Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Think Celiac Testing Is Flawed


Seeking2012

Recommended Posts

Seeking2012 Contributor

Celiac Disease (as I currently understand it) means that there is villous atrophy that is being caused by the body’s immune reaction against gliadin proteins. According to literature I’ve read by Dr. Alessio Fasano, an individual can develop Celiac Disease at any time during their lifetime.

Here are the tests that are currently used in the medical community to diagnose Celiac Disease:

  1. Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies (tTG-IgA, tTG-IgG)
  2. Anti-Gliadin Antibodies (AGA-IgA, AGA-IgG)
  3. Anti-Endomysial Antibodies (EMA-IgA, EMA-IgG)
  4. Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibodies (DGP-IgA, DGP-IgA)
  5. Total IgA count

Here are the reference ranges for the above-mentioned tests:

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgA:

0-19 is defined as normal

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody IgG:

0-19 is defined as normal

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgA:

0-3 is defined as normal

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgG:

0-5 is defined as normal

Total IgA Antibody count:

70-400 is defined as normal

Let’s try and define “normal.” What does “normal” mean? Does this mean that people who are perfectly healthy, who are having no reaction to gluten at all, have those numbers? Or does it just mean that people who may be having a reaction to gluten, but not enough to cause villous atrophy, may have those numbers?

I especially find “weak positive” vs “positive” to be hilarious. What does “weak positive” mean? I mean, come on! Does “weak positive” mean they THINK it might cause villous atrophy?

I suppose that scientists and/or doctors have arrived at these numbers as their definition of what (they think) is (maybe) going to cause villous atrophy. However, there are many questions and doubts I have about this, as follows:

1. How do they know that these numbers will or will not cause villous atrophy? What if a DGP IgA value of 15 causes villous atrophy in some people whereas a number of 21 does not cause villous atrophy in others?

2. What if the guy with the 21 number does not have villous atrophy yet because his body only started reacting to gliadin proteins a few months ago and not enough time has passed to develop villous atrophy?

3. Is villous atrophy all we care about? What other forms of damage can a DGP-IgA value of 20+ be doing? What about a value of 15? 10? 5? 1 even?

4. If you have a number greater than 0 of any of these SELF antibodies, doesn’t that mean you have a form of autoimmune disorder? If not, then does the body just make these antibodies just because it feels like it? Is the human body programmed by evolution to make at least a certain amount of these self antibodies (I seriously doubt it), or does it make them in response to stimuli?

5. If the latter, can the stimuli be anything besides gliadin and glutenin proteins? If so, what?

My theory: if your body is making ANY antibodies against SELF tissues, you have an autoimmune disorder, but I don't know what is causing it, nor can I tell you what type of damage it is doing to your body. I know, that's very helpful, isn't it?

What do you guys think?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Kamma Explorer

Hi Seeking.

Very thought provoking post and you ask some of the same questions that I have been asking myself as well. I too would like to know how they come up with establishing the ranges of normalcy. As of yet, I haven't found out the answers despite looking. I do know that my neurologist, when telling me my test results (which were 'inconclusive'), looked up at me and said, "Don't worry about that because who knows how many people in the test range were actually unconfirmed celiacs and skewed the ranges".

In one of Dr. Mario Hadjivassiliou's (UK researcher in gluten ataxia) interviews that I read on the celiac about.com page with Jane Anderson, he stated that anyone with elevated IGA should try a gluten free diet.

I have been trying to understand the ttg Iga response as well but am having a hard time wrapping my head around some of it. There are different kinds of ttg: tttg 2 (intestinal celiac), ttg3 (DH) and ttg6 (gluten ataxia - which is currently being developed for testing of gluten ataxia). So, what exactly is ttg (an enzyme, I believe) and is IgA specifically linked to ttg or is it linked other kinds of enzymes in the body but they only test for the ttg IgA?

