Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results Help


kbial

Recommended Posts

kbial Newbie

I had a endoscopy done due to random stomach pains every so often and my doctor said everything looks fine but said the biopsy is showing some minor problems with the lining in my small intestine. He asked that I get a celiac blood test done and I got the results back today and am very overwhelmed/ confused.

both the IgA immunoglobulin and Deamidated Gliadin are within normal range but my Transglutaminase antibodies are very high.

IgA Immunoglobulin: 2.55 g/L. Normal Range: 0.69-3.82

Deamidated Gliadin IgG Antibodies: 6.5 u/ml. Negative: <15 u/ml, Positive >=15 u/ml

Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies: 80 u/ml. Negative: <15 u/ml, Positive >=15 u/ml

 

Has anyone had similar results? My follow up with my doctor is in 2 weeks and these results have been making me incredibly anxious. Is this for sure celiac or could it be something else? Any insight would be appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

"The finding of tissue transglutaminase (tTG)-IgA antibodies is specific for celiac disease and possibly for dermatitis herpetiformis. For individuals with moderately to strongly positive results, a diagnosis of celiac disease is likely and the patient should undergo biopsy to confirm the diagnosis.https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Overview/82587

Biopsy results can be affected by the skill and thoroughness of the one doing the biopsy in that some practitioners don't take the samples from the right areas. They can also be affected by the length of time you have been eating gluten sense the Celiac Disease was triggered and became active. And if someone was already eating gluten free beforehand there may have been a degree of healing.

Edited by trents
DJFL77I Experienced

80 is most probably celiac..

mine was 100+...

now its down to 13 after going gluten free for like 4.5 months an getting checked again for the first time...

my Dr said how high the number is at diagnosis doesn't really matter..  only that it begins dropping once starting gluten free 

kbial Newbie
5 hours ago, DJFL77I said:

80 is most probably celiac..

mine was 100+...

now its down to 13 after going gluten free for like 4.5 months an getting checked again for the first time...

my Dr said how high the number is at diagnosis doesn't really matter..  only that it begins dropping once starting gluten free 

Thanks for the response. Was your DGP IGg also negative?

DJFL77I Experienced

Dunno.. never had that tested . It's not in my latest panel results either

Kate333 Rising Star

Hi kbial.  Only your GI doc can give you a definitive diagnosis. 

My test results were similar to yours.  At its highest (last fall, at the time of my first blood test and endoscopy) my TTG level was 224.  My DGP level has always been in "normal" range.   My scope was negative for celiac sprue.

But don't panic because the good news is that your TTG blood level should rapidly plunge back down to "normal range" once you adopt and stick to a STRICT gluten-free diet and, hopefully, you will feel much better as you heal.  It took me about 6 months for my TTG test result numbers to decline from over 200+ to .50 (nearly zero), from March '20 to Sept. '20.   I say "strict gluten-free" because IMO continuing to eat packaged foods, even those labeled "gluten-free" or "certified gluten-free" still carries an unreasonably high risk of gluten exposure, esp. for newly-diagnosed patients in early stages of healing.     And you cannot "cheat" on the gluten-free diet (even "only a little bit") and expect to heal or your blood level to return to normal.  

After my first blood test, I just assumed I could safely continue eating packaged foods, as long as I checked (and believed) food manuf. labels/claims.  But then I noticed my TTG numbers didn't completely return to normal until AFTER I began buying, cooking, and eating 100% strictly fresh, unpackaged foods and avoiding eat out altogether (even carryout). 

I wanted to hasten my healing/recovery and I was tired of reading/stressing about labels, worrying about the possibility of cross-contamination, or suspect food manuf. claims etc.   I also don't like the taste or contents of gluten-free-labeled foods, which also tend to be very expensive and full of sugar, artificial color, flavors etc.  But to each his/her own.

 

 

 

DJFL77I Experienced
9 hours ago, Kate333 said:

 My scope was negative for celiac sprue.

 

 

 

celiac sprue is just another name for celiac disease.....

and there's no way you can't have damage to your gut.. with a 224 ttg......   if they didn't see it.. they simply missed it with the biopsies

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 2 months later...
MADMOM Community Regular

i agree - i’ve been  gluten free 6 weeks almost and have been learning from trial and error - in my 2-3 week i had some seeded veggies - night shades that just did not agree with me / i also eat very min dairy and more lactose free yogurts and milk since i don’t really get a reaction - i also started cooking more fresh veggies and meats and so far thank god have been improving - weeks 4-now are so much better - ofc i still have sore tummy from time to times but no GI issues as i didn’t really have much to start with - my GI says it takes time and you will have good and bad days- so far i’m learning what not to have and that’s less packaged foods more fresh - i also got great feedback from a lot of ppl on this site which i appreciate so much - puts my mind at ease when i’m stressing out 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    2. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    3. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    4. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,333
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BeitAryeh
    Newest Member
    BeitAryeh
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you had both and endoscopy with biopsy and a colonoscopy. That helps me understand what you were trying to communicate. No, no! It never occurred to me that you were trying to mislead me. It's just that we get a lot of posters on the forum who are misinformed about what celiac disease is and how it is diagnosed so I need some clarification from you which you were so gracious to give.
    • barb simkin
      I had both the genetic genes for celiac.  My gastroenologist advised he also took a biopsy during one of my colonoscopies and endoscopy and advised I had celiac disease, along with stomach ulcers from my esophagus stomach down to my small bowel. I was shown the ulcers on the catscan and endoscopy report.  I also had polyps in 3 places throughout my large bowel. I was on a strict diet for months following.  I am sorry if I didnt define how I was diagnosed with celiac disease.  I am sorry if you think I was misleading you. I also had to pay $150.00 for the genetic testing.
    • trents
      So, I'm a little confused here. I understand you to say that you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac disease. Is this correct?  You have had genetic testing done to check for the potential for developing celiac disease and that was positive. Is this correct? I think you meant to type "gluten sensitivity" but you typed "gluten insensitivity". Just so we are clear about the terminology, there is celiac disease and there is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They are not the same but they have overlapping symptoms. Celiac disease causes damage to the small bowel lining but NCGS does not. NCGS is often referred to in short form as gluten sensitivity. However, people often use the terms celiac disease and gluten sensitivity interchangeably so it can be unclear which disease they are referring to. Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has one or both of  the genes that have been most strongly connected with the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. This makes the genetic test useful for ruling out celiac disease but not for diagnosing it. A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease because it doesn't permit the scope to go up into the small bowel where celiac disease does the damage. They use an endoscopy ("upper GI) for checking the small bowel lining for celiac damage.
    • barb simkin
      I did nor read the chocolate pkg as it was of fered to me and I ate 2 pcs. I do know that only very dark chocolate and and a very few others are gluten free. Most alcohols contain gluten. I have several yrs of not knowing my celiac condition as docs would not do the test. After looking on the internet about my sufferings I insisted on the gene trsting which showed positive for gluten insensitivity and a biopsy on my next colonoscopy that also showed positive which could not help the damage done to my small bowel. So I very rarely have a glass of wine
    • trents
      @barb simkin, are you sure the chocolate products are gluten-free and not "manufactured on equipment that also handles wheat products and tree nuts", i.e., cross-contamination? And what kind of alcoholic beverages are we talking about? Most beers are made from gluten-containing grains. Just checking.
×
×
  • Create New...