Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab


Guest cassidy

Recommended Posts

Guest cassidy

I had a negative blood test and negative biopsy, but very positive dietary reactions. I keep going back and forth on how important it is to get an official diagnosis. I'm sticking to my diet, but I would like some sort of confirmation.

Has anyone gone to Enterolab when they had symptoms and a negative blood test and gotten a negative result withe Enterolab? Was the testing covered by insurance? Did you feel it was a good use of money? Were you happy with their professionalism and the testing procedure?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



teankerbell Apprentice

My stool test from Enterolab came back positive, but blood results were negative. So conflicting results. My doctor says that test results are not always reliable and feels that if you feel better off gluten then you have your answer.

How long have you been gluten-free? If you happen to be gluten-free for over 8 months, the stool test could come out negative.

I did not use insurance to pay for the lab test, but our FSA (flex spend account). I feel it was worth it because I also found out I am casein intolerant.

dlp252 Apprentice

There have been a couple of people that I can remember on the boards who had a negative test from Enterolabs, but I'm not sure they're still posting here. If I can find the posts I'll post a link. The Enterolab website says you can be gluten-free for about a year and their test will still find the antibodies. I never went the traditional way of testing because I had been on a low carb diet for a couple of years, so figured the tests wouldn't catch anything anyway, so I went directly to Enterolabs. I didn't submit it to my insurance so don't know if they would have paid, I do, however, think it was worth it for me to know for sure (I tend to rationalize away the good common sense I should have about my diet, so to have something concrete keeps me on the right path).

Okay, here's the recent one I was thinking of:

Open Original Shared Link

jnclelland Contributor
Has anyone gone to Enterolab when they had symptoms and a negative blood test and gotten a negative result withe Enterolab? Was the testing covered by insurance? Did you feel it was a good use of money? Were you happy with their professionalism and the testing procedure?

(raises hand) That would be me! I finally decided to do Enterolab after about 8 months gluten-free, and everything came back negative - except for the gene test, which showed that I have one celiac gene and one gene for non-celiac gluten-sensitivity. Two of the tests were towards the high end of the negative range, and I *suspect* that they might have been positive if I had done the test sooner after going gluten-free - but of course I'll never know!

It wasn't covered by my insurance. I wish it weren't so expensive, and I'm a bit frustrated that it game back negative, because what I *really* wanted was some sort of diagnosis. But they were very professional, and one of the nurses sent me a nice email response to my questions about what the "high negative" really meant (basically, she said that it's entirely possible it would have been a low positive 8 months ago, but there's no way to know for sure). And I am glad to have the results of the genetic testing, because now I KNOW that my kids will each have a gene for gluten sensitivity of some sort, and it's something definite that I can tell their ped if I ever decide I want to get them tested. (I'm actually considering having my son tested, but he doesn't really have any severe symptoms, just a few little things that make me wonder. So I'm still on the fence about it...)

Jeanne

slpinsd Contributor

I had only a positive IgG with blood, and with Enterolab, I had a positive IgA. They test both Antigliadin IgA and Antigliadin Transglutaminase.

The gene testing was very helpful, showing 2 copies of the Celiac Gene. For that it was worth the money.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.