Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Looks like Celiac, but no definitive test result (4 yo)


ravenu5

Recommended Posts

ravenu5 Rookie

My 4 yo son has had iron issues since he was 1.  At 2 he had upper and lower scopes done, both didn't show anything abnormal.  Treatment for his iron has been to increase his iron supplement every time it falls.  We increase, he levels out ok, after 3-4 months it tanks again, up the amount of supplement, 3-4 months go by..... He is up to 75mg of iron supplement daily now.  They checked his vitamin D levels at the end of June and the ref range is 30-100 and he was at 31.  His last iron checks at that time were 

Component Your Value Standard Range
Iron 22 ug/dL 50-120 ug/dL
Transferrin 196 mg/dL 200-400 mg/dL
Total Iron Binding Cap 245 ug/dL 250-450 ug/dL
% Saturation 9 % 20-55 %

 

We did a repeat upper/lower scope.  Showed nothing more than a little irritation in the upper scope, but not enough to explain the anemia.  

We have ran Celiac panels

IgA on 4/7 was 31 and on 6/24 was 49 (ref range 25-160)

Ttg IgA on 4/7 was 1 and on 6/24 was 10 (ref range >20 mile positive)

I was diagnosed with Celiac in May so we ran the HLA typing

HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05/DQB1*02). Positive    
HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03/DQB1*0302) Negative    
HLA-DQA1 1    
HLA-DQA1 5    
HLA-DQB1 201    
HLA-DQB1 602  

 

Because his scopes, and Iga/Ttg all are negative they won't diagnose as Celiac of course.  We have an appt with hematology at the end of November.  However, since he has low vitamin levels as well it seems more "gut" related, not blood related.  His primary dr. still feels like it is likely Celiac and he could have small intestinal damage that just isn't visible on scopes.  She wants to have him go gluten-free for 6 months, recheck all his labs for iron/vitamins and see if there are improvements.   If so, then put him BACK on gluten for 3 months and repeat all the Celiac labs.  

Has anyone had a similarly traveled road with their little one in the process of getting a diagnosis? Have you found in your experience that they don't always show on scopes or labs until they get older? Any thoughts on perhaps taking him off gluten for so long, if then perhaps when he goes back on it might increase his lab values? Kind of like a shock to the system kind of thing? I hate to get him off gluten, find it clears up all the issues then have to put him back on, but I also am very familiar with the school system and doctors and know that a formal diagnosis should be done.  

I appreciate any thoughts! 

Thanks! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
37 minutes ago, ravenu5 said:

My 4 yo son has had iron issues since he was 1.  At 2 he had upper and lower scopes done, both didn't show anything abnormal.  Treatment for his iron has been to increase his iron supplement every time it falls.  We increase, he levels out ok, after 3-4 months it tanks again, up the amount of supplement, 3-4 months go by..... He is up to 75mg of iron supplement daily now.  They checked his vitamin D levels at the end of June and the ref range is 30-100 and he was at 31.  His last iron checks at that time were 

Component Your Value Standard Range
Iron 22 ug/dL 50-120 ug/dL
Transferrin 196 mg/dL 200-400 mg/dL
Total Iron Binding Cap 245 ug/dL 250-450 ug/dL
% Saturation 9 % 20-55 %

 

We did a repeat upper/lower scope.  Showed nothing more than a little irritation in the upper scope, but not enough to explain the anemia.  

We have ran Celiac panels

IgA on 4/7 was 31 and on 6/24 was 49 (ref range 25-160)

Ttg IgA on 4/7 was 1 and on 6/24 was 10 (ref range >20 mile positive)

I was diagnosed with Celiac in May so we ran the HLA typing

HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05/DQB1*02). Positive    
HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03/DQB1*0302) Negative    
HLA-DQA1 1    
HLA-DQA1 5    
HLA-DQB1 201    
HLA-DQB1 602  

 

Because his scopes, and Iga/Ttg all are negative they won't diagnose as Celiac of course.  We have an appt with hematology at the end of November.  However, since he has low vitamin levels as well it seems more "gut" related, not blood related.  His primary dr. still feels like it is likely Celiac and he could have small intestinal damage that just isn't visible on scopes.  She wants to have him go gluten-free for 6 months, recheck all his labs for iron/vitamins and see if there are improvements.   If so, then put him BACK on gluten for 3 months and repeat all the Celiac labs.  

