Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Waiting For Biopsy Results..

Jsny1010

Recommended Posts

Jsny1010 Rookie
Jsny1010
Posted

Hi everyone, first time posting here..

Ive been living with what my doctor has called IBS for about 5 years now, about 6 months ago he ran the blood tests and some came back positive.. not sure which ones but he refereed me to a specialist (GI) I think he thinks im just lactose intolerant but he suggested we do a biopsy to confirm or not the presence of celiac's, this is the question.. yesterday we did the biopsy, after the test he said everything looked OK but the biopsy results wont be in for a week or so, since it looks "OK" is that a good sign that it might not be Celiac's? should the doctor be able to see apparent damage with his scope? Just curious I hate waiting..

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

The damage they look on your biopsy is microscopic. They are looking for damage to the tiny, fingerlike projections on your intestinal lining, called villi. If the celiac is really severe the Dr. can see inflammation or visible changes to the shape of the intestines, called scalloping, but usually things looking OK to the naked eye doesn't mean much. Sorry.

As far as the blood tests, do you know what was positive? The biopsy can show false negative. Celiac damage can be patchy and inexperienced doctors do not take enough biopsy samples. You should still go off gluten if you had positive celiac blood tests - you might be rid of that pesky IBS for good!

I had "IBS" for years. Two weeks off gluten and it was better. Two months and it was completely gone. B)

Jsny1010 Rookie
Jsny1010
Posted
  • Author

I cant remember but i think it was the anti-gladlin or something like tgt-a or ATgt the doctor said it pretty fast, that was in the high 20's where it should have been below 11, and one other was elevated but my regular doctor gp didnt want to interpret the resulds so he sent me to the gi guy.. i guess i just have to wait for the results though he seems like he has been doing this for years, the doctors in his 70's i think lol

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

It is always a good idea to get copies of all your testing results. Sometimes doctors just glance at them and do not give you the correct information. Other times if something is just slightly abovve normal they will call it negative. If I were you I would get a copy of my blood results, and we would all love if you would post them here, with the ranges, so we got a chance to interpret them too :)

Jsny1010 Rookie
Jsny1010
Posted
  • Author

Will do, i'll see my GP tomorrow - i'll ask for a copy and see what it says and post it here, im glad there are web groups like this one weather it turns out im positive or not

Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

It doesn't mean a hill of beans that he said your intestines looked alright visibally with his eye. The pathologist has to look at it microscopically. I was told by my GI that my intestinal lining look mostly good with only slight inflammation. My biopsy was positive with villi blunting. Even with that and my positive blood work he "gave" me the option to go gluten free immediatly or recheck everything in three months. Huh? I went gluten free and I was diagnosed with celiac.

Even if your biopsy comes back negative, give the diet a try anyway. It sounds like you are celiac. Biopsies can have false negatives due to: inexperienced GI, inexperienced pathologist intepereting the samples, too few samples taken, patchy damage that is missed on biopsy, damage past the area the scope can reach.

Jsny1010 Rookie
Jsny1010
Posted
  • Author

Here are my blood test results..

Gliadin IgA Antibodies 7

Gliadin IgG Antibodies 28

Transglutaminase IgA 3.5

Transglutaminase IgG 4.4

Not sure about the endomysial its confusing but says

Endomysial IgA. Positive REFERENCE RANGE:

Negative. Endomysial AB (IgA titer) 1:10 titer. Reference Range: < 1:5

Not sure what that means. My regular doctor didn't have any info.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Jsny1010 Rookie
Jsny1010
Posted
  • Author

Oh and the ranges..

<11

<11

<4

<6

And titer 1:5

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Endomysial IgA. Positive REFERENCE RANGE:

Negative. Endomysial AB (IgA titer) 1:10 titer. Reference Range: < 1:5

Not sure what that means. My regular doctor didn't have any info.

It means you're celiac. You don't need to wait any more.

Endomysial IgA is an autoimmune antibody to your intestines that is very specific for celiac disease. You need to be on the gluten-free diet because even if your biopsy is negative now and your doctor doesn't diagnose celiac it's usually only a matter of time before the autoimmune damage gets bad enough to see on biopsy. The anti-gliadin IgG shows that the endomysial is not a mistake and you are reacting to gluten along with the autoimmunity.

When they test endomysial antibodies they dilute your blood. The more they can dilute it and still get a reaction, the more antibodies you have. A normal person's serum is not reactive at 1:5. Your serum was still reactive at 1:10, meaning you have at least twice the "normal" amount of endomysial antibodies.

Jsny1010 Rookie
Jsny1010
Posted
  • Author

It means you're celiac. You don't need to wait any more.

Thanks, I didnt realize that was the important part of the test, ive been mostly gluten free since December but im thinking i might as well go 100% off gluten and get rid of the issues I have with food!

Takala Enthusiast
Takala
Posted

Even if the Gastro doc's office calls you back and says that the biopsy was "negative," you should go on a true gluten free diet anyway.

Lactose intolerance is also a sign of celiac, you may heal up enough to be able to eat cheese and yogurt again.

Some doctors still use the so-called "gold standard" of insisting that both the blood tests AND the biopsy be positive for damage before bestowing the Official Celiac Diagnosis Seal of Approval

Jsny1010 Rookie
Jsny1010
Posted
  • Author

Thank you everyone,

Takala, yeah my GP told me "If the result comes back negative you dont have celiac" but I think some of the people on here have done more research and study on the bloodwork and celiac disease than he has.. i'll find out what they tell me on Monday, the doctor WONT tell me over the phone its been a nightmare this week, their "sedation" didnt work on me so i got the awesome experience of having a scope put down my throat, atleast I got some good food after it was over.

