Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Wait to go gluten-free until after endoscope?


bhlowe

Recommended Posts

bhlowe Newbie

Hi there! So, based on a ttg iga tests, my sons (14) are positive for celiac. However, due to insurance issues, I expect it will be a couple of months before we can get an endoscopy for them. Would it be better for them to go gluten-free for the next 6-10 weeks and then go back on gluten for the 2 weeks before the endoscope? Or should we just wait until all the testing is done to start their gluten-free diets? Obviously they would like to wait, and they feel mostly fine (just low iron)... but.... I guess I'm just wondering if waiting 2ish months will/could negatively impact their lifelong health?

THanks. Beth


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, belowe!

I doubt if delaying gluten free eating until after the biopsy would have a long term impact on their health at their young, resilient age. The Mayo Clinic recommends the daily consumption of two slices of wheat bread (or the gluten equivalent) leading up to either kind of testing so if that would represent cutting back on their current amount of gluten intake, that is an option. The problem with going gluten free and then reinstating gluten in time to give valid tests is that once you cut it out, you tend to get more intense reactions to gluten than before. You lose whatever tolerance you once had. Having said all that, since they are asymptomatic, I would delay the gluten-free diet until after all testing is complete.

By the way, including antibody test numbers without reference ranges is not very helpful since every lab uses different reference ranges. Without that, it's hard to know whether 14 is a strong positive or a weak one.

bhlowe Newbie

I meant my boys are 14 years old... they are twins. Sorry I wasn't clear. The tests they took had a standard range of <15. Their numbers were like 60 for one twin and 25 for the other... identical twins. 
Thank you so much for the quick and clear response.

trents Grand Master
(edited)

I would also add that you and the boys' father need to be test for celiac disease. There is almost a 50% chance that the boys' first degree relatives will have or will develop active celiac disease. They got the genes from you and/or their father. About 40% of the general population carries one or both celiac genes, which only establishes the potential to develop celiac disease since only 1-2% of the general population will actually develop active celiac disease. However, having a first degree relative with active celiac disease dramatically pushes up the odds to almost 50% of developing active celiac disease for the others in the family.

Edit: And of that 50%, half of those will be asymptomatic at time of diagnosis.

Edited by trents

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tina Marie Fornash
    Newest Member
    Tina Marie Fornash
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
    • trents
      Jason, I have a bone to pick with your terminology. There is "gluten intolerance" which I believe is synonymous with celiac disease and then there is "gluten sensitivity" which comes from Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or NCGS for short. It is true, however, that there is still a lot of inconsistency in the use of these terms.
    • Liquid lunch
      I can’t say this will work for everyone but for me the difference is incredible so might be worth trying. I’ve never been diagnosed celiac but via an elimination diet I realised I can’t eat any lectins, gluten soy and oats are particularly problematic. If I eat them I’m in bed for a week, then heavy bleeding and extreme pain for another, followed by a third week of bleeding on and off. My skin was a mess and it snowed when I brushed my hair. Since taking reishi and cordyceps mushroom tincture I can’t believe the difference, I’ve had a lot of help from this site so I want to return the favour. I took the tincture for my guts but the most apparent effect is that I feel like my brain works again, I can’t begin to describe how wonderful it is to be able to achieve basic things, I’ve barely been able to organise getting out of bed for so long, it feels like I haven’t been hit over the head with a mallet for the first time in years. Then I glutened myself, not necessarily gluten as so many things wipe me out but definitely ate something I shouldn’t have, I took a treble dose of the tincture and almost immediately felt much better so continued with the increased dose and three days (not weeks) later was back to feeling great, no bleeding involved. My skin is better than I can remember it ever being, I feel great 😊. I spend £1.50 a day on these but it’s worth every penny, I hope this helps someone else out there reading this. I wish I’d known about them 20 years ago. best wishes everyone 🍄 
    • Scott Adams
      Given your history of a high TTG (167) that decreased to 16 on a gluten-free diet, along with genetic confirmation of celiac disease, it’s likely the negative biopsy is a false negative due to not eating gluten before the endoscopy. Gluten is necessary to trigger the intestinal damage seen in celiac disease, and avoiding it can lead to healing and a normal biopsy despite ongoing immune activity (reflected in your still-elevated TTG). The inflammation observed during the endoscopy (“diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa”) could be residual damage, mild ongoing inflammation, or another condition like peptic duodenitis, but it’s consistent with celiac disease in context. Continued positive blood markers suggest ongoing gluten exposure, possibly from cross-contamination or hidden sources. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet and follow-up testing are key to managing symptoms and reducing inflammation. Discuss these findings with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis and refine your dietary approach. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, it sounds like great progress, but what was the time frame between the two endoscopies? 
×
×
  • Create New...