Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. ×


Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-m):

  • You've found your Celiac Tribe! Join our like-minded, private community and share your story, get encouragement and connect with others.

    💬

    • Sign In
    • Sign Up
  • Jefferson Adams
    Jefferson Adams

    By Jefferson Adams •

    Are Gluten-Free Foods Misleading Consumers?

    Followers 0
    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    Are gluten-free foods causing confusion for shoppers?

    Are Gluten-Free Foods Misleading Consumers? - Are consumers being misled by gluten-free foods? Photo: CC--Elaine with Grey Cats
    Caption: Are consumers being misled by gluten-free foods? Photo: CC--Elaine with Grey Cats

    Celiac.com 06/13/2017 - Are consumers wrongly assuming gluten-free foods to be nutritionally equivalent to their gluten-containing counterparts? Are they being mislead?

    That's the subject of a recent talk presented at the 50th Annual Congress of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). Among the evidence cited was that gluten-free items have a significantly higher energy content and a different nutritional composition to their gluten-containing counterparts.


    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):




    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12-m):



    The presentation also notes that many gluten-containing products, especially breads, pastas, pizzas and wheat-based flours, contain up to three times more protein than their gluten-free counterparts.

    In all, the study assessed 654 gluten-free products, and compared them against 655 gluten-containing products. Among the group's key findings were that gluten-free breads had significantly higher content of lipids and saturated fatty acids; gluten-free pasta had significantly lower content of sugar and protein; and gluten-free biscuits had significantly lower content of protein and significantly higher content of lipids.

    These differences can have adverse effects on children's growth, and increase the risk of childhood obesity.

    The gist of the presentation is that gluten-free products cannot be considered as substitutes for their gluten-containing counterparts, and that numerous gluten-free items should reformulated using healthier ingredients to help promote healthy nutrition in children.

    Not only are gluten-free products generally poorer in their nutritional composition, but consumers may not be unaware of the crucial differences, due to poor nutritional labelling. Dr Sandra Martínez -Barona, fellow lead researcher, states that "labelling needs to clearly indicate this so that patients, parents and carers can make informed decisions. Consumers should also be provided with guidance to enhance their understanding of the nutritional compositions of products, in both gluten-free and gluten-containing products, to allow them to make more informed purchases and ensure a healthier diet is followed."

    ESPGHAN expert and lead researcher, Dr Joaquim Calvo Lerma, adds that "…it is imperative that foods marketed as substitutes are reformulated to ensure that they truly do have similar nutritional values. This is especially important for children, as a well-balanced diet is essential to healthy growth and development."

    Stay tuned to see how the gluten-free food industry responds to efforts by ESPGHAN to improve both gluten-free product formulation, and gluten-free labeling to help people make better nutritional choices.

    Source:


    Followers 0
    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Guest Diana

    Guest Diana

    Posted

    Decreasing calories, sugar, saturated fat and increasing protein (and fiber) in gluten-free foods would be nice, but as long as the nutritional label accurately reflects the actual nutritional composition, that is not "misleading" consumers. It is up to consumers to actually look at the amount of protein, saturated fat, sugar, calories, etc. on the label and make sensible choices in the context of their overall diet to ensure adequate nutrition in terms of macronutrients, etc.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest LoRo

    It's hard enough to get the gluten free version to taste good and have an acceptable texture/cohesiveness, without worrying about making it nutritionally equivalent to its glutinous counterparts. Pasta, bread, and baked goods are not the healthy part of anyone's diet, I don't care what the damn food pyramid says. Fresh fruits, vegetables, pulses, lean meat, and fish are the healthy parts - grains and rice provide some nutrients but are mainly filler calories. I would guess that parents of Celiac children are much more aware of their children's nutritional needs, are more likely to consult with a dietitian about their children's diet, and are probably feeding their kids more fruit, veg, and pulses to begin with!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Pippy

    Guest Pippy

    Posted

    I could be wrong, but I see most, if not all heavily processed food as junk food. If one wants proper nutrition, we have to eat food from the earth that has not been bastardized by over cooking and adding a bunch of vitamins later, giving it the appearance (labels are deceive) of having nutrition. Many gluten-free foods are made with rice, rice is often full of arsenic. Is that what we want to be putting in our bodies or our children's bodies?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Laura

