Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Explanation Of Biopsy?


Sarahsmile416

Recommended Posts

Sarahsmile416 Apprentice

Finally back from a long extended vacation...back to reality. To give a short history, had a biopsy done back on Dec 19- got results back on Dec 21st. Nurse (not doctor) phoned and told me I did not have any evidence of celiac but to start taking aciphex for the acid reflux (never mind that that was not my presenting problem). I called them after Xmas and explained that while I would take the aciphex for the reflux, that was not what I presented with. She told me that the acid reflux caused the inflammation in my intestines and duodenum and by taking the aciphex everything would disappear. Meanwhile, I told her I was going to go on a gluten free diet to see if my symptoms improved which she failed to understand. I had to arm wrestle them to give me another appointment - so to me it's clear they were just going to take one symptom and use it to explain another and just conveniently forget the others (2 other autoimmune diseases, loss of enamel on my teeth dating back years, keratosis pilaris, etc etc).

Anyway, I read the doctor's explanation of the biopsy...and I say explanation very lightly because for 8 samples there is almost nothing in the way of explanation.

Here is what it says: gastritis was noted. Inflammation of the stomach noted. It was mild. Biopsies for H, pylori bacterial infection were negative.

Esophagitis was found. The severity was mild. Inflammation due to the presence of acid reflux has caused inflammation on the lining of your esophagus. There is no evidence of pre-malignant changes.

Other comments: inflammation of the duodenum was seen but no evidence of celiac disease. The inflammation could be secondary to acid secretion.

Any ideas, comments, pearls of wisdom regarding the "explanation"?Should I keep my appointment with the doctor or just leave well enough alone?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Takala Enthusiast

Make the doctor give you some sort of "explanation" as to what IS causing the acid reflux which is causing the damage.

Then you have 2 choices. You can either go on one of these wild-goose chases, take the meds, and go on one of these heartburn diets where you eliminate all these different acidic, spicy, fatty, dairy, and fried foods that supposedly cause acid reflux, (and likely won't work, because you are supposed to eat grains on this), or you can go on a gluten free diet and see what happens, which has just as good a chance of working, because you have certain symptoms of celiac and associated conditions that go along with it. And celiac and gluten intolerance can cause ferocious heartburn and acid reflux. Before I went gluten free, my diet got more and more restrictive, and I was told to take various otc heartburn meds, like tums, (not a good idea) but I was eliminating the wrong types of proteins, eating more grains because it was supposed to be "healthier," :ph34r: and the various acid blockers didn't do anything except give me some strange side effects, so I had to stop them. Now, other than avoiding gluten, I eat a lot of the foods that were supposedly giving me heartburn back in the 1980's, and have no reaction to them and don't have heartburn. It was very strange to discover that I could, if I wanted to, eat something like a gluten free pancake or gluten free french toast, with some coffee, and an orange, and have no reaction to it - I was using just almond meal to make things in the beginning.

kareng Grand Master

That sounds like the doctors procedure report? Get a copy of the pathology report. See if the pathologist saw any evidence of Celiac.

Sarahsmile416 Apprentice

Is that easy to get a hold of? Also, does that often happen that the pathologist sees celiac but the doctor does not/and/or reports something else?

kareng Grand Master

Is that easy to get a hold of? Also, does that often happen that the pathologist sees celiac but the doctor does not/and/or reports something else?

Ask the doctor for a copy of it. It will tell you if he even did a biopsy. My GI claimed he biopsied something but there was no path report for it so I know he didn't. When I worked in health care, there are plenty of surgeons that do not list what was found on the path report. Partially because an operation/ procedure report is done before the pathology comes back.

Sarahsmile416 Apprentice

Wow! That's pretty shameful! My GI claimed she got 8 samples...but really with the quick turn around on the report and the tidy little "explanation"-- and based on what you are saying, no I'm doubting a biopsy was actually done.

So are you saying that the pathologist report will confirm whether or not a biopsy was actually done? Does that mean if there was one done there will be a report and if there wasn't, there won't be?

mushroom Proficient

Yes, a pathologist is required to do a report, noting the number of samples received, a description of their physical appearance, and a report on what he sees under the microscope. :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Sarahsmile416 Apprentice

Well, that kind of confirms that she sent the procedure report before the pathologists report because I know she sent it on Friday the 21st...for some reason I truly doubt the pathologist had completed 6-8 biopsies by that point. I guess it's possible, but it seems a little hard to believe. This whole thing has really soured me on some of the medical profession, that's for sure !!

kareng Grand Master

Well, that kind of confirms that she sent the procedure report before the pathologists report because I know she sent it on Friday the 21st...for some reason I truly doubt the pathologist had completed 6-8 biopsies by that point. I guess it's possible, but it seems a little hard to believe. This whole thing has really soured me on some of the medical profession, that's for sure !!

Ideally, a surgeon or GI would make his procedure/operation report right after the procedure, while its fresh in his mind. Then he would either add an addendum to the report to include the path findings, or a separate "discharge summary" or a note that sums it all up. With these outpatient type prodecures, this final note might not be as formal as the one after a long inpatient stay. Many GIs will write a sumnation letter to your primary care doc that can take its place. He should be able to give you a copy of that if that is his summary or you could discuss it with your primary doctor.

either way, ask for an actual copy of the path report. It should include a description of what the samples are labelled which will have the size and location, some hard to understand stuff about how it was looked at and what was seen and a conclusion or diagnosis. 1-2 pages would be average. when you get it, you could copy it here if you want.

want to add: Usually you would expect about 2 days to get the report. This was right before Christmas so they might have tried to get them out quicker to get a day off or there weren't as many specimens to look at because no one wants to do elective procedures right before a holiday.

