Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Son’s celiac labs


gladwella
Go to solution Solved by Scott Adams,

Recommended Posts

gladwella Newbie

Some of my son’s labs came back and I’m trying to understand what they may mean. 
tTG-IgA = negative 

DMG-IgA = positive 

DMG-IgG = negative 

EMA = still waiting on these

I understand this group cannot diagnose, but am just trying to get a handle on what may be going on. If two of the three returned are negative does this mean it’s not celiac and more of a gluten sensitivity or if any of the results returned are positive does that mean further work up/biopsy is warranted?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gladwella Newbie
3 minutes ago, gladwella said:

Some of my son’s labs came back and I’m trying to understand what they may mean. 
tTG-IgA = negative (0.5) range: 0.0-14.9

DMG-IgA = positive (26.3) range: 0.0-14.9

DMG-IgG = negative (0.4) range 0.0-14.9

EMA = still waiting on these

I understand this group cannot diagnose, but am just trying to get a handle on what may be going on. If two of the three returned are negative does this mean it’s not celiac and more of a gluten sensitivity or if any of the results returned are positive does that mean further work up/biopsy is warranted?

 

trents Grand Master

Did you mistype? We are used to seeing DGP-IGA and DGP-IGG instead of "DMG-".

The two most targeted tests you had run for celiac disease are the tTG-IGA and the EMA. The other two are not as specific for celiac disease. The tTG-IGA is the most popular blood antibody test run by physicians for celiac disease. It combines good sensitivity with good specificity. The EMA is is an older test but quite specific. It is expensive to run and has given way to the tTG-IGA which accomplishes much the same thing and is less expensive. The positive DMG-IgA could possible indicate celiac disease but is less specific so positives can be caused by other things and is sometimes very helpful, especially when total IgA count is low or if someone has already been cutting back on gluten before testing.

Some questions:

1. How old is your son? Children's immune systems are immature and sometimes don't respond typically to celiac antibody testing the same way as do adults. Some of the secondary antibody tests such as the DGP-IGG and DGP-IGA can be helpful in spotting celiac disease in these cases.

2. Before the celiac blood antibody tests were run, had he been limiting his consumption of gluten to avoid unpleasant symptoms? If so, this can sabotage the testing and cause false negatives.

gladwella Newbie

Thank you for responding! Yes, I did mistype, apologies for that, this is all still very new. The Deamidated Gliadine IgA was positive while the IgG was negative. 

1. He is 9 with a long history of GI issues and abdominal pain 

2. We hadn’t restricted gluten yet but don’t have a gluten heavy diet in general. He has been food restricting for about a month (we attributed it to stress), so that could likely throw off the results some. I hadn’t considered that.

 

1 minute ago, trents said:

Did you mistype? We are used to seeing DGP-IGA and DGP-IGG instead of "DMG-".

The two most targeted tests you had run for celiac disease are the tTG-IGA and the EMA. The other two are not as specific for celiac disease. The tTG-IGA is the most popular blood antibody test run by physicians for celiac disease. It combines good sensitivity with good specificity. The EMA is is an older test but quite specific. It is expensive to run and has given way to the tTG-IGA which accomplishes much the same thing and is less expensive. The positive DMG-IgA could possible indicate celiac disease but is less specific so positives can be caused by other things and is sometimes very helpful, especially when total IgA count is low or if someone has already been cutting back on gluten before testing.

Some questions:

1. How old is your son? Children's immune systems are immature and sometimes don't respond typically to celiac antibody testing the same way as do adults. Some of the secondary antibody tests such as the DGP-IGG and DGP-IGA can be helpful in spotting celiac disease in these cases.

2. Before the celiac blood antibody tests were run, had he been limiting his consumption of gluten to avoid unpleasant symptoms? If so, this can sabotage the testing and cause false negatives.

 

trents Grand Master

It is also possible your son has NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease but does not damage the villous lining of  the small bowel as does celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease but there is no definitive test for it at the present time. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. The antidote is the same, however, and that is complete abstinence from gluten for life. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease. When you are satisfied that all testing for celiac disease is done, it would seem the next logical step would be to put your son on a strict gluten free diet and see if his symptoms improve.

  • Solution
Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.

 

 

gladwella Newbie

Trents & Scott, thank you so much for the information! This has given me some excellent resources and information to consider!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,963
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pat Martin
    Newest Member
    Pat Martin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @CeliacNew, If you are Vegan to help you feel better, reconsider returning to omnivore.  Actually, since you are already on a very restrictive diet, transitioning to gluten free might be easier for you.  Read the ingredient labels, Particularly vitamin D and Choline require supplements for vegan diet because our primary source is sun, eggs and beef.  B12 also.
    • Wheatwacked
      Once you've completed testing and still don't have improvement, start a trial gluten free diet.  Looking for imprvement that may indicate Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, which is 10 times more prevalent than Celiac Disease. Deficiencies in vitamins B6, B12, D, and C can manifest as skin rashes.  Virtual guaranty you are deficient in vitamin D.
    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
×
×
  • Create New...