Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Drug For Celiac Disease? Would You Take It?


LFitts

Recommended Posts

LFitts Apprentice

When we were at the GI for a follow-up visit this week, there were signs up asking for adult volunteers for Phase III clinical trials for a new drug that will soon be on the market for patients with celiac disease. The drug will supposedly break down gluten and protect patients from damage. I have a pretty good understanding of the drug trial processes and steps, and it will be a very long time (10+ years) before a pediatric version becomes available, assuming the adult form proves to be safe.

I'm interested in knowing if you would take such a drug? Are any of you entering the phase III clinical trials? I would like to hear updates as people begin taking the drug!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Takala Enthusiast

No. These are for formally diagnosed celiacs. They don't acknowledge gluten intolerance. Secondly, it's insane to ask people who don't have problems with willingly complying with a gluten free diet, to further risk their health and continue to create severe auto-immune damage, because a trial would mean that some testers would be getting a placebo, not the drug, and secondly, there is no guarantee the drug would work. I also think that the drug is going to encourage bad behaviors, because of human nature, there are going to be a lot of people who are deliberately then eating gluten anyway, and expecting this drug to "protect" them, just as there are people who just eat way too much junk and fast food in any other category, then expect various statins and diet weight loss pills and hypertensive meds and diabetes meds to "protect" them from the consequences.

Trying to use drugs to make up for the lack of diagnostics and contaminated food supply is doing it backwards, in my opinion.

Christine0125 Contributor

I would consider it as a safety net when dining out or at social gatherings. I would not knowingly ingest gluten even with a drug.

LFitts Apprentice

After reading through these blogs for the last week, it seems to me that many people have ongoing issues that the gluten-free diet is not fully addressing. If the pill reduced zonulin production or otherwise aided in healing the leaky gut, I would be quite tempted to sign myself up as a guinea pig. Of course, it's not my choice since I'm not the one who is sick, but I will definitely be watching for research and developments.

KristenS Rookie

I would absolutely try a drug. I would love to be able to eat whatever I wanted again. I am a foodie, and this restrictive life long diet sucks. As I understand it, the IL-15 drug trials were fast tracked due to the sheer volume of people affected by celiac. I am hopefull they pass clinical trials, and is fast tracked to fda approval. If so, I will be travelling to the US to get some! I would give anything for a croissant... ;)

vbecton Explorer

I would! Only because of my lifestyle. When I'm home in my own country eating gluten isn't necessary. When I'm overseas, it's sometimes unavoidable. And only because I have other medical conditions that further restrict my diet to a paleo type diet (but no fruit for me). When I'm in a 3rd world country and all that's available in a village are some pastries filled with meat...that pill would help. Otherwise I eat from my "prohibitive" meat sources I've smuggled over the border. Sometimes my stash gets confiscated, but I always risk it because I've been caught too many times in small villages and no food source. So, bring it on!!

cavernio Enthusiast

I might try it if trials turned out alright for occasional eating out for celebrations (eg: christmas dinner CC...had to avoid it this year) or going on a trip. But I'm pretty skeptical about many drugs not just for efficacy but side-effects too. Particularly with a drug like this I'd be concerned it'd be geared to break down gliadin only or something and so wouldn't work for barley or oats. And I'm also off dairy and and many others have issues with corn and soy and then there's some foods that are supposed to be gluten free but people still react to as if they had gluten. I can't imagine this drug being anywhere near good enough for me to feel safe while on it.

If there's drugs out there that are designed to stop the immune reaction that would also have it's own issues, like the fact that my peripheral neuropathy isn't apparently caused by the same type of T cells that damaged my intestines and of course if a drug were more general in reducing an immune reaction there's always the worry about other infections.

I don't want to be in trials.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rehh05 Apprentice

I would take a proven drug in a heart beat... but I would not participate in a drug test.

Zibby Rookie

I agree with Cavernio. Drugs have side-effects and some are not identified until they've been on the market for a while. That and I am so sensitive to medications, I think being on a gluten-free diet would be a healthier, more natural approach until the medication is proven safe long-term. It's great though that companies are working on a solution though and I really hope it turns out well!

anngf4life Rookie

I agree with the safety net option for nights out or on vacation but not for everyday, not too big on taking pills.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.