Sorry that I can only offer more questions here and not answers but I would like to add in my voice and ask if anyone else has any answers for your questions.

tarnalberry Community Regular

I don't have a lot of time, but I wanted to make a note, which I think is important:

You seem to be assuming that test results are ACTUALLY WHAT EXISTS. Tests are, by their nature, imprecise things. You get a reading of "3" on something, and there's a margin of error. Maybe what's really in your body is a 1 or a 6 (or something else - error varies by test, test type, and many, many factors). So, there needs to be some accounting for the fact that there is error in a test.

Additionally, "normal" ranges are generally set by running the test on a "large" group of "healthy" control subjects to find out what the normal range of results is. Various statistics are run, and you get what normal ranges are. Is this prone to mistake? Yes. Is this a less than perfect answer? Yes. Is it the best method we've got at the moment? Yes.

Finally, with celiac in particular, when people come up with a new blood test, you have to have something to compare it to, and that has been the classic standard of an endoscopy, which is looking for villous atrophy. So, yes, there is a bias that way. Because there is no other well established standard to compare it to.

Is testing flawed? Yes. It's getting better, but it's hardly likely to ever be perfect. Measuring these sorts of things in the human body is extraordinarily difficult, both from a "how the heck do we do a useful measurement accurately" and from the "what is it that we're measuring for".

But, you know, there is a LOT in the world that is flawed. We work with what we've got.

psawyer Proficient

Thank you, Tiffany. Well said.

Kamma Explorer

Hi Seeking,

I'd like to say thanks for posting those questions since it motivated me to search a little harder for a few things. I found a laboratory medicine wiki for the second year university students at the University of California. This link outlines how labs establish the reference ranges for testing:

Open Original Shared Link

Also, in answer to your third question about villous atrophy being the sole concern of damage from antibodies, in gluten ataxia research, the atrophy or shrinkage of the cerebellum as a result of the ttg 6 IgA antibodies attacking the Pukinje cells contained within it is also used as a marker.

In answer to your fifth question, a very recent study came out in which they drew the conclusion that continued unresponsivity to a gluten free diet could be due to antibody cross reacitivity to non-gliadin foods. You can download the PDF of the study here:

www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=26626

dilettantesteph Collaborator

I don't think that it is flawed so much as there isn't enough known yet. They are researching and trying to figure it out as fast as they can with all the difficulties involved. Here is an article about the difficulties with funding with medical research: Open Original Shared Link

dilettantesteph Collaborator

In answer to your fifth question, a very recent study came out in which they drew the conclusion that continued unresponsivity to a gluten free diet could be due to antibody cross reacitivity to non-gliadin foods. You can download the PDF of the study here:

www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=26626

This source says "We also observed significant cross-reactivity between a-gliadin 33-mer and various food antigens, but some of these reactions were associated with the contamination of non-gluten foods with traces of gluten."

It could be from cross reactivity or contamination.

