Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pre-diagnosis Stuff


MIddings

Recommended Posts

MIddings Newbie

I tried to respond to someone else's post but it appears to have sent it to the person and not posted it to the board.

I have about a dozen of the symptoms of Celiac plus the complication of severe osteoporosis.

The symptom that finally sent me over the edge was canker sores. I had them repeatedly for four months before I decided maybe a gluten free diet would help. I started the diet on Sat a week ago and the cankers all healed within three days. I stopped having pain/cramping with BM's. I stopped feeling bloated. I have more energy.

Here's my dilemma. Is it imperitive that I go through all the tests to confirm Celiac? If eating this way makes me feel better what is the point?

Then again, if I were hospitalized, would anybody listen to me if I tried to tell them I couldn't eat certain things if it is not documented in my medical record?

What are the benefits to being diagnosed by the medical establishment as opposed to just listening to your body and knowing what you need to stay away from?

Is the diagnosis important so that people don't think you are off your rocker for being so "picky" about your foods? Is it a way to feel validated when people question you?

I am just really confused as to whether I should pursue a diagnosis or not. I am trying to figure out what the benefit vs risk is worth.

I think I will go talk to my doctor about it and get his take on the whole thing. But I would like to hear your thoughts on this.

Even if I did get tested and say the tests actually came back negative, I'd still stay on the diet knowing how much better I feel this way.

Marsha


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



plantime Contributor

Talk to your doctor. If your doctor will accept the results of the diet (like mine did), then have your doctor write it in your chart. The drawback to official diagnosis is insurance: if you have to change companies, then the new company cna claim pre-existing condition and not cover you. It lends validation to your diet, and gives closure to those who have been searching for so many years for answers. How important it is to have a diagnosis depends on you, and what you want. You have to be consuming gluten for the blood tests and biopsies, and are still not guaranteed a correct dx. Are you willing to go through that for a couple of months? You just have to talk to your doctor, and decide what is best for you.

lauradawn Explorer

I personally had the blood work done, which came back strongly positive, and decided not to have any biopsy's done. I felt like, a diet would give me strong enough indication as to if I truly felt better or not. We weighed the pros and cons and decided that there were little pros for us, and cons included invasive procedures, the risk that results could come back negative (which we would likely not trust) costs for the procedures and lab work, and permanet records of Celiac. Sometimes these are not all bad, but it's what we came up with when trying to decide what to do. It is a hard decision. If you would like something but not neccessarily all of it.... you could find someone to do the blood work and see what happens. That takes no time at all, and if you are already established with a Dr you might not have to wait either. Just an idea.

MIddings Newbie

I decided to write a letter to my doctor. Here it is:

Dear......,

As you will remember, I have been to see you several times over the last couple of months complaining of reoccurring canker sores in my mouth, some of them have been quite large. I have had trouble with this since the 3rd week in December. We tried switching from Vioxx to Celebrex with no results. I tried going without the NSAIDS for at least a week with no results. You gave me Valtrex to try and it never helped either. As a last resort you talked of sending me to a dermatologist.

I have been doing research on my own on the causes of canker sores. When I read about Celiac, I was surprised to find that I have at least 13 of the symptoms they list for this disease as well as severe osteoporosis which is listed as a complication of Celiac. Of the symptoms that are listed for this disease, I have been experiencing the following....

Abdominal pain.... Reoccurring

Abdominal bloating.... Reoccurring

Foul-smelling stool.... all the time

Gas...reoccurring

Iron deficiency.... Recently diagnosed

Fatigue.... most of the time

Joint pain.....comes and goes

Muscle cramps....comes and goes

Canker sores......almost constant since Dec.

Skin rash.....comes and goes....it appears on the back of my neck suddenly....burns and

itches and puffs up like a severe burn and lasts for several days and disappears

Indigestion.....occasional

Constipation......reoccurring

Hypoglycemic episodes......reoccurring

Osteoporosis.....severe

I decided to try the gluten free diet for celiac to see if it would make any difference....mainly to the canker sores since this was the most troublesome symptom to me. The abdominal symptoms I have had for years since I was a child, but I never said anything about it to anyone because I just thought that was normal.

After three days on the gluten free diet the canker sores have all healed and I have not had any new ones show up. As of this writing it has been eight days. Not only have the canker sores stopped, but I no longer have the abdominal pain, bloating and gas and I have more energy than I used too.

I realize there are tests that can be done to confirm Celiac. But I also realize a person needs to be consuming gluten for them to turn out right. I am feeling so much better eating this way that I hate to mess myself up just to be able to confirm the diagnosis of Celiac. However, if you know how to do the blood tests or know that the local labs here will process them, I would be willing to eat gluten foods for a short time and have the blood work done. I really do not want to do the small intestinal biopsy though and my husband is really discouraging me from having it done. He doesn

plantime Contributor

Looks good! I hope he accepts the diet, since it is a scientific way of measuring something!

the2ofus Rookie

Hi Marsha,

If you are going to have the blood test done do it with prometheus labs in California. They are supposed to be the most accurate in the country. If you order the test as a comprehensive celiac test they will do a gene test if you other results are negative. Then you would atleast know if it is a possibility. My insurance company approved going there because the local labs do not do the gene test. You can call them and they will send you a postage paid kit to send your blood back to them in. 888-423-5227 www.prometheuslabs.com.

Good luck

Robin

wildones Apprentice

I think your letter to your doctor is great ! It says everything he needs to know to come to the same conclusion that you have. I have seen several time on this board that some people are concerned about being 'officially diagnosed' in case of future hospitalizations. If you are not conscious or aware enough to talk, then you won't be given any foods right ? You would not be force fed any foods against your will right ? If you are well enough to eat, then you are well enough to tell the nurses/doctors about your dietary requirements.

I can't imagine that anyone would require proof of gluten intolerance or celiac disease in order to accomadate your needs. My son has had many hospitalizations, and has a long complicated medical history. He has been to many ERs also, and we have never been required to 'prove' anything about his history.

Hope you continue to feel well and enjoy your gluten-free eating !

Lorraine


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



concernedlady Rookie

Dear Marsha,

You can have your (gluten-free) cake & eat it! You could have a non-invasive stool sample test done, for gluten intolerance, and this stool sample testing can be done WHILE you are gluten-free, and it can be done even a month or more after you've been gluten-free.

See Dr. Kenneth Fine's "EnteroLab" website, about his innovative, reliable, non-invasive testing. Dr. Fine is a credentialed gastroenterologist, who himself has a gluten intolerance (as does his daughter). Here'a a link: Open Original Shared Link

Many people on this forum here, have had EnteroLab testing, and it usually validated their decision to go gluten-free.

Sincerely,

Carol

Open Original Shared Link

plantime Contributor

Wildones, In the event that you are unconscious or unable to communicate for an extended length of time, you WILL be given a "food packet" intravenously. You will not be allowed to starve to death. If no one around you knows that you cannot have certain things, then you will get what you might not be able to have. I do not know how the IV administration would do in regards to the intestinal villi, and I have no desire to find out the hard way!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.