Sarahsmile416 Apprentice

I understand...and will definitely make sure to ask for the pathologist report...what I am a little skeptical about is her admittedly unsure statement about the inflamed duodenum. She even admits in her report that it could be from the acid reflux but also might not be. Why not wait until she gets the pathologists report back to say something?

Also, why was I not told about the gastritis when I was originally called? I didn't even know it was "noted" until I read the note.

  • 2 weeks later...
Sarahsmile416 Apprentice

A little update. Went to the doctor today and was pleasantly surprised. Apparently it is just her nurse who is a moron...I did find it funny that the nurse wanted as little to do with me as possible after I excoriated her on the phone.

The doctor on the other hand, when I told her I was still having problems she said that I might easily be gluten intolerant (which, duh, but from what I have read on here, she seems to be one of the few doctors who acknowledge it!) and given the amount of inflammation I showed I should give up dairy for awhile. I was just very happy to hear my doctor parrot what I have been reading on here! I have also been doing my food diary all wrong - only recording major reactions and not minor ones, whoops!

Anyway, I asked her for the pathologist's report and she gave it to me. Shorter than I expected (2 pages), but shockingly some things were done that I did not expect (they DID test for eosinophils, which were not present).

Here it is, in most of its entirety:

Clinical impression: Abnormal mucosa in duodenum; normal mucosa entire stomach; erythematous esophagus.

Gross description: Received in zinc-formalin are six fragments of red-tan soft tissue measuring 0.9 cm x 0.6 cm x 0.2 cm in aggregate.

Received in zinc-formalin are two fragments of red-tan soft tissue measuring 0.4 cm x 0.3 cm x 0.2 cm in aggregate.

Received in formalin are two fragments of soft tissue measuring 0.3 cm x 0.3 cm x 0.1 cm in aggregate.

Miscroscopic description:

Small bowel mucosa with foveolar metaplasia and Brunner gland hyperplasia. Giardia and other parasites not identified.

Foveolar cell hyperplasia, edema of lamina propria and minimal inflammation. No evidence of intestinal metaplasia, malignancy or dysplasia. H.pylori not present.

Esophageal mucosa with basal layer hyperplasia and elongation of esophageal papillae. Eosinophils are not present. There is no columnar mucosa present.

Final diagnosis;

Duodenum, Biopsy with Cold Forceps:

Chronic duodenitis with focal foveolar metaplasia and Brunner gland hyperplasia.

No evidence of celiac sprue.

Giardia not identified.

Stomach, biopsy with cold forceps:

Reactive (erosive) gastropathy

Silver stain negative for H.pylori

Distal esophagus, Biopsy with cold forceps

Hyperplastic squamous mucosa most consistent with chronic reflux esophagitis.

There are no eosinophils present.

No evidence of Barrett's esophagus; no glandular mucosa present.

Phew!! Anyone able to decipher the medical speak for me?

Thanks!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - fritz2 replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      13

      Question

    2. - trents replied to Nikki03's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Confused about test results.

    3. - Nikki03 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Confused about test results.

    4. - trents replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      13

      Question

    5. - fritz2 replied to VinnieVan's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      13

      Question


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,768
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sharon Bing
    Newest Member
    Sharon Bing
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • fritz2
      So what relieves the joint pain?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Nikki03! What was the other result from the other physician's lab work? The test result you report in your post is not a celiac disease diagnostic test. It is a test for IGA deficiency. It is also known as "total IGA". There are other IGA antibody tests that are used to diagnose celiac disease but if you are IGA deficient, their scores will be artificially low. Obviously, you are not IGA deficient so if there were other IGA antibody tests run they should be trusted as accurate unless you had been on a gluten free or reduced gluten diet before the blood sample was taken. So, if you have other test results, please post them along with (this is important) their reference ranges. Raw test scores without reference ranges are not necessarily helpful as different labs used different reference ranges. Here is an article that describes the various antibody tests that can be ordered when checking for celiac disease: As you can see, there are IGA tests and there are IGG tests. What are your symptoms? There is another gluten disorder known as Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) that shares many GI symptoms with celiac disease and is 10x more common than celiac disease. There are no tests for NCGS so celiac disease must first be ruled out by formal testing.
    • Nikki03
      I had celiac labs done and got two different result from two physicians. I have tons of celiac symptoms and suspected it for a while now but this has me so confused can you help?    my labs results read as follows  immunoglobulin A QN =419 which was off the chart high but everything but that was in normal range.               Thanks sincerely confused!   
    • trents
      As I mentioned above, NCGS stands for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity. Celiac disease and NCGS share many of the same GI distress symptoms but NCGS does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease and is not an autoimmune condition, as is celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease but there are no tests for it. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. We actually know much more about celiac disease than we do about NCGS. Some experts believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease. The only known antidote for either is total abstinence from gluten. Joint pain is a well-established symptom of celiac disease, one of the more than 200 symptoms on a growing list. And many of them present as non-GI related.
    • fritz2
      Well, as much pain as gluten has caused in the past, there's no way in hell I'm taking gluten on purpose.  What is NCGS?  And are there any remedies to quickly get over the swollen joints? My joints are swollen and hot to the touch and hurt.  For about two weeks they were too painful to even think about using them.  Six weeks later, I still can barely use my hands.  I struggle to get a bottle cap unscrewed they hurt so badly.  Edema in my legs and the knees hurt to walk.  And that was probably a minor exposure as the wheat was listed towards the end of the "contains" list in very fine print we couldn't read without a magnifying glass.
×
×
  • Create New...