Has anyone had a similarly traveled road with their little one in the process of getting a diagnosis? Have you found in your experience that they don't always show on scopes or labs until they get older? Any thoughts on perhaps taking him off gluten for so long, if then perhaps when he goes back on it might increase his lab values? Kind of like a shock to the system kind of thing? I hate to get him off gluten, find it clears up all the issues then have to put him back on, but I also am very familiar with the school system and doctors and know that a formal diagnosis should be done.  

I appreciate any thoughts! 

Thanks! 

So, why didn't they run the full celiac panel?  Studies have shown that smaller kids can often test positive to the DGP tests vs. the TTG (Google it because I've got to get my kid off to school in a few minutes! :))  Not to mention, that I test (even in follow-up tests) negative to the TTG tests, yet my biopsies revealed a Marsh Stage IIIB which is moderate to severe and anemia was my main symptom).    Ask for the complete panel, including the EMA.  

Also, is he gluten light?  My kid is.  She is not celiac, but we maintain a gluten-free household.  I try to give her pre-packaged foods for her school lunch, but when I preparing her for the entire celiac panel, I make sure she's consuming gluten daily for three months. 

Finally, no visible damage.  I had none.  None.  The damage to the villi is microscopic and that's why four to six biopsies are taken.  

Are you sure your GI knows what she is doing?  Why isn't she following the algorithm for diagnosing celiac patients (especially for peds)  and keeping up on current celiac research?  

ravenu5 Rookie

Sorry, I should have specified that the biopsies from his upper/lower scope didn't show anything ;)  Aside from some minor inflammation.  

I am also about to head out the door but will definitely look up the DGP test! I haven't heard of that one! His primary dr is all about ordering what ever tests we need to.  She wasn't familiar with the HLA testing but upon my request looked over what the test was for (keeping Celiac on the table or taking it off) and she ordered it.  I'll take a closer look at the DGP for sure! The EMA he did have done 2 years ago which came back negative.  Perhaps I'll ask for a repeat of that too. 

We honestly don't like his GI dr.  We didn't really care for her 2 years ago the first time he had scopes done, but with going down the GI road again 2 years later after no improvement with his iron, they scheduled it as a follow up with the same dr.  Or it was wait 3+ months for a new dr.  

We have a feeling hematology will kick us back to GI as we really don't think its a blood issue.  If so I do plan to see if we can see a different GI dr.  His current GI dr really seems to be anti-Celiac diagnosis for what ever reason. 

He eats full gluten at the moment.  I'm the only Celiac in the family at the moment so hubby and the 3 boys are all still on gluten.  He will switch to my side of the pantry when we take him gluten-free to see if it makes a difference. 

Thanks for the input and I'll do some more researching! 

frieze Community Regular

ask your ped if they would give the dx with the improvement with dietary intervention alone, after all, years ago,, that WAS the test, lol.

Fundog Enthusiast

What other tests has the hematologist done?  How are his other blood values (mcv, cbc, leukocytes, neutrocytes, platelets, etc?)

ravenu5 Rookie
23 hours ago, frieze said:

ask your ped if they would give the dx with the improvement with dietary intervention alone, after all, years ago,, that WAS the test, lol.

I was thinking about this!!! But we are military and I worry that when we move, whoever the new doctor is would think it wasn't accurate and probably still require trial/testing anyway :/ 

ravenu5 Rookie
9 hours ago, Fundog said:

What other tests has the hematologist done?  How are his other blood values (mcv, cbc, leukocytes, neutrocytes, platelets, etc?)

His hematology appt actually isn't until the end of Nov.  His platelet count indicates the anemia though his hemoglobin is slower to lower.  Nothing out of range except for the platelet counts. 

Though his last CBC w/diff and CBC w/out diff

Component Your Value Standard Range
White Blood Cell Count 8.11 K/cu mm 5.50-15.50 K/cu mm
Red Blood Cell Count 4.49 M/cu mm 3.90-5.30 M/cu mm
Hemoglobin 12.2 g/dL 11.7-13.8 g/dL
Hematocrit 37.3 % 34.0-40.0 %
Mean Corpuscular Volume 83.1 fL 75.0-87.0 fL
Mean Corpus Hgb 27.2 pg 24.0-30.0 pg
Mean Corpus Hgb Conc 32.7 g/dL 31.0-37.0 g/dL
RBC Distribution Width 13.0 % 11.5-14.5 %
Platelet Count 406 K/cu mm 150-350 K/cu mm
Mean Platelet Volume 9.2 fL 9.2-12.7 fL
Nucleated RBC Number 0.00 K/cu mm 0.00-0.01 K/cu mm

This was his last CBC w/out diff but it was a couple weeks after his last iron increase so the new dose of iron was starting to help. 

