but also wheat, soy, milk, etc. and even celery). Even all prepared foods, such as soups and salads, are labelled. I can't comment on eating in restaurants, since on our short trip, I ate only prepackaged, prepared foods and home-cooked meals. But, also, on British Air, I was served a gluten-free dinner without any fuss.

Laws requiring 1) labels alerting consumers to food allergens, and 2) availability of gluten-free goods in pharmacies seem like solutions that are both simple and effective for people like us who struggle with a gluten-free diet. These measures also seem like they'd be no sweat off the backs of the politicians who get them passed. So, what's the hold-up in the U.S.? I know that the American medical community is hardly as responsive about diagnosing celiac/gluten intolerance as their peers in Europe, but still - isn't it so often consumer-led groups that get bills passed in the U.S.? Is there a lobbying group of celiacs out there that is working to get measures like these passed? Or is this the kind of thing that will be taken seriously only if it's led by doctors?

And, most importantly, what can I do to support such policies?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

Part of the reason is political - it *is* a big sweat off the politicians backs, because the agriculture business has a HUGE lobby with a LOT of money paying them to keep things easy. Not to mention the lawsuit fears that are rampant in this country. Write to your congress people and voice support of *reasonable* legislation (even if it's not the ideal of what you'd like). And vote with your pocketbook in places that make things as much like you would prefer as possible.

love2travel Mentor

I understand your frustration. In Canada we are even behind the U.S.! In preparation for a recent trip to Italy and Croatia I discovered that testing for celiac disease for every single person in Italy is mandatory by the age of 5. Amazing. It was interesting eating out in Italy; at a gelateria I was told I definitely could not have any of the gelato (Venice) but I could have the granita (delicious - I love granita). The employee even got the list of ingredients out to show me. Their knowledge was incredible. Rather than being met with blank stares, employees are so well versed in gluten-free. Croatia was not as easy but still easier than Canada (at least where I live where there are literally ZERO eateries I can eat at). Restaurant cards helped. Good to know that those of us with celiac disease are able to continue to safely eat in Europe!

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Part of the reason is political - it *is* a big sweat off the politicians backs, because the agriculture business has a HUGE lobby with a LOT of money paying them to keep things easy. Not to mention the lawsuit fears that are rampant in this country. Write to your congress people and voice support of *reasonable* legislation (even if it's not the ideal of what you'd like). And vote with your pocketbook in places that make things as much like you would prefer as possible.

In addition to this we also have Big Pharma who would rather sell us meds for symptoms. Over just the last 10 to 20 years or so a lot of the meds to control celiac related symptoms have gone to OTC so folks self medicate instead of insisting on a diagnosis of what is really wrong. We are actually taught from a young age that we should take a pill rather than finding out what the cause is. Many think feeling ill is 'normal for them'. That means lot of money lost when folks no longer need daily immodium, laxatives and meds for stomach pain, headaches, psychological and learning problems etc. In the US they give us pills to control symptoms rather than figuring out the cause.

ErinP Newbie

I think big pharma does indeed have a LOT to do with it, but--

Part of the reason is political - it *is* a big sweat off the politicians backs, because the agriculture business has a HUGE lobby with a LOT of money paying them to keep things easy.

I think this is the primary reason right here.

Despite the fact that grains are the most caloric-dense, and least nutritive of almost any food we consume, that they comprise the BASE of the US's food pyramid should be clue #1.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,076
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.