Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Iga levels still so high


Penny80

Recommended Posts

Penny80 Rookie

Hi there

So I had my yearly blood tests done and got the results today.  A year ago I was diagnosed via gastroscope (mt GP sent me straight to have teh scope I didnt even have bloods done thats how sure she was I had it) - the dr came out and basically told me straight away I had celiac disease as could see total villous atrophy.  So anyway one year later and even though my iron, liver, B12, zinc etc levels are looking ok now, my Ttg iga levels were really really elevated.  Dr said I must be getting some cross contamination form somewhere.  I know I was glutened the week I had teh blood test - no idea what from but I wasn't well - I feel fine this week.  If i was to have a test now would my levels be looking in better shape? Or as they so high because I had so much damage initially? Can being glutened make these levels not an accurate representation of healing?

Hope this all makes sense. :)  I'm just disheartened because I've been so stringent about gluten all year and take no chances.  Although I guess I don't know what my original gluten antibodies were so maybe even this level is better than before....:(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I think you are right.  Your TTG could have been way more elevated at the time of your diagnosis.  My own lab only measures anything less than 100. 

The TTG can take a long time to come down (a year or longer).  Why?  Most often is is due to gluten exposures or it can be due to other AI issues.   The learning curve for the diet can be steep.  In my opinion, just swapping out traditional junk food for gluten-free junk food is not good for someone who has a serious illness.  Keep to the gluten-free diet and avoid taking risks.  The times I have been glutened have occurred when I have  eaten out.  I stick to dedicated gluten-free restaurants now or those that get excellent reviews from celiacs.  

Now...just for the future, I will share my story.  Two years ago, I had a gluten exposure, the flu, a cold and a tooth infection all in a matter of weeks.  I only test positve to the DGP IgA and it was over 100 (off the lab charts) after those recent illnesses and possibly my antibiotics (no proof).  Besides GI issues, I developed daily hives that lasted six months.  I went  on a strict “Dr. Fasano” diet for a few months once my hives resolved in an attempt to deal with my New GERD symptoms.  Mind you,  my DGP IgA was still very elevated.   A year later from that initial glutening, I agreed to repeat biopsies.  My small intestine had healed but I had developed Chronic Autoimmune Gastritis.  Studies have shown that the celiac antibodies tests are helpful for diagnosing celiac disease, but not always for dietary compliance.   So, not everything is due to active celiac disease.  Do not let you or your doctors place that single label on yourself! 

Did I mention that my thyroid antibodies were whacked out at the time of my hives?  My theory (and my doctors) is that if I trigger my celiac disease with a gluten exposure, it sets off a cascade of other autoimmune issues.  

Keep up the good work.  Do not beat yourself up and wait for that next TTG test.  Okay, it is not the best tool in the toolbox as I have stated, but it is the only non-invasive test we have.  

Hang in there.  

  • 2 months later...
steve007 Newbie

hi,  I was wondering about the blood test numbers and what they mean and how long it takes them to come down to 20,, if ever they come to normal ?  mine was 160 on blood test,,   confirmed celiac on scope a few months later..  anyone have any idea  if the numbers decrease at what rate once on the gluten-free diet ?  ty

cyclinglady Grand Master
2 hours ago, steve007 said:

hi,  I was wondering about the blood test numbers and what they mean and how long it takes them to come down to 20,, if ever they come to normal ?  mine was 160 on blood test,,   confirmed celiac on scope a few months later..  anyone have any idea  if the numbers decrease at what rate once on the gluten-free diet ?  ty

As long as they are going down, you should be happy.  The celiac blood tests were meant to help diagnose celiac disease, but not to monitor the gluten-free diet.  However, it is the only non-evasive “tool in the toolbox” for now.  You can expect for those numbers to take a year or so to come down.  It all depends on how well you do on the diet and how your body responds.  Everyone is different!  

Welcome tomthe forum.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    2. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    3. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    4. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,332
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Roxy79
    Newest Member
    Roxy79
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you had both and endoscopy with biopsy and a colonoscopy. That helps me understand what you were trying to communicate. No, no! It never occurred to me that you were trying to mislead me. It's just that we get a lot of posters on the forum who are misinformed about what celiac disease is and how it is diagnosed so I need some clarification from you which you were so gracious to give.
    • barb simkin
      I had both the genetic genes for celiac.  My gastroenologist advised he also took a biopsy during one of my colonoscopies and endoscopy and advised I had celiac disease, along with stomach ulcers from my esophagus stomach down to my small bowel. I was shown the ulcers on the catscan and endoscopy report.  I also had polyps in 3 places throughout my large bowel. I was on a strict diet for months following.  I am sorry if I didnt define how I was diagnosed with celiac disease.  I am sorry if you think I was misleading you. I also had to pay $150.00 for the genetic testing.
    • trents
      So, I'm a little confused here. I understand you to say that you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac disease. Is this correct?  You have had genetic testing done to check for the potential for developing celiac disease and that was positive. Is this correct? I think you meant to type "gluten sensitivity" but you typed "gluten insensitivity". Just so we are clear about the terminology, there is celiac disease and there is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They are not the same but they have overlapping symptoms. Celiac disease causes damage to the small bowel lining but NCGS does not. NCGS is often referred to in short form as gluten sensitivity. However, people often use the terms celiac disease and gluten sensitivity interchangeably so it can be unclear which disease they are referring to. Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has one or both of  the genes that have been most strongly connected with the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. This makes the genetic test useful for ruling out celiac disease but not for diagnosing it. A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease because it doesn't permit the scope to go up into the small bowel where celiac disease does the damage. They use an endoscopy ("upper GI) for checking the small bowel lining for celiac damage.
    • barb simkin
      I did nor read the chocolate pkg as it was of fered to me and I ate 2 pcs. I do know that only very dark chocolate and and a very few others are gluten free. Most alcohols contain gluten. I have several yrs of not knowing my celiac condition as docs would not do the test. After looking on the internet about my sufferings I insisted on the gene trsting which showed positive for gluten insensitivity and a biopsy on my next colonoscopy that also showed positive which could not help the damage done to my small bowel. So I very rarely have a glass of wine
    • trents
      @barb simkin, are you sure the chocolate products are gluten-free and not "manufactured on equipment that also handles wheat products and tree nuts", i.e., cross-contamination? And what kind of alcoholic beverages are we talking about? Most beers are made from gluten-containing grains. Just checking.
×
×
  • Create New...