Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Is Normal For First Ttg Antibody Check?


designerstubble

Recommended Posts

designerstubble Enthusiast

Hello

 

Had my blood taken 2 weeks ago, first tTg antibody test done since diagnosis last October. Normal protocol  here in UK is they write to you to let you know the outcome if everything is OK, but I have just received a letter with a new appt for my blood results. Doesn't bode well.

 

The main problem I have is that when they diagnosed me, the labs didn't supply an antibody level, just a Yes/Positive response, so I have no idea what my antibodies were at time of diagnosis.

 

I presented with classic symptoms, diarrhea, bloating, weightloss, pain, severe anaemia, low vit d etc, so I reckon I probably was at a high level of antibody at diagnosis.

 

I'm a stress head. I'm having lots of other problems going on at the moment (health related, heart, allergy, skin, also continued diarrhea)... I REALLY don't want to spend the next two weeks worrying about this too... Really struggling at moment.

 

I obviously appreciate that everyone is different and there is no rule, but I just want an idea of what I could expect numbers to be at given that I have been REALLY strict, and gluten-free 8 months...

 

I know labs in UK might have different ranges here, if 300+ is maximum, would I be expecting a drop to 250 in 8 months, or 100?? Or should I expect to show an almost full recovery?? Again, I know there are no givens, just looking for an idea, don't want to freak.

 

Appreciate any help or guidance


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

Good Morning!!!

 

Do you have the new tTG result in a number value with range?  Did they run only the tTG during this recent test?

 

I have seen it take some time to get the antibodies all the way back to normal range -- as you mention the most frustrating part is you don't know your starting number for comparison.

 

Given you have been strictly gluten-free for many months and you have had some health improvements that your starting number was quite high and thus has improved.  As I have know way of knowing for sure I suggest you do your best to hang tough, eat clean and re-test at three month intervals until your antibodies are all playing nice.

nvsmom Community Regular

I agree with with Lisa, if you hav had health improvements, and your numbers have gone in a downward direction, then you are probably doing well. retesting will help prove that.

 

My tTG Iga went from >200 to 34 (reference range 0-20) in one year gluten-free. I think that's slower than many but it is getting there. I also have a thyroiditis and that could help keep my number elevated. On the other hand, my EMA IgA went from positive 1:40 to negative; since the EMA is thought to show advanced villi damage, I'm happy with that.

designerstubble Enthusiast

Thanks for that girls :)

 

Am just going to post some results I received on a thread... Maybe you could help?? Doctor couldn't tell me anything??? Alas I am doomed with these doctors. But, maybe someone on here can??

 

Thanks for all you advice, hopefully someone can tell me what it all means.

 

And hopefully, it's good or ok news, can't cope with more crap!!

 

Thanks again 8D

designerstubble Enthusiast

Ok, I've just learnt for myself that it isnt good news :(

It seems my levels are still very high after 8 months. I'm so upset, can't believe it. I am as gluten free as I can be. The only gluten in my house is my husbands beer, but he knows that i won't go near him if he's drinking it, we don't even kiss through my own paranoia.

 

I don't know what else to do?? What do you do if your levels are high??

 

Btw they were:

Anti-tissue transglutaminase level 1.2 u/ml (0-10)-Tissue transglutaminase equivocal range = 7-10u/ml

 

Seems as my readings are pretty stellar. What do you do in this situation?? Is this more indicative of refractory?? Since I'm still passing loose bowel movements (and undigested food sometimes)...

 

I guess that's why they are calling me in. To tell me how I have been non compliant. Even though I couldn't be more gluten free if I tried.

 

Its devastating after all the hard work, it really is. :(

GottaSki Mentor

Ok, I've just learnt for myself that it isnt good news :(

It seems my levels are still very high after 8 months. I'm so upset, can't believe it. I am as gluten free as I can be. The only gluten in my house is my husbands beer, but he knows that i won't go near him if he's drinking it, we don't even kiss through my own paranoia.

 

I don't know what else to do?? What do you do if your levels are high??

 

Btw they were:

Anti-tissue transglutaminase level 1.2 u/ml (0-10)-Tissue transglutaminase equivocal range = 7-10u/ml

 

Seems as my readings are pretty stellar. What do you do in this situation?? Is this more indicative of refractory?? Since I'm still passing loose bowel movements (and undigested food sometimes)...

