Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

"Did you/or do you KNOW?"


Yvonne (Vonnie) Mostat, RN

Recommended Posts

Yvonne (Vonnie) Mostat, RN Collaborator

Latest study  published in JAMA, researchers screened 4,24,788 newborn infants for HLA (A genetic predisposition to the development of celiac disease),  Of these, 6, 757 participated,, representing 1.44% of the study population.  The results of this study indicated each additional gram of gluten consumption per day was associated with a 50% increased risk of celiac disease in genetically predisposed children at age 3.  However, because the results were based on such a small subset of the larger sample, the results may not be representative of the broader population.

The second study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology, examined data collected from 1,875 at-risk children between 1993 and 2017. Of th4ese, 151 (8.5%) developed celiac disease autoimmunity (positive blood antibodies) and 85 (4.5% developed celiac disease (biopsy-verified or persistently high blood antibodies).  The researchers found the risk of celiac disease autoimmunity increased by 5% for each gram of gluten consumed between the ages of 1 and 2 years of age.  The risk of later developing celiac disease autoimmunity was found to be strongest for an increased gluten intake at 1 year of age. However, these results were also based on a small subset (3.3%) of the larger sample, focusing only on genetically at-risk children. Because of this, these results should not be generalized to recommendations for children irrespective of genetic risk.

 

Lastly, The AMerican Journal of Gastroenterology recently published a study examinining tyhe moBa-cohort. Unlike the previous two studies, this sstudy was population based and did not consider genetic risk  (HLA)O.  Of ccourse some 113,000 children initially enrolled.  67,608 were included in the study, 738 (1.1%) of whom were diagnosed with celiac disease. The rsearchers found that risk of celiac disease inceased by 3% with each gram of extra gluten intake per day, with gluten who were introducd to gluten at 6 months of age or older havng a significantly higher risk of celiac disease than those introduced at 4 - 6 months.

While the rsults of these three studies suggest that one extra clice of bread (about 2 grams of gluten) per daY SEEMS TO BE LINKED TO AN 20 - 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Vonnie, the way this was presented was confusing to me.

"screened 4,24,788 newborn infants" There's a digit missing there somewhere between the first and second commas I believe.

"HLA" One or both genes that have been identified with celiac disease potential?

"While the rsults of these three studies suggest that one extra clice of bread (about 2 grams of gluten) per daY SEEMS TO BE LINKED TO AN 20 -" This is your last line. Looks like an incomplete thought or sentence.

Is there a summary conclusion that will tie together the findings of all three studies? Something like, if your infant has one or both celic potential genes, feeding them gluten before the age of xx increases the likelihood they will develop active celiac disease by xx%? I'm not sure what the application is here from the data.

You might want to go back and reread your post to correct typos.

Edited by trents

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,072
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    3rdearesl
    Newest Member
    3rdearesl
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Maybe celiac but maybe NCGS that was misdiagnosed as IBS morphing gradually into celiac. Is NCGS a new category to you? It shares many of the same GI symptoms with celiac disease but does not damage the small bowel lining like celiac.
    • knitty kitty
      Thiamine has antifungal properties.  The body uses thiamine to keep bacteria and yeasts from overgrowth in the digestive system.   Fluconazole use can cause thiamine deficiency.   Supplementing with thiamine in the form Benfotiamine would be beneficial as Benfotiamine promotes intestinal healing.   Thiamine and the other B vitamins tend to be low in Celiac due to malabsorption.  Talk to your doctor about supplementing vitamins and minerals.
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome @Natalia Revelo, your experience is profoundly difficult and, sadly, not entirely unique within the celiac community. It's the frustrating reality of "silent" or ongoing damage that isn't captured by the MARSH score alone, which only measures active villous atrophy. Your normal biopsy suggests your diet is preventing the classic autoimmune attack, but it doesn't mean your gut has fully healed or that other issues aren't at play. The inflammation from your newly discovered milk and egg allergies is a huge clue; this constant allergic response can create a low-grade inflammatory environment that severely hampers nutrient absorption, effectively creating a "leaky gut" scenario independent of celiac damage. This is likely why your iron stores deplete so rapidly—your body is both unable to absorb it efficiently and may be losing it through inflammation. While the functional medicine path is expensive, it's clearly providing answers and relief that traditional gastroenterology, focused solely on the gluten-free diet and biopsy results, is missing. To move forward, continue the gut-healing protocols your functional doctor recommends (perhaps exploring alternative options to glutamine that won't irritate your cystitis), maintain your strict avoidance of all allergens and irritants, and know that true healing is a multi-faceted process. You might seek a second opinion from a different gastroenterologist who is more knowledgeable about non-responsive celiac disease and the complex interplay of food allergies and micronutrient absorption, but your current path, while costly, seems to be leading you toward the steady health you need.
    • knitty kitty
      Have you had a DNA test to look for Celiac disease genes?  If she doesn't have any celiac specific genes, look for another explanation.  If she does have Celiac genes, assume they are turned on and active Celiac disease is progressing.  All first degree relatives (mother, father, siblings, children) should be genetically tested as well.   Sometimes blood tests are ambiguous or false negatives if one has anemia, diabetes or thiamine deficiency.  Certain medications like antihistamines and steroids can suppress the immune system and result in false negatives or ambiguous results on antibody tests.  
    • Heatherisle
      That was just the visual report, so need to wait for confirmation or otherwise from the results. They did take a biopsy from the upper end of the duodenum(D1). D2 looked unremarkable on the camera. Just wish we didn’t have to wait so long for the results as she’s naturally a very anxious person. But thanks so much for taking the time to answer me
×
×
  • Create New...