Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Positive/biopsy Inconclusive


juliea(australia)

Recommended Posts

juliea(australia) Newbie

Hi everyone, My son who has type 1 diabetes went in for a biopsy following an elevated Ttg screen, the other tests were negative. The biop was inconclusive. The gastro doctor thinks it is celiacs and wants to treat it as that for 6 months and then repeat the biopsy. If the inflammation has not gone then it could be something else but he wouldn't go there!!!!! My son has had no symptoms and i am really worried it may be something else that is worse! Has anyone else has this sort of experience???


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

if the blood test was positive, I wouldn't worry about another biopsy. Seriously. Go ahead and put him on the gluten-free diet 100% no cheating, and don't look back. In children (and in some adults) the damage isn't significant enough yet for it to show on biopsy, or they didn't get enough samples and just missed the damaged areas because it can be sporadic. If he saw inflammation, this could be indicitive of Chrons or Colitis (which in my opinion is also related to celiac and if caught soon enough and treated with the gluten-free diet will go away) So, DON'T PANIC, don't worry about another biopsy, tell the Dr. after you start to see improvements in his health on the diet, that you want him to dx positively based on blood work and positive dietary response. It is sufficient.

The ONLY reason to have a follow up biopsy would be if he DOES NOT improve at all in that time. Also, six months is a fairly short time, but in kids you should see tremendous results in that time. In adults the average healing time is about 2 years or more depending on how much damage. But since kids haven't had enough time to accumulate a lot of damage (unless they already are in the advanced stages of the disease) they heal so much quicker.

VydorScope Proficient

I am not a doctor, nor do I prentend to be one, however I have a degree in statistics and this gives me a better understanding of testing and test results then problably most doctors.

The Biopsy, IMO, is a poor diagnostic tool. It can only CONFIRM celiac disease, it can never, ever, under no known conditions ever rule out celiac disease. This means you will gain no NEW information by it. If you have a postive blood test there is , IMO, no reason for a biospy. There are other good reasons for endoscopies, to look for OTHER conditions, but as relateted to celiac disease, the biopsy is a poor outdate choice that I hope goes away soon.

Again, I am not a doctor, nor have I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express recently. :D

I would highly suggest you follow nini's advice :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    2. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    3. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    4. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    5. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.