Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused by my blood work results

kg51

Recommended Posts

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted

32F with a lifetime of various digestive upsets, but nothing that's ever been super severe, and nothing that's been consistent throughout. I had a panel done through my primary care doctor and the results popped up in my online account. While I wait to hear back from her (though I'm a little doubtful of her knowledge and will follow up with a GI regardless)...

Immunoglobin A: 216 (range 70-312)

Gliad (Deanidated) Ab IgG: negative

Gliad Deanidated) Ab IgA: negative

Endomysial Antibody IgA by IF: negative <1:10 (range <1:10)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA: 19.8 (range <15)

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Qualitative: positive

So I understand that testing the immunoglobin A is to make sure it's normal to rule out the potential for false negatives. Then IgG and IgA and Endomysial Antibody are all negative, but the Tissue Transglutaminase is positive.

Is 19.8 "low positive?" Why are the others negative? Is this still possible/probably celiac disease? 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted
1 hour ago, kg51 said:

32F with a lifetime of various digestive upsets, but nothing that's ever been super severe, and nothing that's been consistent throughout. I had a panel done through my primary care doctor and the results popped up in my online account. While I wait to hear back from her (though I'm a little doubtful of her knowledge and will follow up with a GI regardless)...

Immunoglobin A: 216 (range 70-312)

Gliad (Deanidated) Ab IgG: negative

Gliad Deanidated) Ab IgA: negative

Endomysial Antibody IgA by IF: negative <1:10 (range <1:10)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA: 19.8 (range <15)

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Qualitative: positive

So I understand that testing the immunoglobin A is to make sure it's normal to rule out the potential for false negatives. Then IgG and IgA and Endomysial Antibody are all negative, but the Tissue Transglutaminase is positive.

Is 19.8 "low positive?" Why are the others negative? Is this still possible/probably celiac disease? 

Welcome!  

Yes!  Ask for a Gastroenterologist (GI) referral.  A positive on the TTG that is slightly elevated could be celiac disease or another autoimmune disorder.    The blood test is just the first step in the diagnostic process.  Keep consuming gluten until you see a  GI.  Do not think that a slight elevation or “slightly moderate” equates to no intestinal damage.  

The other tests are negative because they are not all are 100% perfect.      I tested positive to only the DGP IgA and my GI labeled me as slightly positive, yet I had moderate to severe patches of intestinal damage.  

 

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author

Is there a Tissue Transglutaminase range for celiac-positive people? Is my 19.8 considered low?

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author

With a positive Tissue Transglutaminase now, even if a future biopsy were negative, is a gluten-free diet recommended? Goodness, I can't wait to talk to my doctor.

Before40 Newbie
Before40
Posted

Been through hell myself with all this. I went to so many doctors, specialists, etc. I recently found this place and have actually started getting answers. www.lab600.com I just posted in the forum a few minutes ago. Definetly worth checking out.

GFinDC Veteran
GFinDC
Posted
1 hour ago, Before40 said:

Been through hell myself with all this. I went to so many doctors, specialists, etc. I recently found this place and have actually started getting answers. www.lab600.com I just posted in the forum a few minutes ago. Definetly worth checking out.

A hair sample can't diagnose celiac disease.  The correct testing includes both blood antibodies and a biopsy via an endoscopy. 

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted
On 4/3/2018 at 11:33 AM, kg51 said:

Is there a Tissue Transglutaminase range for celiac-positive people? Is my 19.8 considered low?

It doesn't work that way. Different labs have different reference ranges so one can't judge anything by saying 19.8. That's why we always ask people to list the reference ranges from their paperwork which you did so we didn't have to ask you.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted
On 4/3/2018 at 11:38 AM, kg51 said:

With a positive Tissue Transglutaminase now, even if a future biopsy were negative, is a gluten-free diet recommended? Goodness, I can't wait to talk to my doctor.

The gold standard for diagnosis is positive blood work combined with positive endoscopic biopsy. Why the biopsy? Because the TtG IgA alone could possibly be indicative of some other AI disease going on such as Chron's. Therefore, in your case, it's best to do the endoscopy & find out if anything else is going on in there -- maybe several things are, maybe not but better to know. Right? After that, then you can consider giving the gluten-free diet a good try if the biopsies are negative for celiac. 

I am going to repeat this b/c it bears repeating. This is VERY important!!!!

CONTINUE TO EAT GLUTEN EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE ENDOSCOPY HAS BEEN DONE.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted
On 4/3/2018 at 8:38 AM, kg51 said:

With a positive Tissue Transglutaminase now, even if a future biopsy were negative, is a gluten-free diet recommended? Goodness, I can't wait to talk to my doctor.

