Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Test Results...now I Have Questions


mommy2krj

Recommended Posts

mommy2krj Explorer

Ok, so my youngest (6 year old) has already tested positive through blood work and we go for his endoscopy on the 19th. I don't have copies of his blood work results as they are with the docs in Madison and I didn't think to get them when we were down there last time.

 

Now. I have had everyone in the house go in for blood work. Myself, my husband, 18 year old daughter and 15 year old son. I went in today to the same lab tech that took my older kids' blood on Wednesday...2 days ago. I asked her when I could expect the results from the blood work and she told me by Wednesday for mine (granted I had a little more done than the kids as they are also running lipids and stuff for my thyroid) and that the kids' would probably be back on Monday as they had to be sent out to Marshfield.

Well...we went also for little guy's pre op appointment so I spoke with the pediatrician. At the end of the appointment he lets me know that the older two's labs came back and they are both negative. Huh. That was pretty quick considering what I had just been told and the fact that my husband's hasn't come back yet and he did his a week ago.

 

Now...here are my questions....I'll type out the results exactly as they appear on the page. It doesn't even seem like they ran the right tests....aside from the TTG...though maybe it's just that they didn't run a complete test? I don't know...I don't even know what I'm looking at...so here it is:

 

For my 15 year old son:

Tests: (1) Immunoglobulin A # (2458-8)

OBSERVATION                          VALUE                              EXPECTED

IGA                                              147 mg/dL                         66-436

 

Tests: (2) TIS.TRANSGLUTAMINASE  IGA AB (L.TGAA)

OBSERVATION                          VALUE                             EXPECTED

TTG IGA AB                               <1.2 U/mL                         0.0-3.9

 

 

 

 

For my 18 year old daughter:

Tests: (1) IMMUNOGLOBULIN A # (2458-8)

OBSERVATION                           VALUE                             EXPECTED

IGA                                               289 mg/dL                          66-436

 

Tests: (2) TIS.TRASGLUTAMINASE  IGA AB (L.TGAA)

OBSERVATION                               VALUE                        EXPECTED

TTG IGA AB                                    <1.2 U/mL                        0.0-3.9

 

 

 

Both of these labs were done at the local hospital under MEDITECHLAB if that makes any difference. I am going to bring these results with me to the GI when we go down on Wednesday to see what she says. I may need to find a new pediatrician as I think I've lost all faith in the one I have. :( *sigh* Maybe I'll just move them all over to my doctor since she's family practice. At least she understand what it means to be gluten free as she is herself.

Any thoughts on those test results would be most appreciated thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

I think you are right that the only celiac test they ran was the tTG IgA. That is pretty common; my city only runs the tTG IgA and then if that is positive they run the EMA IgA.   :rolleyes: 

 

The IgA test they ran was the total serum IgA which is a control test to make sure the patient makes enough IgA for a valid  tTG IgA test - about 5% of celiacs are deficient in IgA so their tTG IgA test would not be accurate.

 

That being said, the tTG IgA test does not catch every case of celiac disease that it tests for. The tTG IgA has a sensitivity of 75-95% which means that 5-25% of undiagnosed celiacs eating a diet with gluten will test negative on those tests. They could not be celiacs but they have a 5-24% chance that they are celiacs and it was just missed somehow. With a history of celiac in the family, I think having other tests done could be helpful.

 

The full celiac panel is:

  • tTG IgA and tTG IgG
  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (newer tests that are better at catching the disease in kids)
  • EMA IgA (very similar to the tTG tests but positive after a high level of villi damage is done)
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (older and less reliable tests but thought to show NCGI (gluten sensitivity) unlike the other tests which just indicate villi damage - as I understand it)

This report, on pages 11-12, discusses the various tests as well as their sensitivity and specificity (how often it indicates celiac disease when positive): Open Original Shared Link

 

Good luck with getting answers and with your other labs.  :)

momma bee Rookie

We had the same tests run here on our family once our littlest one was diagnosed and we all came back negative as well (but hers had been negative as well)... I am wondering too if more tests need to be run to be sure! Seems odd and a bit un-nerving!