Component Results

Component Your Value Standard Range
White Blood Cell Count 9.39 K/cu mm 5.50-15.50 K/cu mm
Red Blood Cell Count 4.39 M/cu mm 3.90-5.30 M/cu mm
Hemoglobin 12.2 g/dL 11.7-13.8 g/dL
Hematocrit 37.1 % 34.0-40.0 %
Mean Corpuscular Volume 84.5 fL 75.0-87.0 fL
Mean Corpus Hgb 27.8 pg 24.0-30.0 pg
Mean Corpus Hgb Conc 32.9 g/dL 31.0-37.0 g/dL
RBC Distribution Width 13.3 % 11.5-14.5 %
Platelet Count 358 K/cu mm 150-350 K/cu mm
Mean Platelet Volume 9.4 fL 9.2-12.7 fL
Nucleated RBC Number 0.00 K/cu mm 0.00-0.01 K/cu mm
Neutrophil % 54.4 % 27.0-55.0 %
Lymphocytes % 34.1 % 30.0-65.0 %
Monocyte % 8.8 % 3.0-9.0 %
Eosinophil % 2.0 % 1.0-4.0 %
Basophil % 0.5 % 0.0-2.0 %
Immature Gran % 0.2 % 0.0-1.0 %
Immature Grans = Promyelocytes + Myleocytes + Metamyelocytes
ANC-Neutrophil Absolute 5.10 K/cu mm 1.50-8.50 K/cu mm
Lymphcytes Absolute 3.20 K/cu mm 1.30-10.10 K/cu mm
Monocyte Absolute 0.83 K/cu mm 0.20-1.40 K/cu mm
Eosinophil Absolute 0.19 K/cu mm 0.12-0.30 K/cu mm
Immature Granulocytes Abs 0.02 K/cu mm 0.00-0.05 K/cu mm
Immature Grans = Promyelocytes + Myleocytes + Metamyelocytes

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    3. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    4. - Mari replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      18

      My only proof

    5. - Ginger38 replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,472
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kygirlsusan
    Newest Member
    kygirlsusan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
    • Ginger38
      It has been the most terrible illness ever! Going on 3 weeks now… I had chicken pox as a kid… crazy how much havoc this dormant virus has caused after being reactivated! No idea what even caused it to fire back up. I’m scared this pain and sensitivity is just never going to improve or go away 
    • Mari
      OKJmartes. Skin and eyes. Also anxiety and frustration. I have read that Celiacs have more skin problems than people who do not have Celiacs. I take increased levels of Vit. D3, very high levels of B12 and an eating part of an avocado every day. KnittyKitty and others here can add what they take for skin health. A Dermatologist might identify the type of skin condition. By eyes you may mean eyesight problems not just irritated, red eyes. It is not very difficult to get a diagnosis of which eye condition is affecting your vision but much more difficult to find an effective remedy. The ophthalmologists I have seen have been only a little helpful. There seems to have been some advances in eye treatments that most of them are completely ignorant of or just won't add to their treatment plans.  Forcertain you may as well buy some remedy from a facebook ad but that is obviously risky and may actually damafe your eyes. However it is known that certain supplements , taken at the effectivelevels do help with eyesight. Two of them are Luten and zanthamin (spelling?)and certain anti-oxidants such as bilberry..    Hope this helps.
    • Ginger38
      I refused to do the gluten challenge for a long time because I knew how sick I would be: I have always had and still have positive antibodies and have so many symptoms my  GI was 💯 sure I would have a positive biopsy. I didn’t want to make myself sick to get a negative biopsy and be more confused by all this.  He couldn’t guarantee me a negative biopsy meant no celiac bc there may not be damage yet or it’s possible to miss biopsies where there’s damage but he was so sure and convinced me I needed that biopsy I went back on gluten. It was a terrible experience! I took pictures of the bloating and swelling and weight gain during the challenge. I gained 9 pounds, looked pregnant, was in pain , couldn’t work or function without long naps and the brain fog was debilitating. And in the end he didn’t get a positive biopsy… so I wish I had never wasted my time or health going through it. I haven’t been truly straightened  out since and I am currently battling a shingles infection at 43 and I can’t help but wonder if the stress I put my body under to try and get an official diagnosis has caused all this. Best of luck to you - whatever you decide. It’s not a fun thing to go through and I still don’t have the answers I was looking for 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.