Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Help On My Blood Test Results


BrewlessInTheBay

Recommended Posts

BrewlessInTheBay Newbie

Hi all,

I got blood results recently and it seems like I had one positive test and one negative test. Does anyone know how likely I am to have Celiac based on this info? My doctor wasn't helpful in assessing this. I am getting an Endo next week which I assume will confirm whether I have it?

Here are the test results:

Component Your result Standard range Units

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE IgG 1.13 < 0.90 - Index

Tissue transglutaminase IgA 0.32 < 0.90 - Index


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Hello, and welcome.

They performed the two versions of the tTG test, the IgA and the IgG versions. IgA and IgG are two types of autoimmune antibodies that your body makes when it is unhappy with gluten. Oftentimes they only run the IgA version and run a test called total serum IgA (as a control) to make sure your body produces 'normal' amounts of IgA (everybody produces some). If the total IgA is insufficient overall they run the IgG version of the tTG test. In your case your doctor just automatically asked for both versions. The fact that your IgG was positive and IgA negative probably means you do not produce normal IgA amounts. Either way, a positive test is a positive test and I believe you can consider that you have celiac disease. Hopefully you will get a definitive answer with the biopsy. Make sure that they take at least six samples because the damage is not uniform throughout the small intestine. And there can still be a false negative on the biopsy. So you should give the gluten free diet a strict three-month trial regardless of whether the biopsy is positive or negative.

BrewlessInTheBay Newbie

Wow that is such awesome info. Way better than my doctor's explanation! Just a quick follow up, do most Celliacs see postiive tests on both IgA and IgG, or is it possible to get a positive IgG and a negative IgA and stll be a Celiac?

Also with regard to to six samples, I just mention to my doctor before the test?

Thanks so much!

Hello, and welcome.

They performed the two versions of the tTG test, the IgA and the IgG versions. IgA and IgG are two types of autoimmune antibodies that your body makes when it is unhappy with gluten. Oftentimes they only run the IgA version and run a test called total serum IgA (as a control) to make sure your body produces 'normal' amounts of IgA (everybody produces some). If the total IgA is insufficient overall they run the IgG version of the tTG test. In your case your doctor just automatically asked for both versions. The fact that your IgG was positive and IgA negative probably means you do not produce normal IgA amounts. Either way, a positive test is a positive test and I believe you can consider that you have celiac disease. Hopefully you will get a definitive answer with the biopsy. Make sure that they take at least six samples because the damage is not uniform throughout the small intestine. And there can still be a false negative on the biopsy. So you should give the gluten free diet a strict three-month trial regardless of whether the biopsy is positive or negative.

mushroom Proficient

Yes, it is perfectly possible for one to be positive and the other negative. There are a whole series of tests (the 'panel') that have been developed for celiac disease, and you need only be positive on one of them.

And you don't just 'mention' to the doctor, you "insist" :D (in a nice way, of course).

jnh380 Rookie

Hi Brewless, I see you have just gotten results from Kaiser, as I just got similar results from then a few weeks ago. The .90 reference range is the giveaway (that and you live in the bay).

The previous posters are correct in that the IGG steps in when you are IGA deficient. For me the numbers were reversed, IGA was 1.56 and IGG was .35. I just had a biopsy endoscopy this monday and am waiting on the results. Have you scheduled one? I dont remember anything about it so its nothing to fear.

I wish Kaiser was a bit more interactive, so far I have only gotten small amounts of information from them. I will let you know what happens with the biopsy results. Welcome to the suspected but not proven Celiac club!

BrewlessInTheBay Newbie

Hi Brewless, I see you have just gotten results from Kaiser, as I just got similar results from then a few weeks ago. The .90 reference range is the giveaway (that and you live in the bay).

The previous posters are correct in that the IGG steps in when you are IGA deficient. For me the numbers were reversed, IGA was 1.56 and IGG was .35. I just had a biopsy endoscopy this monday and am waiting on the results. Have you scheduled one? I dont remember anything about it so its nothing to fear.