Good luck and let us know if they agree to run more tests in you all...I am thinking when finally meet the gi doc once the diagnosed one is over 6 months gluten free we can ask her about more testing so I would love to know what they recommend to you!

mommy2krj Explorer

Thanks for the replies. :) I do plan on talking to the GI about the whole family. I'm curious what she has to say. Still waiting for the results for myself and my husband. Going to have to call on Monday to see if the results are in for his....they should be!

 

I do plan on having the entire house go gluten free after the 19th. I've sat here and watched my little guy get sick and be in pain from something that is preventable....I'm not willing to even take the chance that there would be cc because someone wasn't careful enough with their food in my house. Bad enough we'll have to deal with it outside our house. Not to mention I'm not a big fan of cooking to begin with....so cooking two separate meals? Not gonna happen! Which is why I wanted everyone tested now. Regardless of whether they have Celiac's or not...if you live here you will be gluten free!

 

I will come back and post what the GI says and if my husband or I or both of us are Celiac or not. I also plan on trying to keep track of the things I notice in both my Celiac child and the older two that "aren't".

I just feel so bad having to continue to feed him like this when I know it doesn't make him feel good. :( We went the whole foods route thinking we were doing something healthy for our kids....and look where that got us! We will stay with the whole foods...it'll just be devoid of grains (or at least the ones that hurt the little guy!)

nora-n Rookie

I would ask for the DGP IGG test as well, they are standard now together with the Ttg-IgA over here in northern europe

nvsmom Community Regular

I do plan on having the entire house go gluten free after the 19th. I've sat here and watched my little guy get sick and be in pain from something that is preventable....I'm not willing to even take the chance that there would be cc because someone wasn't careful enough with their food in my house. Bad enough we'll have to deal with it outside our house. Not to mention I'm not a big fan of cooking to begin with....so cooking two separate meals? Not gonna happen! Which is why I wanted everyone tested now. Regardless of whether they have Celiac's or not...if you live here you will be gluten free!

 

I will come back and post what the GI says and if my husband or I or both of us are Celiac or not. I also plan on trying to keep track of the things I notice in both my Celiac child and the older two that "aren't".

 

 

My kids all tested negative in the tTG IgA test in spite of the fact that 2/3 of them had some obvious symptoms of celiac or NCGI. Since that was the only test my GP would do, I made our household gluten-free and lo and behold the kids got better. What a "coincidence" eh?  LOL My doctor advised not making them gluten-free but it doesn't hurt them in any, and it appears to help.

 

During the teenage years, many celiacs lose some of their symptoms. I know mine became much less noticeable at that time. It's good that you are checking them. If all tests are negative, you should retest every few years because celiac can appear at any time in those with a family history... and those without.

 

Best wishes.

mommy2krj Explorer

My kids all tested negative in the tTG IgA test in spite of the fact that 2/3 of them had some obvious symptoms of celiac or NCGI. Since that was the only test my GP would do, I made our household gluten-free and lo and behold the kids got better. What a "coincidence" eh?  LOL My doctor advised not making them gluten-free but it doesn't hurt them in any, and it appears to help.

 

During the teenage years, many celiacs lose some of their symptoms. I know mine became much less noticeable at that time. It's good that you are checking them. If all tests are negative, you should retest every few years because celiac can appear at any time in those with a family history... and those without.

 

Best wishes.

Thanks for the well wishes! :)

I still don't understand why a doctor would advise against people going gluten free (unless there is an ongoing problem and they're trying to test for it). So long as the people going gluten free are doing a whole foods way of doing it and not just swapping out junk for junk. I don't think many doctors really have a clue when it comes to nutrition and such.

Anyway...I'm bringing those results with me to the GI so she can tell me they are negative. I don't trust that the pediatrician truly knows anything about it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.