 

I guess that's why they are calling me in. To tell me how I have been non compliant. Even though I couldn't be more gluten free if I tried.

 

Its devastating after all the hard work, it really is. :(

 

I don't understand the results as you typed them.  I think it says you tested at 1.2 and normal range is (0-10).  If this is the case you are not high at all.  Sorry if I am not understanding your results.

 

Edited to add...way too early in the game to start thinking refractory -- IMO -- you have had improvement in some symptoms -- healing can take longer than 8 months.

designerstubble Enthusiast

I don't understand the results as you typed them.  I think it says you tested at 1.2 and normal range is (0-10).  If this is the case you are not high at all.  Sorry if I am not understanding your results.

 

Edited to add...way too early in the game to start thinking refractory -- IMO -- you have had improvement in some symptoms -- healing can take longer than 8 months.

I'm confused. I typed them exactly as they appeared on my lab report. I thought the same as you to start with and I was elated. Then I researched and found out that 7-10 u/mL is a high reading. Unless thats a reference for labs.

 

I don't understand why it says 'Anti-tissue transglutaminase ' and then under result it says' tissue transglutaminase'??? 

 

I read it to mean my Anti-tissue transglutaminase is 1.2 and my tissue transglutaminase is 7-10. Am I being a total idiot?? I SO hope so, right now I'd LOVE to be a complete and utter silly *expletive!* that has gotten her knickers in a twist! 

 

Thanks for responding I do really appreciate it, and I know you are right about refractory. I think my adrenals are way off lately and I just can't cope with the scares anymore, I get straight into my tunnel of doom. 

 

You know, I'd just like a few months of getting on with it instead of, "here's another health problem this month, and oh, would you like another, yes, have some heart trouble while you're there too, lets send you to the dermatoligist, and don't forget the allergy clinic for your 40 intolerances!). 

 

And relax!

Lisa, as always, apologies for the rant (bad day!), and THANK YOU for being there as usual. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



designerstubble Enthusiast

For your ref I'm typing EXACTLY as it appears:

 

Code                                                           Result

Anti tissue transgluaminase level                 1.2u/mL (1-10)-Tissue transglutaminase equivocal range =7-10u/mL

 

 

Is it just telling me what the equivocal range is? OR is it telling me my Tissue transglutaminase is in the equivocal range??

 

Whats the diff between Anti-tissue transglutaminase and Tissue transglutaminase levels?

 

Thanks again for ALL your help ;) you cheered me up btw, thanks, feel better

GottaSki Mentor

They mean the same thing...but this is strange wording.  I still think your result is 1.2 with "normal" range being 0-10 and that you are well within normal -- perhaps your doc has a copy of your original antibody test in your file with the exact numbers on which tests -- positive is positive...but it sure does help to know how much it has lowered after over six months gluten-free!!!

 

Hang in there and you never bother me....I've been in your shoes -- hope they are cute today ;)

nvsmom Community Regular

My interpretation is the same as Lisa's. To me, it looks like your normal now.... But I don't speak "medical-ese". That wording is really strange.

designerstubble Enthusiast

Thanks Lisa

My docs are completely useless and I have to fight them for copies of any bloods. (They think I'm a trouble maker for even asking questions).

I'm starting to think you are right you know, that my numbers are low and within normal range. I know it's not as good as being told the biopsies are normal but it's a bloody good place to start! In fact it makes me very happy! Just knowing that I'm doing something right, and it's one less thing to worry about with my health!!

I've been reading that ttg is actually a measure of gut damage? Is that right? I thought it was a measure of antibodies! I'm so naive still.

Thanks Lisa, my shoes are SO cute today!! Hugs

Kamma Explorer

Morning, Designer Stubble...

 

Tissue Transglutaminase (ttg) is actually an enzyme contained in your body that cross links with the gluten proteins in wheat, rye and barley stimulating the immune system to respond with B Cells (White Blood Cells) to produce the Anti transglutaminase antibodies IgA and IgG to go on the attack.

 

I'm reading your results as the normal range is 1 - 10 and the equivocal range (antibodies are present but not enough to confirm celiac disease causing an inconclusive test result) is 7 - 10.  Anything above 10 would be confirmation of celiac disease or not responding to the diet.

 

Kind regards,

Kamma

  • 3 weeks later...
designerstubble Enthusiast

Thanks Kamma! Sorry, only just seen this, been a manic month, not been able to get my fix on these forums!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.