Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Schar Gluten Free Croissant


plumbago

Recommended Posts

plumbago Experienced

I'm a little surprised I didn't read the back of the package until I had already consumed all the croissants, but for ingredients, it lists: Wheat* starch, water, vegetable palm of egg, and so on.

The * has: The wheat has been processed to allow this food to meet the FDA requirements for gluten free food.

What do people think of this?

Plumbago


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



herminia Apprentice
32 minutes ago, plumbago said:

I'm a little surprised I didn't read the back of the package until I had already consumed all the croissants, but for ingredients, it lists: Wheat* starch, water, vegetable palm of egg, and so on.

The * has: The wheat has been processed to allow this food to meet the FDA requirements for gluten free food.

What do people think of this?

Plumbago

The word "wheat" makes me cringe, esp if it's the first ingredient listed. I'm fairly convinced that the only people that can relate to this immunity, allergy, disease, etc, whatever it is, are the people dealing with it. It was always 'gerd', until a smart,young thing fresh out of med school tested and called it celiac. Next 2 docs said No, it's not; 4th doc used variety of tests and said Yup, you've got celiac and sent me to a nutritionist: life-changing.

 

RMJ Mentor

As long as the final product tests under 20ppm the FDA allows this, and it is labeled correctly per FDA regulations.  I still probably wouldn’t eat it.

plumbago Experienced

Yeah, @RMJ it was quite shocking to read "wheat" as the first ingredient! I kind of couldn't believe it. Thanks for weighing in.

shadycharacter Enthusiast
2 hours ago, plumbago said:

I'm a little surprised I didn't read the back of the package until I had already consumed all the croissants, but for ingredients, it lists: Wheat* starch, water, vegetable palm of egg, and so on.

The * has: The wheat has been processed to allow this food to meet the FDA requirements for gluten free food.

What do people think of this?

Plumbago

They've removed over 99.9 % of the gluten from the wheat. Normal wheat contains around 9 g gluten per 100 g. A product can be called gluten free if it contains less than 2 mg gluten per 100 g. 

Had to look it up because I realised I had no idea how they manage to separate gluten from starch. After milling and adding water the mix is centrifugated:

"Through a process called centrifugation the major constituents of the flour are separated. The starch and other constituents dissolve, but the gluten, which is not water soluble, does not.
Once starch and gluten are separated by centrifugation, the gluten is washed thoroughly and dried."


https://starch.eu/priority/factsheet-on-wheat-gluten-and-gluten-related-disorders/#:~:text=Through a process called centrifugation,is washed thoroughly and dried.

 

herminia Apprentice
1 hour ago, shadycharacter said:

They've removed over 99.9 % of the gluten from the wheat. Normal wheat contains around 9 g gluten per 100 g. A product can be called gluten free if it contains less than 2 mg gluten per 100 g. 

Had to look it up because I realised I had no idea how they manage to separate gluten from starch. After milling and adding water the mix is centrifugated:

"Through a process called centrifugation the major constituents of the flour are separated. The starch and other constituents dissolve, but the gluten, which is not water soluble, does not.
Once starch and gluten are separated by centrifugation, the gluten is washed thoroughly and dried."


https://starch.eu/priority/factsheet-on-wheat-gluten-and-gluten-related-disorders/#:~:text=

1 hour ago, shadycharacter said:

They've removed over 99.9 % of the gluten from the wheat. Normal wheat contains around 9 g gluten per 100 g. A product can be called gluten free if it contains less than 2 mg gluten per 100 g. 

Had to look it up because I realised I had no idea how they manage to separate gluten from starch. After milling and adding water the mix is centrifugated:

"Through a process called centrifugation the major constituents of the flour are separated. The starch and other constituents dissolve, but the gluten, which is not water soluble, does not.
Once starch and gluten are separated by centrifugation, the gluten is washed thoroughly and dried."


https://starch.eu/priority/factsheet-on-wheat-gluten-and-gluten-related-disorders/#:~:text=Through a process called centrifugation,is washed thoroughly and dried.

