Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results Help


kbial

Recommended Posts

kbial Newbie

I had a endoscopy done due to random stomach pains every so often and my doctor said everything looks fine but said the biopsy is showing some minor problems with the lining in my small intestine. He asked that I get a celiac blood test done and I got the results back today and am very overwhelmed/ confused.

both the IgA immunoglobulin and Deamidated Gliadin are within normal range but my Transglutaminase antibodies are very high.

IgA Immunoglobulin: 2.55 g/L. Normal Range: 0.69-3.82

Deamidated Gliadin IgG Antibodies: 6.5 u/ml. Negative: <15 u/ml, Positive >=15 u/ml

Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies: 80 u/ml. Negative: <15 u/ml, Positive >=15 u/ml

 

Has anyone had similar results? My follow up with my doctor is in 2 weeks and these results have been making me incredibly anxious. Is this for sure celiac or could it be something else? Any insight would be appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

"The finding of tissue transglutaminase (tTG)-IgA antibodies is specific for celiac disease and possibly for dermatitis herpetiformis. For individuals with moderately to strongly positive results, a diagnosis of celiac disease is likely and the patient should undergo biopsy to confirm the diagnosis.https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Overview/82587

Biopsy results can be affected by the skill and thoroughness of the one doing the biopsy in that some practitioners don't take the samples from the right areas. They can also be affected by the length of time you have been eating gluten sense the Celiac Disease was triggered and became active. And if someone was already eating gluten free beforehand there may have been a degree of healing.

Edited by trents
DJFL77I Experienced

80 is most probably celiac..

mine was 100+...

now its down to 13 after going gluten free for like 4.5 months an getting checked again for the first time...

my Dr said how high the number is at diagnosis doesn't really matter..  only that it begins dropping once starting gluten free 

kbial Newbie
5 hours ago, DJFL77I said:

80 is most probably celiac..

mine was 100+...

now its down to 13 after going gluten free for like 4.5 months an getting checked again for the first time...

my Dr said how high the number is at diagnosis doesn't really matter..  only that it begins dropping once starting gluten free 

Thanks for the response. Was your DGP IGg also negative?

DJFL77I Experienced

Dunno.. never had that tested . It's not in my latest panel results either

Kate333 Rising Star

Hi kbial.  Only your GI doc can give you a definitive diagnosis. 

My test results were similar to yours.  At its highest (last fall, at the time of my first blood test and endoscopy) my TTG level was 224.  My DGP level has always been in "normal" range.   My scope was negative for celiac sprue.

But don't panic because the good news is that your TTG blood level should rapidly plunge back down to "normal range" once you adopt and stick to a STRICT gluten-free diet and, hopefully, you will feel much better as you heal.  It took me about 6 months for my TTG test result numbers to decline from over 200+ to .50 (nearly zero), from March '20 to Sept. '20.   I say "strict gluten-free" because IMO continuing to eat packaged foods, even those labeled "gluten-free" or "certified gluten-free" still carries an unreasonably high risk of gluten exposure, esp. for newly-diagnosed patients in early stages of healing.     And you cannot "cheat" on the gluten-free diet (even "only a little bit") and expect to heal or your blood level to return to normal.  

After my first blood test, I just assumed I could safely continue eating packaged foods, as long as I checked (and believed) food manuf. labels/claims.  But then I noticed my TTG numbers didn't completely return to normal until AFTER I began buying, cooking, and eating 100% strictly fresh, unpackaged foods and avoiding eat out altogether (even carryout). 

I wanted to hasten my healing/recovery and I was tired of reading/stressing about labels, worrying about the possibility of cross-contamination, or suspect food manuf. claims etc.   I also don't like the taste or contents of gluten-free-labeled foods, which also tend to be very expensive and full of sugar, artificial color, flavors etc.  But to each his/her own.

 

 

 

DJFL77I Experienced
9 hours ago, Kate333 said:

 My scope was negative for celiac sprue.

 

 

 

celiac sprue is just another name for celiac disease.....

and there's no way you can't have damage to your gut.. with a 224 ttg......   if they didn't see it.. they simply missed it with the biopsies

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 2 months later...
MADMOM Community Regular

i agree - i’ve been  gluten free 6 weeks almost and have been learning from trial and error - in my 2-3 week i had some seeded veggies - night shades that just did not agree with me / i also eat very min dairy and more lactose free yogurts and milk since i don’t really get a reaction - i also started cooking more fresh veggies and meats and so far thank god have been improving - weeks 4-now are so much better - ofc i still have sore tummy from time to times but no GI issues as i didn’t really have much to start with - my GI says it takes time and you will have good and bad days- so far i’m learning what not to have and that’s less packaged foods more fresh - i also got great feedback from a lot of ppl on this site which i appreciate so much - puts my mind at ease when i’m stressing out 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,599
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Caroline Alexandria
    Newest Member
    Caroline Alexandria
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.