I wish Kaiser was a bit more interactive, so far I have only gotten small amounts of information from them. I will let you know what happens with the biopsy results. Welcome to the suspected but not proven Celiac club!

Hey,

TOTALLY AGREE. I can't get an answer from anyone! From I what understand a positive IGA is more likely to be Celiac than an IGG. I had the biopsy as well and am waiting for results! I will let you know!

beachbirdie Contributor

Hey,

TOTALLY AGREE. I can't get an answer from anyone! From I what understand a positive IGA is more likely to be Celiac than an IGG. I had the biopsy as well and am waiting for results! I will let you know!

I'm very interested to hear your biopsy results! Like you, I tested positive in the ttg igg, and negative on everything else. It's not common to test this way, I've heard!

Haven't figured out what to do yet. I just sent my result to my doctor (I didn't go through her for testing) and am waiting to hear what she says.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ziva Newbie

On Friday, I went with my 21 y/o daughter to her 3 week after endoscopy follow up appt. The doctor totally changed his diagnosis from "classic Celiac" after our initial appt and endoscoy findings to No to Celiac because "the Golden Standard" of biopsy was not met. He now says the ttg IgG result that was 9.3 was not really high. (<6 neg, 6-9 - weak positive and >9 positive) Only test she showed high. Looking back, I don't see where they did the IgA quantity. Can I say we are VERY frustrated! He didn't seem to take into account that she seems to feel better 3 weeks gluten free. No ear infections, decreased bowel problems, more regular bm without added fiber to name a few things. Also had no explaination for her anemia. He is now going with IBS and wants her to take lubiprostone / amitiza and do a stool test for blood. Also said she should "modify" her carbs but doesn't have to eliminate them. It looks like that medication could have some unpleasant side effects! Anyone else take that medication?

Any input?

I'm thinking she is going to skip the medication for now and continue eating gluten free. Right? Do the poop test for blood. Is 2 months eating gluten free long enough to see changes in blood work for anemia?

So frustrating! Good luck to the other posters on this thread regarding your results. Seems like you really have to go with how you react to foods because you may not get confirmation from the doctors.

mushroom Proficient

On Friday, I went with my 21 y/o daughter to her 3 week after endoscopy follow up appt. The doctor totally changed his diagnosis from "classic Celiac" after our initial appt and endoscoy findings to No to Celiac because "the Golden Standard" of biopsy was not met. He now says the ttg IgG result that was 9.3 was not really high. (<6 neg, 6-9 - weak positive and >9 positive) Only test she showed high. Looking back, I don't see where they did the IgA quantity. Can I say we are VERY frustrated! He didn't seem to take into account that she seems to feel better 3 weeks gluten free. No ear infections, decreased bowel problems, more regular bm without added fiber to name a few things. Also had no explaination for her anemia. He is now going with IBS and wants her to take lubiprostone / amitiza and do a stool test for blood. Also said she should "modify" her carbs but doesn't have to eliminate them. It looks like that medication could have some unpleasant side effects! Anyone else take that medication?

Any input?

I'm thinking she is going to skip the medication for now and continue eating gluten free. Right? Do the poop test for blood. Is 2 months eating gluten free long enough to see changes in blood work for anemia?

So frustrating! Good luck to the other posters on this thread regarding your results. Seems like you really have to go with how you react to foods because you may not get confirmation from the doctors.

You got that one right, Ziva. That is really the final test - does it make her feel better? If it does, then you have your answer - she should not eat gluten. Doesn't matter what the tests say. You tried your best to extract a diagnosis, he chooses to ignore the positive blood result and go with the biopsy which depends on the skill of the GI and the pathologist, and put her on medication!! I am not familiar with those meds but I assume neither one of them is addressing her iron deficiency? It is going to take her quite a while to heal enough to start absorbing iron if it is due to celiac, unfortunately.

