Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is Gluten Food Testing a Secret?


GardeningForHealth

Recommended Posts

GardeningForHealth Enthusiast

Even though I have been on the gluten-free diet for 10 years now, I continue to experience either food intolerances or exposures to gluten; I do not know which it is (or it could be both). These exposures cause illness in the form of fatigue, brain fog, and increased vertigo/dizziness, that are significant enough to impact my ability to be productive and mentally present. 

When I came to this forum I saw that many people here are experiencing these same problems. Yet, we do not know the truth; is it food intolerances, or exposures to gluten? 

In the interest of uncovering the facts and the truth of the matter, I have begun to contact companies requesting their gluten testing. But the responses that I am getting are, so far, not good; they are as follows:

  1. Our gluten testing is proprietary 
  2. We do not do any gluten testing of our finished products, even though our products have a gluten-free label; we trust our suppliers--they are doing the testing
  3. Yes, we do ELISA gluten testing on our products, but we do not share that information

Now, over the years, and recently, I have contacted various companies requesting their COA--Certificate of Analysis. This is a laboratory report showing basic information about the product such as if it has Ecoli or sometimes heavy metals; I have found that some companies will share their COA, and some won't. 

But, so far, zero companies that I have contacted have been willing to share their gluten testing with me. 

Why is that? When I asked the companies why they do not share this information, the contact stops; they do not reply back.

--------------------------

Some may be reading this post and asking why I want to go to such lengths, especially when many companies have detailed pages on their websites explaining all the different protocols they are doing to ensure their foods are free from gluten. This is because, as detailed on this site, Mom's Across America did their own testing and found some "gluten-free" labeled products to contain gluten, and therefore I have come to see company's web pages explaining their gluten-free processes more as just marketing language. In light of recent events, a detailed page is not sufficient.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

I’m beginning to think that gluten free certification is mainly marketing also. From what I can find online it is difficult to know how much testing is done.

Scott Adams Grand Master

I have emailed Cynthia Kelly, the CEO of the GIG and GFCO, to ask questions about where in their step down process the companies are which recently tested positive for gluten, and she confirmed that she could not reveal this information due to their NDA.

To me, the real issue here is that everything seems to be done behind the scenes--the companies can do all of the actual certification testing themselves, and not have to disclose any of it, or they can contract with a lab to do their testing, but that lab would only have to report their results to the company that contracted with them. There is no 3rd party testing required, and all testing is done internally by the companies. All results are subject to the GFCO's NDA and are not made public.

GardeningForHealth Enthusiast

Ok so this is starting to look like we have uncovered something important here; it appears that the gluten testing done by food manufacturers--if any--is done behind the scenes and is done under Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) which prevent the food manufacturer's test results from being shared publicly.

How did that happen? That is not acceptable. Why is data such as testing for e.coli, salmonella, yeast and molds, and heavy metals found in a COA (Certificate of Analysis) shared by some companies and not bound by NDAs, but gluten testing is bound by NDAs? Why the disparate treatment between these two sets of data?

And regardless of the reason, that is not acceptable. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,873
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CSam
    Newest Member
    CSam
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Being low in B12, Folate B9, ferritin, zinc and copper sounds consistent with anemia which can often occur with Celiac.  What did your doctor recommend? What about your Vitamin D?  It helps regulate the immune system.  
    • ehb
      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
    • trents
      That's just it. When they are doing an EGD, even with biopsy, if they aren't thinking about celiac disease they may miss it. They should take several samples from both the duodenum and the duodenum bulb. Damage can be patchy and easily missed if sampling isn't through. And patch damage may explain lack of dramatic symptoms. Let me assure you that we frequently have posters on this forum who were silent celiacs for years and were diagnosed incidentally with celiac disease when their docs were checking for other things. They developed other medical problems such as anemia or vitamin and mineral deficiencies, neurological deficits, Hashimodo's thyroid, osteoporois, etc. - non GI symptoms - but their docs recognized those problems as often connected to celiac disease and had them checked for celiac disease, both blood antibody testing and biopsy, and found damage. A couple of years ago the Mayo Clinic did a large study involving over 300 people. They started with those officially diagnosed with celiac disease and also tested their first degree relatives. They found that almost 50% of  the first degree relatives tested positive for celiac disease and many or most were totally caught by surprise because they were largely asymptomatic. Their diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. I really don't have anything more to say. You have some decisions to make.
    • knitty kitty
      Blood tests are affected by what you've had to eat in the previous day or two and any vitamin supplements you've taken in the past month or two.   If you have been taking vitamins before the time of the blood test, the vitamins supplements could mask a deficiency.  So get the tests before supplementing, or allow eight to twelve weeks for the supplements to wear off.    The thing with blood tests is that they measure what is in the blood, not what is stored inside organs and tissues where vitamins are actually utilized, and may miss subclinical deficiencies.  In times of shortages, the brain can order cells to release their stored vitamins into the blood stream in order to keep important organs like the brain and heart functioning.   Overall, getting blood tests for deficiencies is a good idea if it's available to you.  Ask for an Erythrocyte Transketolace test for Thiamine deficiency.  If you're deficient in any of the B vitamins, take a B Complex with all the B's in it.  The eight B vitamins work with one another like an orchestra.  Supplementing just one can throw the others off.  
×
×
  • Create New...