Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Did my old endoscopy even check for celiac?!


hazy gem

Recommended Posts

hazy gem Newbie

Hi there, 

I had an endoscopy several years ago, with (what was communicated to me) the express purpose to check for celiac. (Neither of my first or second GI's did blood tests- were those around in 2017?).

Cut to now, blood test results from a neurologist. Deamid/Gliadin AB IGA 101.2 (Ref value <15.0) and Deamid/Gliadin AB IGG 20 (ref value <15).

So I go straight to a new GI and I get the old endoscopy results sent to him. He says there is no indication that they specifically looked at celiac. Look, I know celiac might have developed later. But my issues literally started when I started eating gluten after not eating it for about a year (I was ahead of the curve on the whole paleo-diet thing) and yes hindsight is 2020 but I had a lot of mental health other issues I was battling so once I found out I wasn't celiac I could never commit to gluten free after that. Also, I would go to doctor after doctor and tell them celiac was ruled out. 

This is from the old endoscopy: Diagnosis & Interpretation: Stomach, Biopsy ANTRAL MUCOSA WITH MILD CHRONIC GASTRITIS AND REACTIVE CHANGE. UNREMARKABLE GASTRIC BODY TYPE MUCOSA. NO INTENSTINAL METAPLASIA DYSPLASIA OR MALIGNANCY. APPROPRIATELY CONTROLLED IMMUNOSTAIN IS NEGATIVE FOR H>PYLORI. Gross Description: Stomach, Biopsy - Labeled as: "Gastric" Received in formalin are 4 fragments of pink-tan soft tissue ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 cm. The specimen is submitted entirely in a single cassette. 

So what are your thoughts? Did they skip the celiac analysis? Why would they do that? What is going on!?

Thank you in advance for any thoughts! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Looks like they only examined and biopsied the stomach. Celiac disease affects the small bowel.

Scott Adams Grand Master

I agree, it looks like they did not take samples in the small bowel for celiac disease. This is rather strange if they told you they were looking to see if you had celiac disease.

Since your blood test results are such a high positive, you will need to decide whether to do another endoscopy, and this article may be helpful:

https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/celiac-disease-blood-antibody-tests-r32/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,244
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nicky2925NZ
    Newest Member
    Nicky2925NZ
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      No, I would not say this at all. If you were diagnosed with celiac disease and were gluten-free for a while, you could have gone into remission. Everyone's body is different, and some celiacs may be able to get regular contamination and not end up with damaged villi and positive antibody tests, while others who ingest tiny amounts will relapse and have full blown symptoms and flattened villi.  Only a full gluten challenge would reveal where you are at this point. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs.      
    • Pablohoyasaxa
      Great  post. The skin issue can be intolerable. I have been taking niacinamide for the past month and have improved with respect to the blistering lesions. 
    • knitty kitty
      I've found taking Niacin Vitamin B 3 in the form that causes flushing (nicotinic acid) helps immensely to clear my skin.  The flushing is harmless and goes away the longer Niacin is taken.  The flushing (vasodilation in the skin) helps the body get rid of the tTg 3 IgA antibodies that cause the blisters.  TTg 2 IgA antibodies are found in the blood and are measured in diagnostic testing for Celiac.  People with Dermatitis Herpetiformis make tTg 3 as well as tTg 2 antibodies.  Niacin Vitamin B3 in the non flushing form niacinamide also works without the flushing, but takes a bit longer.   I also avoid foods containing high levels of iodine because iodine activates the tTg 3 IgA antibodies to become more active and make more blisters.  I avoid kelp (nori, seaweed) and crustaceans,  eggs, dairy products, and iodized table salt.   Niacinamide and Nicotinic acid are water soluble and harmless.  I'd much rather take Niacin than Dapsone with scary side effects.  
    • meghanf
      We have a gluten-free household. It's the least stressful option. No one else in my family has Celiac, but they are all extremely supportive. We don't even have Play-doh for this kids.
×
×
  • Create New...