I share your frustration. Do do the stool blood test, if only to show him, and do keep her gluten free, steady as she goes :)

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

A little positive? So...she's supposed to go her merry way and come back when the damage is more? :o

I hope she stays gluten-free. As she heals her iron levels will come up.

Dr.s make me crazy! When they know a test isn't 100% accurate, and continuing to eat gluten when your body is intolerant of it, can cause more damage, they don't err on the side of caution..they say go ahead and eat it? :blink:

I guess that keeps them in business with a steady stream of sick patients?

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

Just wanted to add that my son (7) was negative on all the IgA tests (but not total IgA - that was sufficient) but positive on the IgG tests. His biopsy was positive.

I had positive blood tests and negative biopsy. My doctor diagnosed me with "gluten intolerance" instead of celiac because of the negative biopsy. My son's doctor (who seems more knowledgeable) said that was silly. I just didn't have any damage yet . . . no reason to continue eating gluten just to create damage that can be measured. A positive blood test is enough to tell you to stop eating gluten.

Been gluten-free for a year now and feel great . . .

Cara

nora-n Rookie

I just want to comment that the ttg test is specifically developed to look for total villous atrophy, or lots of tissue damage, so a weak positive does mean there is a lot of tissue damage. Biopsies can miss the celia lesions.

Celiac nowadays is typically the patchy kind, so a negative biopsy does not say much. They just missed the spots.

There was a study recently about biospy practices in the U.S, and the places where they follow guidelines and take more biopsy samples, have double the number of celiac diagnosis compared to those places where they only take one or two samples.

jnh380 Rookie

Hey,

TOTALLY AGREE. I can't get an answer from anyone! From I what understand a positive IGA is more likely to be Celiac than an IGG. I had the biopsy as well and am waiting for results! I will let you know!

Brewless- I got my biopsy results and they came back positive. Looks like I definately have celiac. Hope you get the answer you are looking for.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Mark Conway's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Have I got coeliac disease

    2. - trents replied to Mark Conway's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Have I got coeliac disease

    3. - JudyLou replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    4. - knitty kitty replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Mark Conway's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Have I got coeliac disease