    Guest Laura

    Posted

    "Gluten-free breads had significantly higher content of lipids and saturated" = GOOD! After my Near Death from Gluten experience, I discovered it was necessary to exercise cautious ingredient/label review. Hunger drove me to eat more saturated fat that was previously routinely trimmed away. I fry most foods in liberal amounts cold-pressed olive oil. After 6 months, I returned to the doctor's office to be told that the total cholesterol had risen but in the correct proportions: good cholesterol much higher and bad cholesterol dropped significantly. The physician asked how I had adjusted my diet. My reply was; "I increased consumption of saturated fats and fry everything in liberal amounts of olive oil." The physicians reply was; "What did you really do?"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • Join eNewsletter

  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University, and has authored more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously served as SF Health News Examiner for Examiner.com, and devised health and medical content for Sharecare.com. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of the book "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-m):



  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 03/01/2017 - Do people who eat a gluten-free diet face an increased exposure to toxic metals like arsenic and mercury, and thus possibly higher rates of cardiovascular disease, cancer and neurological effects?
    That's a very possible scenario, according to a report published in the journal Epidemiology. Maria Argos, assistant professor of epidemiology in the UIC School of Public Health, and her colleagues searched data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for a link between gluten-free diet and biomarkers of toxic metals in blood and urine.
    Of the 7,471 people they surveyed between 2009 and 2014, they found 73 participants who reported eating a gluten-free diet.
    People on a gluten-free diet higher concentrations of arsenic in their urine, and mercury in their blood, than those who ate a non-gluten-free diet. In fact, arsenic levels for gluten-free eaters were nearly twice as high, and mercury levels were 70 percent higher.
    So, does a gluten-free diet pose an actual health risk? Do people need to make any immediate dietary changes?
    While noteworthy, Argos says the findings indicate the need for more studies, "to determine if there are corresponding health consequences that could be related to higher levels of exposure to arsenic and mercury by eating gluten-free."
    Argos points out that the EU has in place regulations for food-based arsenic exposure, while the United States does not. The question that needs to be answered if whether rice flour consumption increases the risk for exposure to arsenic. An answer to that requires further study.
    Source: University of Illinois at Chicago
    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 04/20/2017 - More people than ever are following a gluten-free diet, but does the diet carry health risks that could cause harm in the long run? That's a very possible scenario, according to a report published in the journal Epidemiology.
    The report presents strong data to suggest that numerous gluten-free food staples contain high levels of toxic metals, which means that many gluten-free eaters could face higher risks for cancer and other chronic illnesses.
    Moreover, the US studies both reveal that people who follow a gluten-free diet have twice as much arsenic in their urine as those who eat a non-gluten-free diet. They also have 70 per cent more mercury in their blood, along with high levels of other toxic metals, such as lead and cadmium. Clearly the report invites further study to determine if these potentially negative effects are merely statistical, or if they are actually represented in corresponding numbers of gluten-free dieters.
    So, look for more study to see if people eating gluten-free are actually having higher rates of cancer and other toxic metal-related disorders.
    Meantime, you may be able to mitigate negative effects of a gluten-free diet by choosing products with lower levels of toxic metals. California-grown rice, for example seems to have lower levels compared to Chinese rice.
    If you follow a gluten-free diet for medical reasons, keep an eye out for symptoms related to toxic metal exposure, and consult a doctor if you think you are experiencing such symptoms.
    Read more at: Celiac.com.
    Does a Gluten-free Diet Mean Higher Arsenic and Mercury Levels? Read more at The Daily Mail.


  • Popular Now

HONcode Trustworthy Health Info Compliance

0_HONConduct789191_hr1.jpg

This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.
View HONcode Certificate.

Navigation

About Celiac.com


Join eNewsletter

Popular Articles

Cookie Use

 

This site places cookies on your device (Cookie Settings). Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.     

×
×
  • Create New...