Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

I Think Celiac Testing Is Flawed
0

7 posts in this topic

Celiac Disease (as I currently understand it) means that there is villous atrophy that is being caused by the body’s immune reaction against gliadin proteins. According to literature I’ve read by Dr. Alessio Fasano, an individual can develop Celiac Disease at any time during their lifetime.

Here are the tests that are currently used in the medical community to diagnose Celiac Disease:

  1. Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies (tTG-IgA, tTG-IgG)
  2. Anti-Gliadin Antibodies (AGA-IgA, AGA-IgG)
  3. Anti-Endomysial Antibodies (EMA-IgA, EMA-IgG)
  4. Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibodies (DGP-IgA, DGP-IgA)
  5. Total IgA count

Here are the reference ranges for the above-mentioned tests:

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgA:

0-19 is defined as normal

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgG:

0-19 is defined as normal

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgA:

0-3 is defined as normal

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgG:

0-5 is defined as normal

Total IgA Antibody count:

70-400 is defined as normal

Let’s try and define “normal.” What does “normal” mean? Does this mean that people who are perfectly healthy, who are having no reaction to gluten at all, have those numbers? Or does it just mean that people who may be having a reaction to gluten, but not enough to cause villous atrophy, may have those numbers?

I especially find “weak positive” vs “positive” to be hilarious. What does “weak positive” mean? I mean, come on! Does “weak positive” mean they THINK it might cause villous atrophy?

I suppose that scientists and/or doctors have arrived at these numbers as their definition of what (they think) is (maybe) going to cause villous atrophy. However, there are many questions and doubts I have about this, as follows:

1. How do they know that these numbers will or will not cause villous atrophy? What if a DGP IgA value of 15 causes villous atrophy in some people whereas a number of 21 does not cause villous atrophy in others?

2. What if the guy with the 21 number does not have villous atrophy yet because his body only started reacting to gliadin proteins a few months ago and not enough time has passed to develop villous atrophy?

3. Is villous atrophy all we care about? What other forms of damage can a DGP-IgA value of 20+ be doing? What about a value of 15? 10? 5? 1 even?

4. If you have a number greater than 0 of any of these SELF antibodies, doesn’t that mean you have a form of autoimmune disorder? If not, then does the body just make these antibodies just because it feels like it? Is the human body programmed by evolution to make at least a certain amount of these self antibodies (I seriously doubt it), or does it make them in response to stimuli?

5. If the latter, can the stimuli be anything besides gliadin and glutenin proteins? If so, what?

My theory: if your body is making ANY antibodies against SELF tissues, you have an autoimmune disorder, but I don't know what is causing it, nor can I tell you what type of damage it is doing to your body. I know, that's very helpful, isn't it?

What do you guys think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Hi Seeking.

Very thought provoking post and you ask some of the same questions that I have been asking myself as well. I too would like to know how they come up with establishing the ranges of normalcy. As of yet, I haven't found out the answers despite looking. I do know that my neurologist, when telling me my test results (which were 'inconclusive'), looked up at me and said, "Don't worry about that because who knows how many people in the test range were actually unconfirmed celiacs and skewed the ranges".

In one of Dr. Mario Hadjivassiliou's (UK researcher in gluten ataxia) interviews that I read on the celiac about.com page with Jane Anderson, he stated that anyone with elevated IGA should try a gluten free diet.

I have been trying to understand the ttg Iga response as well but am having a hard time wrapping my head around some of it. There are different kinds of ttg: tttg 2 (intestinal celiac), ttg3 (DH) and ttg6 (gluten ataxia - which is currently being developed for testing of gluten ataxia). So, what exactly is ttg (an enzyme, I believe) and is IgA specifically linked to ttg or is it linked other kinds of enzymes in the body but they only test for the ttg IgA?

Sorry that I can only offer more questions here and not answers but I would like to add in my voice and ask if anyone else has any answers for your questions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a lot of time, but I wanted to make a note, which I think is important:

You seem to be assuming that test results are ACTUALLY WHAT EXISTS. Tests are, by their nature, imprecise things. You get a reading of "3" on something, and there's a margin of error. Maybe what's really in your body is a 1 or a 6 (or something else - error varies by test, test type, and many, many factors). So, there needs to be some accounting for the fact that there is error in a test.