Yes, a gluten free diet could be recommended but only after your GI has completed all testing (including the endoscopy).  Why?  Because your GI could miss damaged areas in the small damage as celiac disease can be patchy.  The small intestine is the size of a tennis court when stretched out.  

Squirmingitches comments are spot on, but I think she missed the range.  Your result was a 19 and the cutoff was 15.  Not a super positive, but it is a positive.  You do not know until you have the endoscopy as celiac antibodies elevations do not always correlate with intestinal damage.   

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author
4 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

It doesn't work that way. Different labs have different reference ranges so one can't judge anything by saying 19.8. That's why we always ask people to list the reference ranges from their paperwork which you did so we didn't have to ask you.

I posted the range, it's <15 u/ml.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

I said you posted the range so we didn't have to ask you. 

Maybe I need to clarify. IF a person came on here & said they tested @ 19.8 & gave no other information then we would have no clue as to whether that was positive or negative. 

OK, maybe you're still asking if the 19.8 is considered low. It's not a matter of it being low as long as it's positive which it is. A positive is a positive is a positive. Don't let a doctor trip you up by saying it's a low positive therefore doesn't mean anything. The only time the actual # means something is if it's off the charts high. Like 100 would be considered off the charts high for a range of <15 or 89 would be off the charts high but normally you don't look at how close to the positive range you tested. If your result was 16, it would STILL be positive & trigger moving to an endoscopic biopsy. 

If I didn't explain that well enough then don't hesitate to ask for clarification.

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author

That was helpful, thank you for your further clarification on your previous comment. I wasn't sure if "a positive is a positive" or not or if a value's closeness to the range mattered.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

Good, I'm glad I managed to explain that clearly this time. I knew what I meant before but I certainly didn't make it too clear otherwise -- totally hashed it!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,015
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Rockette47
    Newest Member
    Rockette47
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      Fighting for a name

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      Im so frustrated and still getting the run around trying to reprove my celiac disease which my past primary ignored for 25 years.I understand that theres a ray of medical that doctors are limited too but not listening and telling the patient ( me) that im not as sensitive as I think and NOT celiac!Correction Mr white coat its not what I think but for cause and affect and past test that are not sticking in my medical records.I get sick violently with foods consumed, not eating the foods will show Im fabulous. After many blood draws and going through doctors I have the HLA- DQ2 positive which I read in a study that Iran conducted that the severity in celiac is in that gene.Im glutenfree and dealing with related issues which core issue of celiac isn't addressed. My skin, right eye, left leg diagestive issues affected. I have high blood pressure because im in pain.Im waisting my time on trying to reprove that Im celiac which is not a disease I want, but unfortunately have.It  has taken over my life personally and professionally. How do I stop getting medically gaslight and get the help needed to bounce back if I ever do bounce back to normal? I thought I was in good care with " celiac specialist " but in her eyes Im good.Im NOT.Sibo positive, IBS, Chronic Fatigue just to name a few and its all related to what I like to call a ghost disease ( celiac) since doctors don't seem to take it seriously. 
    • trents
      Celiac getting dentures

      By trents · Posted

      @Martha Mitchell, your reaction to the lens implant with gluten sounds like it could be an allergic reaction rather than a celiac reaction. It is possible for a celiac to be also allergic to gluten as it is a protein component in wheat, barley and rye.
    • JoJo0611
      Chances of being coeliac

      By JoJo0611 · Posted

      Thank you all. 
    • Martha Mitchell
      Celiac getting dentures

      By Martha Mitchell · Posted

      Scott I also have different symptoms than most people. It affects me bad. Stomach ache, headache, nauseous, heart racing, whole body shaking, can't walk then my throat starts to close. It attacks my nervous system. The only thing that saves me is a 1/2 of Xanax...it calms down my nervous system 
    • Martha Mitchell
      Celiac getting dentures

      By Martha Mitchell · Posted

      Scott Adams. I was dealing with a DR that didn't care about me being celiac. I repeatedly told him that I was celiac and is everything gluten-free. He put an acrylic lens from j&j. I called the company to ask about gluten and was told yes that the acrylic they use has gluten....then they back tracked immediately and stopped talking to me. The Dr didn't care that I was having issues. It took me 6 months and a lot of sickness to get it removed.... which can only happen within 6 months. The Dr that took it out said that it was fused and that's why I lost vision. If they would have removed it right away everything would be fine. He put in a silicone one that was gluten-free and I've had no issues at all in the other eye. Do not do acrylic!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.