Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I Have An Endoscopy?


mamato4

Recommended Posts

mamato4 Rookie

Hi All,

I am new here, so I am just starting out on learning about Celiac. I was given a positive blood test result over the phone from my Dr yesterday. I am waiting on a referral to a gastroenterologist. Here's my question: Can you help me think through the pros and cons of going through with the biopsy? Part of me thinks that a lifetime of symptoms that fit the dx is good enough. I temporarily took myself off gluten recently and felt AMAZING for the first time EVER (I'm 32). I went back on it and had shockingly severe symptoms within an hour and for almost a week. I'm off again and am starting to feel normal. The other part of me thinks that I should find out the extent of my intestinal damage (and IF I have any), so that I'm not tempted to cheat when the gluten-free diet gets hard to stick to.

Any advice? I'm torn. I don't want to go back on gluten for the test, but I really do want to know. I should add: I have 4 kids who I'd like to have tested. Blood work will be happening soon. My 8yo has had chronic diarrhea since birth and has an ADHD diagnosis, though I've always suspected food as a correlation.

TIA for you help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



beachbirdie Contributor

Hi All,

I am new here, so I am just starting out on learning about Celiac. I was given a positive blood test result over the phone from my Dr yesterday. I am waiting on a referral to a gastroenterologist. Here's my question: Can you help me think through the pros and cons of going through with the biopsy? Part of me thinks that a lifetime of symptoms that fit the dx is good enough. I temporarily took myself off gluten recently and felt AMAZING for the first time EVER (I'm 32). I went back on it and had shockingly severe symptoms within an hour and for almost a week. I'm off again and am starting to feel normal. The other part of me thinks that I should find out the extent of my intestinal damage (and IF I have any), so that I'm not tempted to cheat when the gluten-free diet gets hard to stick to.

Any advice? I'm torn. I don't want to go back on gluten for the test, but I really do want to know. I should add: I have 4 kids who I'd like to have tested. Blood work will be happening soon. My 8yo has had chronic diarrhea since birth and has an ADHD diagnosis, though I've always suspected food as a correlation.

TIA for you help.

HI and welcome to the forum.

You are going to receive answers from all over the spectrum on the question of scoping vs. not scoping. You'll have to be the final judge.

If you really need a firmer diagnosis to make you stay on the diet, maybe scoping is worth it. If you need a diagnosis for some kinds of tax advantages or for disability services, it might be worth it.

On the other hand, sometimes celiac damage is missed in the biopsy and then docs will say you don't have celiac even if you do. Damage can be patchy, and a lot depends on the skill of the person taking the biopsy, as well as the pathologist who reads/interprets the slides.

If you are off gluten for any length of time, you are going to skew the results. Your intestines will start healing and you WILL get a negative biopsy. You must be glutening for the scope to give accurate results.

I think the dramatic response to dietary change is a huge factor, and you could consider that answer enough.

Do you happen to have a copy of your test results? Do you know which blood tests they did?

veronika Newbie

If your doctor will diagnose you with Celiac's based on the positive bloodwork then there is no huge reason to get the scope done IMO. The only reason you would do it at that point is if you want to see the extent of the damage, or to be super positive that the diagnosis is correct (although I hear the rate of false positive is really really low).

If your doctor will not diagnose you just based on the blood work (which would be strange, but does happen), or if they are worried about the extent of damage, I would have the scope -- no question. There is a tax credit for the cost of gluten-free products in Canada too, which is nice, but you will need a diagnosis in order to claim it. Hopefully if you decide you have the scope done it doesn't take too long to get you in, so you don't have to be on gluten for months. The scope is covered under provincial health care, in most cases, so there is no worry about the cost and the actual procedure is pretty easy to deal with.

veronika Newbie

So I re-read my post and I sound retarded... thought you were Canadian, sorry about that. I'm going to blame the brain fog on this one :blink: .

mamato4 Rookie

Thank you for responding! I requested all my lab work to be mailed...I got copies in the mail today of all the tests she ran EXCEPT the Celiac panel. Arg. Anyway, I asked her twice to tell me what it said. All I know is that there were 6 antibodies tested and the only one that was positive read tTg- iGg. She said it was an 8 and was on the high end of weakly positive. Does that help? As soon as I actually get the correct printout I'll post it.

beachbirdie Contributor

Thank you for responding! I requested all my lab work to be mailed...I got copies in the mail today of all the tests she ran EXCEPT the Celiac panel. Arg. Anyway, I asked her twice to tell me what it said. All I know is that there were 6 antibodies tested and the only one that was positive read tTg- iGg. She said it was an 8 and was on the high end of weakly positive. Does that help? As soon as I actually get the correct printout I'll post it.

