Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing In Canada


Porcelina

Recommended Posts

Porcelina Contributor

Hey Canucks.  If your blood test comes back positive, is there any good reason to go get the endoscopy done.  If I read this right, Americans can have insurance claims with regards to the disease ONLY if they have the scopy done, and some countries will not draft you into the army, but again, ONLY if the endoscopy is done.

 

I just had the blood work done and won't know my results for 1-2 weeks.  If I can stop eating gluten now, I would LOVE to, but if I have to continue for an endoscopy, I'll keep up with the challenge.

 

Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

I think it depend son you and your doctor whether you go ahead with the endoscopy. I personally skipped it because the blood tests agreed with my symptoms, and my doctor didn't push for it either. Specialists (GI or other) tend to push for further testing, in my experience, but if you feel satisfied with a diagnosis of celiac disease with just blood tests, there isn't a lot of reason to keep testing.

 

Also, in my province (Alberta) the wait to see a GI for celiac is almost a year... not much point in it by then.

 

Some feel it is a good idea to do the endoscopy to get an actual visual of the damage done to the intestines because if symptoms don't improve on the gluten-free diet and they need to re-scope, then they'll have something to compare back to. It's a good point, but I personally felt if I still had symptoms after going gluten-free, then the scope would still be useful if I had it done while gluten-free - it would show if later symptoms were from celiac damage or not.

 

Of course, if you want to claim gluten-free foods as an expense on your taxes, you will need a firm diagnosis from your doctor, and some may not give one without an endoscopy. ... I have heard those who claim gluten-free food tend to get audited at a higher rate though so I'm not sure it's worth it.

love2travel Mentor

Another Albertan here!  I did get scoped because I did not believe the positive bloodwork (talk about denial!) and wanted to prove that I did not have celiac.  Gluten never gave me obvious symptoms (at the time).  As a serious food person I refused to have celiac.  Weird, I know, but true.  So, when my doctor told me to go back to eating gluten for the scope I was thrilled.  As mentioned above, it can take a year to see a GI doctor but I was bumped by some miracle to four months.  So, I binged on all the gluten I could in four months.  Frankly, I really enjoyed myself.  Little did I know the serious damage I could have done/did.

 

My biopsies came back positive and that finally convinced me.  From that day until now (2.5 years) I have been strictly gluten free (with about three unintentional glutenings).  In retrospect, celiac eventually made sense.  It explained my miscarriages, my poor tooth enamel, etc. 

 

My reasons were:

 

1.  Ironically, to prove I did not have celiac

2.  The surgeon wanted to rule out other possible problems

 

I am very glad to have had the biopsies done.  A few of my family members have celiac I am convinced (though they are in even worse denial than I and refuse testing).  In their eyes there is a huge difference between celiacs and those with "only" gluten intolerance so I suppose I am more "legitimate".

 

We all have our reasons for and against.  If I felt ill as so many do on the gluten challenge, my response may have been different.  But not likely - I am one of those "need to know" people.

nvsmom Community Regular

I was a "need to know"er for the blood tests - I'm not sure I could have, or would have, gone gluten free if I did not have the positive blood work. I was pretty used to stomach aches and such so I saw no real reason to change; I thought "it is what it is"... Pretty lame, eh?  LOL

 

Most people who had a positive biopsy seem to say that it was worth it. The only people I remember not appreciating the biopsy are those few celiacs who have positive test results but a negative biopsy - for them it confuses the matter.... That is by far the minority though.

 

love2travel - that picture in your avatar has my mouth watering!

Porcelina Contributor

Thanks for the replies. No one in my family has been tested for celiac, just me and thats because of my "ibs", stomach aches and fatigue amongst other symptoms made me decide to finaly get tested. If the tests come back negative, i know enough from a previous year of being gluten free that i feel so much better that i feel like a biopsy doesnt matter to me. I just dont want to go gluten-free again, only to find that i bave to have a biopsy for some specific reason, thus having me do the gluten challenge all over again.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      5

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      5

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

    3. - Scott Adams replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      5

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

    4. - Jmartes71 replied to chrish42's topic in Doctors
      7

      Doctors and Celiac.com

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      5

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,270
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dwellz
    Newest Member
    Dwellz
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Please read the original post--they are looking for a gluten and milk-free treat to replace Tootsie Rolls for their child who loves Tootsie Rolls, but can no longer have them due to a dairy issue--they are not looking for M&M's.
    • Wheatwacked
      They both do.  The peanuts add nutrients to the treat. Tootsie Roll: Sugar, Corn Syrup, Palm Oil, Condensed Skim Milk, Cocoa, Whey, Soy Lecithin, Artificial and Natural Flavors. M&M Peanut: milk chocolate (sugar, chocolate, skim milk, cocoa butter, lactose, milkfat, peanuts, soy lecithin, salt, natural flavor), peanuts, sugar, cornstarch; less than 1% of: palm oil, corn syrup, dextrin, colors (includes blue 2 lake, blue 1 lake, red 40, yellow 6 lake, yellow 5, yellow 6, blue 1, yelskim milk contains caseinlow 5 lake, blue 2, red 40 lake), carnauba wax, gum acacia. glycemic index of Tootsie Rolls ~83 gycemic index of M&M Peanuts ~33   The composition of non-fat solids of skim milk is: 52.15% lactose, 38.71% protein (31.18% casein, 7.53% whey protein), 1.08% fat, and 8.06% ash.   https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118810279.ch04  Milkfat carries the fat soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K. The solids-not-fat portion [of milk] consists of protein (primarily casein and lactalbumin), carbohydrates (primarily lactose), and minerals (including calcium and phosphorus). https://ansc.umd.edu/sites/ansc.umd.edu/files/files/documents/Extension/Milk-Definitions.pdf
    • Scott Adams
      But M&M's contain milk, and would not be at all like a Tootsie Roll.
    • Jmartes71
      I appreciate you validating me because medical is an issue and it's not ok at all they they do this. Some days I just want to call the news media and just call out these doctors especially when they are supposed to be specialist Downplaying when gluten-free when they should know gluten-free is false negative. Now dealing with other issues and still crickets for disability because I show no signs of celiac BECAUSE IM GLUTENFREE! Actively dealing with sibo and skin issues.Depression is the key because thats all they know, im depressed because medical has caused it because of my celiac and related issues. I should have never ever been employed as a bus driver.After 3 years still healing and ZERO income desperately trying to get better but no careteam for celiac other than stay away frim wheat! Now im having care because my head is affected either ms or meningioma in go in tomorrow again for more scans.I know im slowly dying and im looking like a disability chaser
    • Wheatwacked
      M&M Peanuts. About the same calories and sugar while M&M Peanuts have fiber, potassium, iron and protein that Tootsie Rolls ("We are currently producing more than 50 million Tootsie Rolls each day.") don't. Click the links to compare nutritional values.  Both are made with sugar, not high fructose corn syrup.  I use them as a gluten free substitute for a peanut butter sandwich.  Try her on grass fed, pasture fed milk. While I get heartburn at night from commercial dairy milk, I do not from 'grassmilk'.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.