Additionally, "normal" ranges are generally set by running the test on a "large" group of "healthy" control subjects to find out what the normal range of results is. Various statistics are run, and you get what normal ranges are. Is this prone to mistake? Yes. Is this a less than perfect answer? Yes. Is it the best method we've got at the moment? Yes.

Finally, with celiac in particular, when people come up with a new blood test, you have to have something to compare it to, and that has been the classic standard of an endoscopy, which is looking for villous atrophy. So, yes, there is a bias that way. Because there is no other well established standard to compare it to.

Is testing flawed? Yes. It's getting better, but it's hardly likely to ever be perfect. Measuring these sorts of things in the human body is extraordinarily difficult, both from a "how the heck do we do a useful measurement accurately" and from the "what is it that we're measuring for".

But, you know, there is a LOT in the world that is flawed. We work with what we've got.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Tiffany. Well said.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seeking,

I'd like to say thanks for posting those questions since it motivated me to search a little harder for a few things. I found a laboratory medicine wiki for the second year university students at the University of California. This link outlines how labs establish the reference ranges for testing:

http://ucsdlabmed.wi...t.com/chapter-1

Also, in answer to your third question about villous atrophy being the sole concern of damage from antibodies, in gluten ataxia research, the atrophy or shrinkage of the cerebellum as a result of the ttg 6 IgA antibodies attacking the Pukinje cells contained within it is also used as a marker.

In answer to your fifth question, a very recent study came out in which they drew the conclusion that continued unresponsivity to a gluten free diet could be due to antibody cross reacitivity to non-gliadin foods. You can download the PDF of the study here:

www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=26626

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I don't think that it is flawed so much as there isn't enough known yet. They are researching and trying to figure it out as fast as they can with all the difficulties involved. Here is an article about the difficulties with funding with medical research: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2013/01/14/congress-is-killing-medical-research/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your fifth question, a very recent study came out in which they drew the conclusion that continued unresponsivity to a gluten free diet could be due to antibody cross reacitivity to non-gliadin foods. You can download the PDF of the study here:

www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=26626

This source says "We also observed significant cross-reactivity between a-gliadin 33-mer and various food antigens, but some of these reactions were associated with the contamination of non-gluten foods with traces of gluten."

It could be from cross reactivity or contamination.