I see now why the scope might be recommended. The TtG IgG can be elevated from some things besides celiac, and the scope should show damage to the intestine. Some docs won't diagnose if that is the only elevated antibody. That said, there are several here who only had positive TtG IgG, and yet their scope showed a LOT of damage.

That antibody is a definite sign that you have autoimmunity going on, it is an antibody in which the body is attacking itself.

mamato4 Rookie

Thank you. Here are my full results. Vit D and TSH were normal.

WBC 3.9 Range 4.0-10.5

Deamidated Gliadin , IgA 2 Range 0-19

Deamidated Gliadin IgG 3 Range 0-19

Endomysial Antibody IgA Negative

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 118 Range 70-400

tTG, IgA <2 Range 0-3

tTG, IgG 8 Range 0-5


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,019
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Wilson1984
    Newest Member
    Wilson1984
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
    • knitty kitty
      Please do more research before you settle on nicotine. Dr. Paul New house is a psychiatrist.  His latest study involves the effect of nicotine patches on Late Life Depression which has reached no long term conclusions about the benefits.   Effects of open-label transdermal nicotine antidepressant augmentation on affective symptoms and executive function in late-life depression https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39009312/   I'm approaching the subject from the Microbiologist's point of view which shows nicotine blocks Thiamine B1 uptake and usage:   Chronic Nicotine Exposure In Vivo and In Vitro Inhibits Vitamin B1 (Thiamin) Uptake by Pancreatic Acinar Cells https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26633299/   While supplementation with thiamine in the form Benfotiamine can protect from damage done by  nicotine: Benfotiamine attenuates nicotine and uric acid-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction in the rat https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18951979/   I suggest you study the beneficial effects of Thiamine (Benfotiamine and TTFD) on the body and mental health done by Dr. Derrick Lonsdale and Dr. Chandler Marrs.  Dr. Lonsdale had studied thiamine over fifty years.   Hiding in Plain Sight: Modern Thiamine Deficiency https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533683/ I suggest you read their book Thiamine Deficiency Disease, Dysautonomia, and High Calorie Malnutrition.     Celiac Disease is a disease of malabsorption causing malnutrition.  Thiamine and benfotiamine: Focus on their therapeutic potential https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682628/
    • sleuth
      Thanks for your response.  Everything you mentioned he is and has been doing.  Tobacco is not the same as nicotine.  Nicotine, in the form of a patch, does not cause gastrointestinal irritation.  Smoking does. He is not smoking.  Please do your research before stating false information. Dr. Paul Newhouse has been doing research on nicotine the last 40 years at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.  
    • Jmartes71
      Im so frustrated and still getting the run around trying to reprove my celiac disease which my past primary ignored for 25 years.I understand that theres a ray of medical that doctors are limited too but not listening and telling the patient ( me) that im not as sensitive as I think and NOT celiac!Correction Mr white coat its not what I think but for cause and affect and past test that are not sticking in my medical records.I get sick violently with foods consumed, not eating the foods will show Im fabulous. After many blood draws and going through doctors I have the HLA- DQ2 positive which I read in a study that Iran conducted that the severity in celiac is in that gene.Im glutenfree and dealing with related issues which core issue of celiac isn't addressed. My skin, right eye, left leg diagestive issues affected. I have high blood pressure because im in pain.Im waisting my time on trying to reprove that Im celiac which is not a disease I want, but unfortunately have.It  has taken over my life personally and professionally. How do I stop getting medically gaslight and get the help needed to bounce back if I ever do bounce back to normal? I thought I was in good care with " celiac specialist " but in her eyes Im good.Im NOT.Sibo positive, IBS, Chronic Fatigue just to name a few and its all related to what I like to call a ghost disease ( celiac) since doctors don't seem to take it seriously. 
    • trents
      @Martha Mitchell, your reaction to the lens implant with gluten sounds like it could be an allergic reaction rather than a celiac reaction. It is possible for a celiac to be also allergic to gluten as it is a protein component in wheat, barley and rye.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.