Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Tomorrow/ Lab Questions


Lisalee1211

Recommended Posts

Lisalee1211 Newbie

Well, I have my biopsy tomorrow.

I hope this gives me answers. I'm still reading and learning about blood test results.

If anyone can understand this and could help me I would appreciate it.

My blood test shows my Iga was a 1. < 4 is normal.

My Ttg was a 12.. <6 is normal

Where I got these labs the told me it was celiac. I'm still questioning the results.

I talked to my GI And told him about the labs. So I'm getting the biopsy done.

I decided to do the biopsy because of all the symthoms I have lived with basically my whole life. They have only gotten worse now.

I guess now I just wait and hope for answers.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Tomorrow?  Great.  :)  I hope the results are very clear cut for you.

 

A weakly positive tTG IgA can be caused by colitis, crohn's, diabetes, thyroiditis, chronic liver disease, and a serious infection  BUT your test result was not weakly positive. :( You were double the normal upper limit whereas I would consider a weak positive to be a 6.5 or 7 something - not 12.

 

A (total serum) IgA test is not a celiac test. The IgA is actually a control test to make sure that you make enough IgA to make the IgA based celiac tests (like the tTG IgA, DGP IgA and EMA IgA) accurate. About 1/20 celiacs are IgA deficient so their celiac IgA based tests (tTG IgA, etc) would be falsely negative.  Your IgA was fine (if a tad on the low side of normal) so your tTG IgA should be accurate (if possibly a tiny bit lower than could have been if you had a higher IgA).

 

Remember to request a minimum of 6 biopsies in your small intestine before the endoscopy. Celiac damage can be patchy so you are less likely to get a false negative biopsy if the doctor takes a bunch of samples.

 

Best of luck tomorrow!  :) Let us know how it goes.

Lisalee1211 Newbie

Tomorrow?  Great.  :)  I hope the results are very clear cut for you.

 

A weakly positive tTG IgA can be caused by colitis, crohn's, diabetes, thyroiditis, chronic liver disease, and a serious infection  BUT your test result was not weakly positive. :( You were double the normal upper limit whereas I would consider a weak positive to be a 6.5 or 7 something - not 12.

 

A (total serum) IgA test is not a celiac test. The IgA is actually a control test to make sure that you make enough IgA to make the IgA based celiac tests (like the tTG IgA, DGP IgA and EMA IgA) accurate. About 1/20 celiacs are IgA deficient so their celiac IgA based tests (tTG IgA, etc) would be falsely negative.  Your IgA was fine (if a tad on the low side of normal) so your tTG IgA should be accurate (if possibly a tiny bit lower than could have been if you had a higher IgA).

 

Remember to request a minimum of 6 biopsies in your small intestine before the endoscopy. Celiac damage can be patchy so you are less likely to get a false negative biopsy if the doctor takes a bunch of samples.

 

Best of luck tomorrow!  :) Let us know how it goes.

Nicole,

Thanks so much for your input. I will let you know how it goes!!

GottaSki Mentor

Hiya LisaLee!

It looks like docs may have only run:

Total Serum IgA

tTG-IgA

If so...please request a full celiac antibody panel tomorrow.

Balance of tests:

tTG-IgG

EMA-IgA

DGP-IgA

DGP-IgG

good luck and do let us know how you fare :)

Oh...have whomever is with you ask the doctor to tell them what he/she saw...often these verbal descriptions provide more information than the procedural report....which you should ask for a written copy of...along with the pathology report.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,076
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.