In my experience, I don't react to things when I grow them myself, even if I do when I get the item elsewhere. There is also the problem of botanically unrelated items having very similar reactivity. I believe it is more likely to be contamination than cross reactivity.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,645
    • Total Posts
      918,443
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How effective is HD skin biopsy after being gluten free for a year
      Looks like you got some good info from previous posters.   I don't understand why you and your doctor think that dairy contains gluten?  Lactose is a sugar not a protein like gluten.  I think you have some other issues.  
    • Question on posting
      I made an informative video for Celiac Awareness Month that demonstrates how small 20ppm is. Am I allowed to post a vimeo link? Thanks!
    • Celiac Awareness on NBC Nightly News
      http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/celiac-disease-affecting-millions-of-americans-often-goes-undiagnosed-692131907739   This was on last Tuesday. So happy that a popular national news program is spreading good information!
    • The US Preventative Services Task Force needs our help - tell them why Celiac screening is important!
      I am so angry. I am all about universal screening for Celiac Disease. It is a tricky disease to diagnose. Your only symptoms may be joint pain, depression, or weak nails, which people will try to cure with medication or a good manicure. With roughly 80% of the Celiac population remaining undiagnosed, universal screening could save thousands of lives. This article popped up in my twitter feed regarding US physicians who are unsure whether universal screening would provide “health benefits” for those who exhibit no symptoms (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-celiac-screening-idUSKCN0XU2G6?utm_content=buffer3ed50&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer) First of all, no symptom is a symptom! There is something called “Silent Celiac Disease”, and I personally know several people who have it. They experience no outward symptoms caused by gluten consumption, but their insides are being torn apart. If they eat gluten, they may not feel it, but they are highly at risk for long term complications such as cancer, miscarriages, and osteoporosis, just to name a few. Also, let’s consider the non-GI related symptoms of Celiac. Doctors, how many times does someone walk into your office and say, “Gee, Doc, could you test me for Celiac Disease? I have (insert one of the following)”: asthma bladder infections dental problems dandruff high blood pressure headaches blurred vision leg cramps back pain pale skin brittle nails acne bad bread mood swings ADD Anxiety Depression a short temper night terrors panic attacks irrational anger sinus pressure Those are just a few of the symptoms that people don’t think to associate with Celiac Disease, and I’m sure that you, Mr. Doctor, will not test someone with Celiac Disease if they have dandruff. This is why so many people are undiagnosed! People do not recognize the symptoms and doctors won’t think to give them a blood test. This is why I always say – You cannot know that you do not have Celiac Disease until you get tested. “One concern with widespread screening is that biopsies aren’t risk-free and may confirm cases of celiac disease that weren’t causing problems for patients and didn’t necessarily require treatment, Krist noted.” WHAT?????? First of all, most Celiac screening starts with a gene test or a blood test. That aside, ALL confirmed cases of Celiac Disease require treatment!! Untreated Celiac Disease can cause many problems in the future. “Guidelines for gastroenterologists recommend celiac screening for people with a close relative with celiac and for diabetics who are at increased risk for the disease, Murray said by email.” I was the first person in my family to be diagnosed. 80% of Celiacs don’t know they have it. I would have never been diagnosed if my gastroenterologist said, “Well you don’t have diabetes and no one in your family has it….” No one in my family had heard about Celiac Disease, let alone had been tested for it. And we have all of the tradition GI symptoms. This is not a rare disease. About 1% of the population has Celiac Disease. Take a look at your facebook friends list – have 500 friends? Odds are that you know four or five friends with Celiac. MAYBE one of them will be diagnosed. Maybe. The others will be suffering in silence. “The USPSTF, a government-backed independent organization that reviews medical evidence, issues recommendations that are closely watched by doctors and insurers. This is the first time the USPSTF has weighed in on screening for celiac disease, and the task force will accept public comments until May 30 before releasing final guidelines.” This brought me to the USPSTF website. In their draft, here is what is listed as “Potential Harms” of screening in asymptomatic populations. I’ve included my response: False positive – there are rarely false positives Unnecessary serologic tests and biopsies – umm…only do a biopsy if you have a positive blood test. And what’s so bad about a blood test? Anxiety of complications from testing – I had much more anxiety in my pre-Celiac days, not knowing if I would poop my pants at work. “Some patients with positive serology who do not undergo histologic confirmation may embark on efforts to avoid dietary gluten, which can increase costs and burdens and may result in decreased quality of life” “– I’m glad that you think my life is so terrible. “Limited evidence from long-term followup studies have shown that some persons with biopsy-confirmed celiac disease may never develop symptoms or complications” – I’m not going to risk getting cancer, are you??? The USPSTF is taking public responses to their draft, all of which must be submitted by May 30th. I highly urge you to write in and explain why universal screening is important. My Celiac diagnosis saved my life. If universal screening can do the same for a huge portion of the population – I am all for it. This could be the most important thing you do for Celiac Awareness Month. Read the draft and write to the USPSTF here. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/draft-recommendation-statement150/celiac-disease-screening
    • Celiac.com: Full month of educational opportunities planned at library
      He will also be offering free Tai Chi classes at WCPL every Tuesday, ... the varied symptoms of Celiac disease and the necessity to follow a gluten-free ... View the full article
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • celiac sharon  »  cyclinglady

      Hello cycling lady, have you noticed my picture is showing up as you?  Have no idea why but it's rather disconcerting to see my picture and your words 😉  Do you know how to fix it?  You seem to have far more experience with this board than I do
      · 1 reply
    • Larry Gessner  »  cyclinglady

      Hi There, I don't know if there is a place for videos in the forum. I just watched "The Truth About Gluten" I think it is a good video. I would like to share it somewhere but don't know where it should go. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
      Here is the link if you have never watched it.
      https://youtu.be/IU6jVEwpjnE Thank You,
      Larry
      · 2 replies
    • ChiaChick  »  Peaceflower

      Hi Peaceflower, Just wanted to say thank you for the chat.
      · 0 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,738
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Ladywolf
    Joined