Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Biopsy, But Negative Genetics?!


mmm1017

Recommended Posts

mmm1017 Rookie

Oh, please, please help. I had an EGI done in September that showed the cracked river bed appearance, scalloping, and the biopsy turned up atrophy of the villi. My GI then ordered the Prometheus genetic tests, which just came back negative. She called to tell me that I definitely DO NOT have Celiac Disease, just IBS with gluten intolerance. I asked her about the atrophy to the villi. She said a virus can cause it? She said it was good news because I could have a slice of cake if I wanted to. I told her that I baked a cake for my husband and ended up extremely nauseous, even though I didn't eat any. I was even diligent about washing my hands and the kitchen surfaces. I am very confused. She went on to say that she and the rest of the medical community agree that the genetic test is conclusive because it is 99.9% accurate. At the end of our 15 minute phone conversation, she said it was possible I was in that .1%. I am really confused. Where on earth do I go from here?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Your celiac and your doctor is misinformed (as most are) about how many of us don't have one of those 2 genes. We have a lot to learn about the genetics of celiac but we do know that there are celiacs without one of those 2 associated genes. I am one of them.

Do stay strict with the diet as the result of 'cheating' is liable to make you very ill. It would also be a good idea to not use gluten flours in your home. If your family uses gluten baked goods get them premade and do keep your stuff safe if you have a mixed household.

The Horticulturalist Apprentice

Oh, please, please help. I had an EGI done in September that showed the cracked river bed appearance, scalloping, and the biopsy turned up atrophy of the villi. My GI then ordered the Prometheus genetic tests, which just came back negative. She called to tell me that I definitely DO NOT have Celiac Disease, just IBS with gluten intolerance. I asked her about the atrophy to the villi. She said a virus can cause it? She said it was good news because I could have a slice of cake if I wanted to. I told her that I baked a cake for my husband and ended up extremely nauseous, even though I didn't eat any. I was even diligent about washing my hands and the kitchen surfaces. I am very confused. She went on to say that she and the rest of the medical community agree that the genetic test is conclusive because it is 99.9% accurate. At the end of our 15 minute phone conversation, she said it was possible I was in that .1%. I am really confused. Where on earth do I go from here?

Did you have other celiac bloodwork done, and if yes what did it say? I would ask for a review of all your notes and biopsy slides from another gastroenterologist, preferably one more knowledgeable in the diagnosis of celiac disease, perhaps at one of the celiac centers.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Get a copy of the genetic test and look up the reported genes.

My test said negative if you read the short version - while still having a half celiac gene, plus 2 more that are suspect (meaning someone is researching them and associating them, they just aren't the most common in the west). Basically, I'm dq2 and 8 and 9 positive. Just not in full Celiac gene format.

Post the results here, we'll help!

mmm1017 Rookie

My endocrinologist ordered a saliva test to check for gliadin antibodies among other things. He was the one who found that I had hypothyroid issues after all the other doctors had just written me off as having fibromyalgia and attributing anything that came up as being a symptom of that. The SIgA test was positive with a value of 31 U/ml. Borderline: 13-15 U/ml Positive: >15. From Diagnos-Techs, Inc. "Patient shows moderate to severe intolerance or reactivity to Gliadin and is usually symptomatic with ongoing low to high-grade intestinal inflammation following Gliadin intake has been demonstrated."

My endocrinologist is of the alternative sort and told me to avoid gliadin containing grains forever. We discussed the hoops and possible timeline of a Celiac diagnosis, but I was so severely sick and desperate to feel better, I cut out grains. After a month, my baby was having issues with weight gain and I realized I needed a diagnosis for my childrens' sake.

I took a copy of this test to the GI on my first visit and it was dismissed as a test she'd never heard of. Fine, okay. She looked at my medical history and was pretty sure I had celiac disease. She asked me to gorge on bread for the next 2 weeks, then go in for the bloodwork and have the biopsy (same day).

These are the results of the bloodwork:

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody, IGA <3 Negative

Immunoglobulin A 127 In Range

Sed Rate by Modified

Westergreen 1

C-Reactive Protein <0.10

So, we have a positive gliadin antibody test, negative bloodwork, positive biopsy, and negative genetics. Any opinions would be GREATLY appreciated. I am VERY stressed. I was relieved when we had an answer to the symptoms that have plagued me since childhood. Now...

Roda Rising Star

I would consider yourself diagnosed. There are many that have negative blood work and positive biopsy. This is one of the main reasons that I won't have the genetic tests done. I am firmly diagnosed from blood work and biopsy and I don't need some jerk coming back and telling me I don't have celiac because I'm negative on the genes. There is no point on doing the genetic tests on my oldest son because he is not celiac according to all the testing we have done. He is gluten intolerent though. I may consider genetic testing on my youngest son (private testing only) since it may be helpful to get the "official" diagnosis for him. He had a positive IgA tTG and symptoms, so I put him gluten free without a scope/biopsy. Upon gluten reintroduction he was a mess. So I know he has celiac and the genetics "may" help us there.

mmm1017 Rookie

Get a copy of the genetic test and look up the reported genes.

My test said negative if you read the short version - while still having a half celiac gene, plus 2 more that are suspect (meaning someone is researching them and associating them, they just aren't the most common in the west). Basically, I'm dq2 and 8 and 9 positive. Just not in full Celiac gene format.

Post the results here, we'll help!

That would be an interesting thing to have. I have an appointment in 2 weeks, but I'm going to ask them to fax it to me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Takala Enthusiast

where on earth do I go from here ?

I would go to the health food store and grocery shop for gluten free ingredients, then to the Baking Forum farther down on the forum homepage, and start researching how to bake gluten free cakes.

They've done blood tests on me, and told me that I didn't have my arthritis, sjogren's, celiac/gluten intolerance, nerve damage, etc. It is truly amazing how downright awful they can be with running a blood test, and ignoring the physical, visual appearance of various body parts, at least before they get the x rays or detailed scans back.

Post the genetic tests when you get them, but basically, ignore the bad advice about being able to eat regular food, and don't eat what makes you feel sick.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bigwave
    Newest Member
    bigwave
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.