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,152
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    SinnamonToasty
    Newest Member
    SinnamonToasty
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      And I agree with Wheatwacked. When a physician tells you that you can't have celiac disease because you're not losing weight, you can be certain that doctor is operating on a dated understanding of celiac disease. I assume you are in the UK by the way you spelled "coeliac". So, I'm not sure what your options are when it comes to healthcare, but I might suggest you look for another physician who is more up to date in this area and is willing to work with you to get an accurate diagnosis. If, in fact, you do not have celiac disease but you know that gluten causes you problems, you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). There is no test available yet for NCGS. Celiac must first be ruled out. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the lining of the small bowel. NCGS we is not autoimmune and we know less about it's true nature. But we do know it is considerably more common than celiac disease.
    • trents
      @Mark Conway, here is an article outlining the various tests that can be used to diagnose celiac disease. By far, the most popular one ordered by physicians is the tTG-IGA. But almost all of these tests are known by different names so the terminology will vary from place to place and lab to lab. The article gives common variant names for each test.  In addition to IGA tests there are IGG tests which are particularly useful in the case of IGA deficiency.  
    • JudyLou
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty! My feet aren’t dry or ashy and I don’t have a rash that gets scaly. It’s like very itchy/burning vesicles that are symmetrical - on both arms, both legs, etc. They actually feel better in direct sunlight as long as it isn’t really hot or I’m not exercising outside, but gets worse if I sweat (especially if the area is covered up). It’s not usually on the outside of my elbows and knees which seems more typical of dermatitis herpetiformis (unless it spreads there). It tends to first hit the inside of those areas. Interestingly, twice the rash broke out soon after eating an unhealthy meal and having an alcoholic drink (I only drink a few times a year, no more alcohol content than a glass of wine).  So I wonder if there is a connection. I’m halfway considering doing a gluten challenge for a few months to see what happens, knowing I can stop if I have any symptoms, and asking for a full celiac disease panel at the end. I really appreciate your thoughts! 
    • knitty kitty
      Welcome, @JudyLou, Your rash sounds very similar to the one I experienced.  Mine was due to a deficiency in Niacin B3, although I had deficiencies in other nutrients as well.  Celiac disease causes malabsorption of all the essential nutrients, but eating a poor diet, taking certain medications, or drinking alcohol can result in deficiency diseases outside of Celiac, too.  Symptoms can wax and wane depending on dietary intake.  I knew an alcoholic who had the "boots" of Pellagra, which would get worse when he was drinking more heavily, and improve when he was drinking less.   Niacin deficiency is called Pellagra.  Symptoms consist of dermatitis, diarrhea, dementia, and death (the four D's).  A scaly rash on the feet and hands and arms are called the "boots" and "gloves" of Pellagra.  Darkened skin around the neck exposed to the sun is Casal's necklace.  Poor farmers with niacin deficient diets were called "red necks" because of this.    Does your rash get worse if you're in the sun?  Mine did.  Any skin exposed to the sun got blistered and scaly.  Arms, legs, neck, head.  Do you have dry, ashy skin on your feet?  The itchiness was not only from the rash, but neuropathy.   My doctors were clueless.  They didn't put all my symptoms together into the three D's.  But I did.  I'd learned about Pellagra at university.  But there weren't supposed to be deficiency diseases anymore in the developed world.  Doubtful it could be that simple, I started supplementing with Niacin and other essential nutrients.  I got better.   One of Niacinamide functions is to help stop mast cells from releasing histamine.  Your allergist gave you doxepin, an antihistamine which stops mast cells from releasing histamine.   Since you do have a Celiac gene, staying on the gluten free diet can prevent Celiac disease from being triggered again.   Interesting Reading: These case studies have pictures... Pellgra revisited.  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4228662/ Steroid-Resistant Rash With Neuropsychiatric Deterioration and Weight Loss: A Modern-Day Case of Pellagra https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12532421/#:~:text=Figure 2.,(right panel) upper limbs.&text=The distribution of the rash,patient's substantial response to treatment.   Cutaneous signs of nutritional disorders https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8721081/#:~:text=Additional causes of yellow skin,the clinical features of Kwashiorkor.   Hello, @Staticgypsy, I would not recommend cutting so many nutritious foods out of ones diet.  Oxalates can cause problems like kidney stones, but our bodies can process oxalates out of our systems with certain vitamins like Vitamins A and D and Pyridoxine B 6.   People with Celiac disease are often low in fat soluble vitamins A and D, as well as the water soluble B vitamins like Pyridoxine B 6.  Focus on serving your granddaughter nutrient dense meals to ensure she gets essential vitamins and minerals that will help her grow. Micronutrient inadequacy and urinary stone disease: an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36976348/ Multivitamins co-intake can reduce the prevalence of kidney stones: a large-scale cross-sectional study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38564076/
    • Wheatwacked
      This doctor is obviously under educated about Celiac Disease. Deficiencies that can cause oral thrush (Candidiasis) mouth ulcers: Thiamine B1 B12 Folate Zinc Vitamin C B2 B6 Iron Malabsorption Syndrome is often co-morbid with Celiac Disease causing multiple deficiencies of the essential vitamins and minerals.  Low or deficient  Vitamin D is almost always found in undiagnosed Celiac Disease. "Over 900 genes have been reported as regulated by vitamin D"  Possible Role of Vitamin D in Celiac Disease Onset  "The overall prevalence rate of vitamin D deficiency was 41.6%, with the highest rate seen in blacks (82.1%), followed by Hispanics (69.2%)."    Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.