Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Olives and sesame seeds - risk of cross-contamination?


celiacinrecovery

Recommended Posts

celiacinrecovery Apprentice

My naturopath is treating me for leaky gut and histamine intolerance (on top of my celiac, which is under control). She recommended eating olives before meals, and a "test" where I time the transit time of my bowels by eating sesame seeds.

I don't eat either of these. I know they're gluten free, but whenever I introduce something to my diet my mind turns to the risk of cross-contamination.

How risky are olives and sesame seeds? Are there any things I should keep in mind? I'm particularly concerned about sesame seeds, as from my experience this sort of product is often processed in facilities that also process allergens.

Any thoughts, tips, or words of reassurance? Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



knitty kitty Grand Master
(edited)

Buying certified gluten free products helps immensely.

Nuts.com sells gluten free sesame seeds.

https://nuts.com/gluten-free/cookingbaking/seeds/sesame/?refinementList[Product.facets.value][0]=gluten-free

 

I test my transit time with beets.  Don't be surprised by the color, though.

Edited by knitty kitty
Add more information
  • 2 months later...
Blue-Sky Enthusiast

Sesame seeds and olives are probably good. It is likely for sesame seeds that they take steps to make sure that all dirt or contaminates are removed from the seeds before they are packaged. It is unlikely that wheat or wheat flour contaminates those machines. 

My guess is that highly processed foods like candy for example, which require more steps along the way and more ingredients, are more likely to pick up cross contamination.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,162
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carolyn harkless
    Newest Member
    Carolyn harkless
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.