Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Based on these bloodwork this would indicate celiac disease?


Tabater

Recommended Posts

Tabater Newbie

Hello,

I recently got some blood work done and it is as follows: 

tissue transglutaminase IgA: 24.0 U/mL (range <7.0 U/mL)

tissue transglutaminase IgA interpretation: positive.

i have seen my dr, and he does day it is very likely celiac disease and has referred me to get biopsy but the wait times here can be long. I asked him how likely it would be having this blood work be this but biopsy be negative and he said that could happen but the blood work would still indicate celiac. I am in the dark on this condition and would be grateful for some advice! Thank you! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

I agree with your doctor's interpretation. Specifically, what advice are you seeking? The one piece of advice you do need to hear is not to begin a gluten free diet until the biopsy is complete. Be sure to eat plenty of gluten containing foods until the biopsy is done or you risk invalidating the biopsy.

Tabater Newbie

 

3 minutes ago, trents said:

I agree with your doctor's interpretation. Specifically, what advice are you seeking? The one piece of advice you do need to hear is not to begin a gluten free diet until the biopsy is complete. Be sure to eat plenty of gluten containing foods until the biopsy is done or you risk invalidating the biopsy.

Thank you for responding! I guess the advice I was seeking that if the biopsy did for some reason come back negative, that I should still be under the assumption that I do have celiac disease?

trents Grand Master

Biopsies do indeed come back negative sometimes for those who actually do have celiac disease and for three chief reasons:

1. The damage is patchy and the sampling was not thorough enough.

2. The celiac disease is in the very early stages and has not produced sufficient damage to show on the biopsy.

3. The gluten free diet was begun ahead of the biopsy

Yes, if the biopsy comes back negative, if I were you I would operate under the assumption that you do have celiac disease and begin the gluten free diet. If symptoms improve after going gluten free, well . . . the proof is in the pudding.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,114
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MarilynnJ
    Newest Member
    MarilynnJ
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Dema
      Ooh thanks for all the info I'll check them out, though I may not be functional after 6 slices for 6 weeks 😅
    • Dema
      alright thank your help! 🤍
    • Scott Adams
      Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is incredibly common and frustrating for many in the celiac and gluten-sensitive community, and it's especially challenging with the added layer of healthcare disparities for people of African descent. A negative endoscopy and blood panel, while the gold standard, are not infallible and can miss cases, particularly if you weren't consuming a significant amount of gluten leading up to the tests (the "gluten challenge"). Your dramatic improvement on a gluten-free diet is the most critical piece of evidence here—your body is giving you the answer the tests could not. The symptoms you're describing now, especially the dyshidrotic eczema and blister bumps, are huge red flags for a gluten-related disorder, and your GP dismissing the possibility of dermatitis herpetiformis without a biopsy is a significant oversight. Requesting a new dermatologist and specifically asking for a skin biopsy next to an active lesion (not on it) is the absolute best next step. In the meantime, documenting your symptoms with photos and a food/symptom diary will build a powerful case for yourself. While the financial burden of a gluten-free diet is very real, your health is the priority; perhaps focusing on naturally gluten-free whole foods like rice, beans, and vegetables, rather than expensive processed substitutes, could be a more sustainable path forward until you can get a definitive opinion.
    • Scott Adams
      While the initial flu-like symptoms are a known side effect of Imiquimod, it is plausible that triggering your immune system in that way could have caused a long-term shift in your autoimmune response, essentially lowering your threshold for a reaction. Your theory is very valid. Given your history, the most logical first step is to eliminate oats entirely, as even certified gluten-free oats can be a trigger for some celiacs due to a protein called avenin. Treat this as strictly as you would wheat, barley, or rye for at least a few months to see if the recurring episodes subside. It's a tangible variable you can control, and many in the community have found significant relief from persistent symptoms after doing so. I'm sorry the medical professionals you've seen have been dismissive; trusting your own body's signals is so important. I truly hope that cutting out oats brings you the answers and relief you deserve.
×
×
  • Create New...