Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Is A "safe" Amount Of Gluten In Food?


sparkles

Recommended Posts

sparkles Contributor

I thought when I was diagnosed with celiac disease I needed to be 100% gluten-free. I was reading the Delphi gluten-free product list and under coca cola, the company said that it could not guarantee that their products were 100% gluten-free but that the amount of gluten in their products (if gluten was present) was below the amount of gluten that the FDA considers safe and symptom free for celiacs. This is overwelmingly confusing! Does anyone know what is the TRUTH? Can we consume under a certain amount of gluten and not suffer damage to the villa???? I know that gluten can be consumed with no sympoms presenting themselves but just having no symptoms does not make gluten safe...so what is the answer? I thought that this disease was fairly well under control but sypmtoms have been returning slowly for the past few years as I have tried adding gluten-free foods. Obviously, I am getting hidden gluten. Is this because of how the FDA allows companies to define gluten-free and gluten-free is really NOT 100% gluten-free??? Please help!!!! Giving up real bread and real brownies was absolutely heartbreaking, but giving up REAL Coca Cola may push me over the edge!!!!!! Even tho I am diabetic, I save my carbs to be able to have a REAL Coke occasionally!!!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest Robbin

I am confused about this too. I would think that if you consume a teeny bit here and a teeny bit there, by the end of a day/week/month you are getting some damage. I read that a study showed that 1/50 of a slice of bread showed damage to villi, so it isn't much. I am not sure how much is really safe at all. Anyone else have any thing to offer??Take care, :)

Also, maybe you have another intolerance creeping in?

psawyer Proficient

This is a case of ask three experts, get four answers.

Companies will not "guarantee" anything for fear of lawsuits.

In the US, there is currently no offically (FDA) prescribed definition of "gluten-free".

You can't scientifically prove a negative. Thorough testing may not find detectable levels of "X" in a substance, place, or whatever. There could be some that is below the sensitivity level of the test. Or, it could be unevenly distributed, and none of the samples contain it. For example, I test 20 specific locations in my back yard and find no dog excrement. This does not prove that there is no doggie do-do in my yard at all. It just shows that I did not find any, this time.

Cross-contamination is possible in any product. Manufacturers buy from other sources, who in turn may buy from other sources. See "no guarantee," above.

There are carcinogens in diesel exhaust. I'm not going to stand behind a truck and inhale near the exhaust pipe. But buses run along my street. I don't live inside an oxygen tent, so I am certainly getting trace exposure.

Innocent people are killed on a regular basis for driving on roads where idiots drive. Nevertheless, I drive on a regular basis. I know there is a risk, but I can't stay at home all day, every day.

If you look carefully at everything, you may be able to find the source or sources of your symptoms. Keep in mind that things other than gluten can cause problems. Most of us with celiac disease have other sensitivities as well. I get very sick if I eat crustacean shellfish, but that does not mean that lobster contains gluten!

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

Peter, If I knew how to do the "quote" thing, I would certainly do so! Excellent analogy -- I actually can use that -- thanks!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,634
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tiana
    Newest Member
    Tiana
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree, there can be contamination at many points--milling is another possible source of contamination for any flours.
    • trents
      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.