 

Through a process called centrifugation,is washed thoroughly and dried.

 

Did you experience ANY reaction after eating the croissant, and would you do it again?

plumbago Experienced

@herminia none whatsoever. The croissants were delicious. Would I do it again? If I verify that it's ok, but I need to learn more about it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



herminia Apprentice
1 minute ago, plumbago said:

@herminia none whatsoever. The croissants were delicious. Would I do it again? If I verify that it's ok, but I need to learn more about it.

Let us know. I've had NO croissants for years. Brand?

Scott Adams Grand Master

Celiacs in Europe have been eating Codex wheat starch for decades…it used to be under 200ppm, now it’s under 20ppm. We have a whole category of articles on this topic:

https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/gluten-free-diet-celiac-disease-amp-codex-alimentarius-wheat-starch/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,345
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Louise Sullivan
    Newest Member
    Louise Sullivan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      My reaction to a gluten bolus exposure is similar to yours, with 2-3 hours of severe abdominal cramps and intractable emesis followed by several hours of diarrhea. I don't necessarily equate that one large exposure to gluten with significant intestinal lining damage, however. I think it's just a violent reaction to a what the body perceives to be a somewhat toxic substance that I am no longer tolerant of because I have quit exposing myself to it regularly. It's just the body purging itself of it rather than an expression of significant damage. Before diagnosis, when I was consuming gluten daily, I had little to no GI distress. I was, for the most part, a "silent celiac". The damage to my small bowel lining didn't happen all at once but was slow and insidious, accumulating over a period of years. The last time I got a big shot of gluten was about three years ago when I got my wife's wheat biscuits mixed up with my gluten-free ones. There was this acute reaction after about two hours of ingestion as I described above. I felt washed out for a few days and fully recovered within a week or so.  Now, I'm a 74-year-old male. So, I'm not worried about being pregnant. And I don't want to contradict your physicians advice. But I just don't think you have done significant damage to your small bowel lining by one episode of significant gluten ingestion. I just don't think it works that way.
    • Skydawg
      Wondering about some thoughts on how long to wait to try to get pregnant after a gluten exposure?  I have been diagnosed for 10 years and have followed the diet strictly. I have been cross contaminated before, but have never had a full on gluten exposure. I went to a restaurant recently, and the waiter messed up and gave me regular bread and told me it was gluten free. 2 hours later I was throwing up for the whole evening. I have never had that kind of reaction before as I have never had such a big exposure. My husband and I were planning to start trying to get pregnant this month. My dr did blood work to check for electrolytes and white blood cells, but did not do a full nutritional panel. Most of my GI symptoms have resolved in the past 2 weeks, but I am definitely still dealing with brain fog, fatigue and headaches. My dr has recommended I wait 3 months before I start to try to get pregnant.   I have read else where about how long it can take for the intestine to fully heal, and the impacts gluten exposure can have on pregnancy. I guess I am really wondering if anyone has had a similar experience? How long does it take to heal after 1 exposure like that, after following the diet so well for 10 years? Is 3 months an okay amount of time to wait? Is there anything I can do in the meantime to reduce my symptoms? 
    • ShadowLoom
      I’ve used tinctures and made my own edibles with gluten-free ingredients to stay safe. Dispensary staff don’t always know about gluten, so I double-check labels or just make my own.
    • Scott Adams
      It's great to hear that there are some good doctors out there, and this is an example of why having a formal diagnosis can definitely be helpful.
    • RMJ
      Update: I have a wonderful new gastroenterologist. She wants to be sure there’s nothing more serious, like refractory celiac, going on. She ordered various tests including some micronutrient tests that no one has ever ordered before.  I’m deficient in folate and zinc and starting supplements for both. I’m so glad I decided to go to a new GI!
×
×
  • Create New...