Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Going Crazy-Need Help Please


varthurs

Recommended Posts

varthurs Apprentice

I have been suffering terribly with stomach issues. I specifically asked my doctor to test me for Celiac. Last week I got the call from my Doctor that my blood test came back positive for Celiac Disease. Since I am PETRIFIED of having this biopsy, he told me I can just start eating gluten free. Even suggested I see a Nutritionist. I think it would be beneficial for me to have the biopsy, just to be 100% sure. Does anyone have an opinion about this? How accurate are the blood tests?

Also, when I decided I'd make an appt for gastro doctor, I called back to see if I should start eating gluten free. He told me I should. But now I am confused from my research. Can I eat gluten free before the biopsy? Not sure if it's the blood test that will get incorrect results from gluten free eating, or the biopsy.

Sorry, I am very overwhelmed and confused. Waiting until March 5th for appointment with gastro doctor is like an eternity. I am going CRAZY. And I want to feel better. NOW.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ciamarie Rookie

Is your gastro appointment for the actual biopsy, or just an initial appointment to see if a biopsy is needed which would be scheduled another time? I'm not positive, but 1 week on a gluten-free diet may not make a great deal of difference on the biopsy results, but generally you should continue to eat gluten until all testing is complete.

According to what I just saw on this other thread: it's possible to get a false negative on the blood test, but if it's positive then it's positive. If the dr. will diagnose you based on the blood test without the biopsy, that might be the way to go. In the end it's your decision, though.

Jai Rookie

depends how long you have to wait for the biopsy. However, a false negative biopsy is more common than a false positive blood test. Depends on the severity of villi damage....you can have symptoms even before the villi are severely damaged...

mushroom Proficient

Welcome to the board, varthurs. Some tests for celiac are more definitive than others. Do you know what blood tests your doctor ran and which were positive? The only test which could potentially falsely indicate celiac disease is the tTG, in which a positive result can possibly indicate other conditions besides celiac. But if you have a positive tTG and your symptoms disappear with a gluten free diet, well then I think you have your answer.

It is entirely your choice whether or not you have the biopsy, but if you do decide to have it you should continue eating gluten up until the time of the test to attempt to avoid a false negative. As a pp said, there is a 20% error rate which produces false negatives, either because the damage is not yet severe enough or not sufficiently widespread and is missed, or the doctor did not take enough samples, or the pathologist did not read it correctly.

If I were you and your doctor is willing to diagnose based on the blood test results, I think I would skip the biopsy for now (although there is really nothing much to be afraid of with this procedure - it is pretty routine and is done under sedation, not anesthesia). If your symptoms do not resolve on the diet it is a procedure that can always be done at a later stage, as other conditions which might be looked for through the scope do not require you to be eating gluten.

GottaSki Mentor

I agree with Mushroom. A positive tTG IgA is not possible without your immune system reacting to Gluten - while a negative result does not rule out Celiac Disease.

Going gluten-free seems like the best next step if you are certain you don't want an endo. I've gone back in forth about the need for my initial endoscope. Over the past few years I thought maybe it would have been enough to go gluten-free after the positive blood work. I now am grateful that I went ahead with the initial scope and a follow up a year later as the first test confirmed the celiac dx (so never gave a second thought to the need to be 100% gluten-free). The subsequent scope was helpful in putting the rest of my puzzle together as the damage to my digestive track became worse after 13 months of complete adherence to a gluten-free diet -- eventually I found that I was intolerant of many foods.

I likely would have figured this out without the scopes, but it was part of solving the puzzle for me.

Welcome and Good Luck to you!

PS...you do need to be eating gluten up until the endoscopy is complete should you decide to have one.

varthurs Apprentice

Thank you, all. I am not sure which exact blood tests were taken. I will try to get copies tomorrow.

49erlady Newbie

I just had the endo done 2 weeks ago. It was a breeze! My test came back positive for Celiac disease. Good luck!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,744
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    jude T
    Newest Member
    jude T
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.