Today is my Day #1!

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Yay! Welcome to the gluten-free club. I hope you feel a lot better off gluten.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,949
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Stephanie94
    Newest Member
    Stephanie94
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jacki Espo
      Covid caused reoccurrence of DH without eating gluten

      By Jacki Espo · Posted

      This happened to me as well. What’s weirder is that within a couple hours of taking paxlovid it subsided. I thought maybe I got glutened but after reading your post not so sure. 
    • Mari
      New Celiac Mama in My 30s

      By Mari · Posted

      Hi Tiffany. Thank you for writing your dituation and  circumstancesin such detail and so well writte, too. I particularly noticed what you wrote about brain for and feeling like your brain is swelling and I know from my own experiences that's how it feel and your brain really does swell and you get migraines.    Way back when I was in my 20s I read a book by 2 MD allergist and they described their patient who came in complaining that her brain, inside her cranium, was swelling  and it happened when she smelled a certain chemical she used in her home. She kept coming back and insisting her brain actually swelled in her head. The Drs couldn't explain this problem so they, with her permission, performed an operation where they made a small opening through her cranium, exposed her to the chemical then watched as she brain did swell into the opening. The DRs were amazed but then were able to advise her to avoid chemicals that made her brain swell. I remember that because I occasionally had brain fog then but it was not a serious problem. I also realized that I was becoming more sensitive to chemicals I used in my work in medical laboratories. By my mid forties the brain fog and chemicals forced me to leave my  profession and move to a rural area with little pollution. I did not have migraines. I was told a little later that I had a more porous blood brain barrier than other people. Chemicals in the air would go up into my sinused and leak through the blood brain barrier into my brain. We have 2 arteries  in our neck that carry blood with the nutrients and oxygen into the brain. To remove the fluids and used blood from the brain there are only capillaries and no large veins to carry it away so all those fluids ooze out much more slowly than they came in and since the small capillaries can't take care of extra fluid it results in swelling in the face, especially around the eyes. My blood flow into my brain is different from most other people as I have an arterial ischema, adefectiveartery on one side.   I have to go forward about 20 or more years when I learned that I had glaucoma, an eye problem that causes blindness and more years until I learned I had celiac disease.  The eye Dr described my glaucoma as a very slow loss of vision that I wouldn't  notice until had noticeable loss of sight.  I could have my eye pressure checked regularly or it would be best to have the cataracts removed from both eyes. I kept putting off the surgery then just overnight lost most of the vision in my left eye. I thought at the I had been exposed to some chemical and found out a little later the person who livedbehind me was using some chemicals to build kayaks in a shed behind my house. I did not realize the signifance  of this until I started having appointments with a Dr. in a new building. New buildings give me brain fog, loss of balance and other problems I know about this time I experienced visual disturbances very similar to those experienced by people with migraines. I looked further online and read that people with glaucoma can suffer rapid loss of sight if they have silent migraines (no headache). The remedy for migraines is to identify and avoid the triggers. I already know most of my triggers - aromatic chemicals, some cleaning materials, gasoline and exhaust and mold toxins. I am very careful about using cleaning agents using mostly borax and baking powder. Anything that has any fragrance or smell I avoid. There is one brand of dishwashing detergent that I can use and several brands of  scouring powder. I hope you find some of this helpful and useful. I have not seen any evidence that Celiac Disease is involved with migraines or glaucoma. Please come back if you have questions or if what I wrote doesn't make senseto you. We sometimes haveto learn by experience and finding out why we have some problems. Take care.       The report did not mention migraines. 
    • Mari
      My only proof

      By Mari · Posted

      Hi Jmartes71 That is so much like my story! You probably know where Laytonville is and that's where I was living just before my 60th birthday when the new Dr. suggested I could have Celiacs. I didn't go on a gluten challange diet before having the Celiac panel blood test drawn. The results came back as equivical as one antibody level was very high but another, tissue transaminasewas normal. Itdid show I was  allergic to cows milk and I think hot peppers. I immediately went gluten free but did not go in for an endoscopy. I found an online lab online that would do the test to show if I had a main celiac gene (enterolab.com). The report came back that I had inherited a main celiac gene, DQ8, from one parent and a D!6 from the other parent. That combination is knows to sym[tons of celiac worse than just inheriting one main celiac gene. With my version of celiac disease I was mostly constipated but after going gluten-free I would have diarrhea the few times I was glutened either by cross contamination or eating some food containing gluten. I have stayed gluten-free for almost 20 years now and knew within a few days that it was right for me although my recovery has been slow.   When I go to see a  medical provide and tell them I have celiacs they don't believe me. The same when I tell them that I carry a main celiac gene, the DQ8. It is only when I tell them that I get diarrhea after eating gluten that they realize that I might have celiac disease. Then they will order th Vitamin B12 and D3 that I need to monitor as my B12 levels can go down very fast if I'm not taking enough of it. Medical providers haven't been much help in my recovery. They are not well trained in this problem. I really hope this helps ypu. Take care.      
    • knitty kitty
      Does anyone here also have Afib

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Fascinating.
    • DebJ14
      Does anyone here also have Afib

      By DebJ14 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.