In my experience, I don't react to things when I grow them myself, even if I do when I get the item elsewhere. There is also the problem of botanically unrelated items having very similar reactivity. I believe it is more likely to be contamination than cross reactivity.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,193
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ChrissiG
    Newest Member
    ChrissiG
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Hi, @thejayland10, Do you still consume dairy?  Dairy can cause increased tTg IgA levels in some people with celiac disease who react to casein, the protein in dairy, just like to gluten.   You might try cutting out the processed gluten free foods.  Try a whole foods, no carbohydrate Paleo diet instead, like the AIP diet (the Autoimmune Protocol Diet by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, a Celiac herself). Processed gluten free foods can be full of excess carbohydrates which can alter your microbiome leading to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO).  SIBO is found in some people who are not responding to a gluten free diet.  SIBO can elevate tTg IgA levels.  The AIP diet cuts out sources of carbohydrates like rice, potatoes (nightshades), quinoa, peas, lentils, legumes, which starves out the SIBO bacteria.  Better bacteria can then proliferate.   I followed the AIP diet to get rid of my SIBO.  It's a strict diet, but my digestive tract had time to rest and heal.  I started feeling better within a few days.  Feeling improvement so soon made sticking to the AIP diet much easier. References: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth among patients with celiac disease unresponsive to a gluten free diet https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7759221/   Luminal antigliadin antibodies in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9260801/#:~:text=Luminal total IgA concentrations (p,response to local bacterial antigens.   Potato glycoalkaloids adversely affect intestinal permeability and aggravate inflammatory bowel disease https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12479649/
    • trents
      First, welcome to the forum, @boy-wonder! Second, a little clarification in terminology is in order. Granted, inconsistency is rampant when it comes to the terminology associated with gluten disorders, but it has more or less become settled in this fashion: "Gluten intolerance" is a general term that car refer to either celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). "Gluten Sensitivity" is the shortened version of NCGS. Third, Celiac disease is not an allergy to gluten. It is an autoimmune disorder characterized by gluten ingestion causing the immunes system to attack the lining of the small bowel, causing damage to it over time due to the constant inflammation that wears down the "villi" (mucosal finger-like projections that make up the lining). Over a significant period of time as gluten continues to be consumed, this generally results in impaired nutrient absorption. There are specific blood antibody tests available to check for celiac disease but the testing will not be valid while on a reduced gluten diet or a gluten free diet. Those already having having begun a gluten free diet must go back to consuming generous amounts of gluten for a period of weeks if they wish to pursue testing for celiac disease. Fourth, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten from your life is the antidote for both. Fifth, you state that you are convince you don't have celiac disease by are just "gluten intolerant" (aka, gluten sensitive). How do you know that? It seems to me you are making a dangerous assumption here. I suggest you consider getting formally tested for celiac disease.
    • AllyJR
      Has anyone found a gluten free parakeet seed mix? I can't find a single one! My doctor wants me to make sure all pet food in the house is gluten free but I'm not sure if that's even possible with parakeets. We love our birds so much! I'm wondering if anyone has ever made their own bird seed mix if gluten free ones are not available. 
    • boy-wonder
      Hi, new member. About me, I had been suffering with weight gain, bloating and irregular and extreme bowel habits for a year or so. For example, I went on holiday in 2023, then again I  2024 at the same time of year and every shirt I wore in 2023 didn't fit anymore, couldn't even do the buttons up. Being in my mid 50s I put it down to age and middle aged spread. I'd been lucky all my life having good metabolism and being able to eat anything and as much as I like without putting on any weight, it drove my other half mad. Over a conversation with a friend health and age Related stuff came up and he mentioned someone he knew who had recently found out they were gluten intolerant,  I looked it up and had every one of 8 or so symptoms listed. Bloating,  weight gain,  headaches, brain fog,  constipation, etc etc. I took the decision to give going gluten free a try. Within 1 week I had lost 4 lb, now 7 weeks in I've lost 13 lb. I feel much better in general,  the bloating has severely subsided, it used to keep me awake at night as I felt so uncomfortable.  So pretty much a success story, as everyone here knows,  going gluten free isn't always easy, and eating out can be awkward,  but I consider myself lucky that I appear to have an intolerance rather than an allergy or being celiac.  I can deal with most of the gluten free options at the supermarket but, the big one for me is bread, I love bread, and the gluten free options I've tried are pretty poor. I was at a posh black tie event last night and chose all the food options I thought would be gluten free,  however,  there was bread on the table and I couldn't resist it, I had I small piece of bread,  god it was good, I wanted more but I resisted. Today I feel a bit dodgy, my stomach is churning, and I generally feel a bit urgh.  So here's the question, is that really down to 1 small piece of bread or is it coincidence?  I'd be interested in hearing how other people have reacted to a similar situation,  as I was considering having a day off every now and then and enjoying some lovely fresh bread.
    • ValerieC
      Does anybody know of a guide that ranks reevaluates universities and colleges in terms of their accommodation of celiac disease or food allergies?   Thanks in advance for any leads! Valerie 
×
×
  • Create New...