Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

IgG Ab positive and weird endoscopy report


abtwin26
Go to solution Solved by Wheatwacked,

Recommended Posts

abtwin26 Newbie

Hello, I recently had blood work done and was negative for IgA put positive with IgG.  Then I had a endoscopy which showed intestinal metaplasia; consistent with atrophic/autoimmune
gastritis.  (All result below)

My doctor said that is also a positive for Celiac and said I should continue on a gluten free diet.  So, am I truly Celiac and should I be on a strict diet?   I am worried about the endoscopy since we have colon cancer in the family also.  Thanks for any help.

Gliadin IgG Antibody, Quant
View trends
Normal value: <15 U/mL
Value
17High
Gliadin IgG Ab, Interpretation
View trends
Normal value: Negative
Value
POSITIVE Abnormal
(NOTE)
This assay measures deamidated gliadin IgG peptides.

 

Diagnosis:
 
A. Duodenal bulb, biopsy: Focal gastric antral epithelium/metaplasia,
a finding associated with peptic duodenitis.
 
-No infectious pathogens identified.
 
-Negative for adenoma/dysplasia or malignancy.
 
 
B. Antrum, biopsy: Chemical/reactive gastropathy; mild chronic
gastritis; intestinal metaplasia; consistent with atrophic/autoimmune
gastritis.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

I could be wrong but the pathology report doesn't seem to describe the kind of damage to the lining of the small bowel caused by celiac disease that we normally see. Celiac disease causes a blunting of the villi. It wears them down and reduces the nutrient absorbing efficiency of what starts out to be millions and millions of tiny finger-like projectiles.

When you had the bloodwork done, were you already on a reduced gluten diet by some chance. Which IGA test was done? Can you be more specific? There is: total IGA, TTG-IGA and DGP-IGA that can be run when testing for celiac disease. It's really important to run the total IGA test along with the TTG-IGA test because of total IGA is low it can result in false negatives for the TTG-IGA. The TTG-IGA test is considered to be the centerpiece of celiac disease antibody testing. The DGP-IGP test which was your positive one is a little less specific for celiac disease but is often helpful in the situation where people are IGA deficient or have been on a reduced gluten diet.

I would also note that the pathology report stated you were negative for "adenoma/dysplasia or malignancy". In other words, no sign of cancer.

You could also be looking at NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease but does not damage the villous lining of the small bowel. It is 10x more common than celiac disease but there is no test for it yet. celiac disease must first be ruled out. Both conditions require lifelong abstinence from gluten.

What symptoms are you experiencing that motivated you to get checked for celiac disease?

Edited by trents
Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. 

 

 

  • Solution
Wheatwacked Veteran
21 hours ago, abtwin26 said:

My doctor said that is also a positive for Celiac and said I should continue on a gluten free diet. 

 

21 hours ago, abtwin26 said:

So, am I truly Celiac and should I be on a strict diet?

Yes. And also assume you have vitamin deficiencies.

21 hours ago, abtwin26 said:

B. Antrum, biopsy: Chemical/reactive gastropathy; mild chronic
gastritis; intestinal metaplasia; consistent with atrophic/autoimmune
gastritis.

Gastric metaplasia: a frequently overlooked feature of duodenal biopsy specimens in untreated celiac disease

abtwin26 Newbie

Thank you for all the help.  I did have 6 blood tests in total, 4 negative and 2 positives.  I did try and look at the article noted for blood tests results, but just could not understand it.  The last response was what I was looking for and made sense to me.  Seems as Celiac is not such a cut and dry diagnoses.  Lots to learn and thank you again.  

trents Grand Master
(edited)

If you had four positive out of six celiac antibody tests and there was inflammation in your duodenum as the pathology report stated, I would say that is pretty conclusive for celiac disease. You may have caught it early enough before villi blunting was happening.

Edited by trents
abtwin26 Newbie

Thanks Trents!  To the recipe area for me:)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,695
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    NadiaH
    Newest Member
    NadiaH
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Grahamsnaturalworld
      Where can I find a gastro in adelaide who can diagnose refractory celiac disease have seen 3 so far and don't understand the most obvious question, why my celiac symptoms did not resolve on a gluten free diet the symptoms just got worse as it is attacking my nervous system. 
    • ShariW
      I recently traveled to Spain and Portugal. I was with a tour group, they knew I needed to be gluten-free and made sure the kitchens preparing the group meals were aware. But just in case, I took Gliadin-X with me and took it for every evening meal - and most other meals. The one time I got glutened was from lunch early in the trip - had to be from cross-contamination. I had not taken Gliadin-X before that meal, which made for a pretty miserable day. Learned my lesson... 😞 
    • Hummer01
      Hi trents, thanks for the response.  The 2nd opinion doctor said that if my CRP is still elevated at that time, he would advise me to look at Crohns/UC or another autoimmune issue. The colonoscopy I had this year seemed to rule those 2 out for now so he still believed celiac may explain it. No previous doctors have suggested any explanation for it even after calling to tell me it was a concerning result.  I guess it feels tough knowing I have positive blood testing, permissive genetics, and visible duodenum changes... and somehow it's NCGS instead of celiac. I'm still surprised the biopsies came back negative when the doctor was so sure they would be positive.
    • trents
      "He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac." But with if the elevated CRP levels are caused by some other inflammatory process going on in your body? "She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate." Totally wrong! This is a highly accurate test for celiac disease, that requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests. It is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals with the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the sensitivity is generally very high, ranging from 90% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition. The specificity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the specificity is also high, typically around 95% to 100%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition. Taken from the following article: Looking at the whole picture, I am wondering if you are transitioning from NCGS to celiac disease. Some experts in the gluten disorder field believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • Hummer01
      Hi all, just wanted to post an update.  I have been gluten free for about 1.5 months now and seeing improvement already in the bathroom.  Recently I had a visit with another GI doctor for a 2nd opinion. He said that while my blood tests and scope are not a "slam dunk" for celiac, he believes it's more likely than not that I have it. His advice was to stay with a celiac-level gluten free diet (no CC) for 6-12 months then retest to make sure TTG-IGA is still negative. He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac.  Today I had a follow up with the original GI that performed the scope. She is confident it is NCGS and says I can still have gluten sometimes. When I asked about the visible duodenum damage, she said it is just "irritation" from gluten because the biopsies were negative. She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate."  I guess I'm having trouble reconciling the totally different advice from these 2 GI's. I want to believe the new doctor more at this point because what he said just makes more sense to me, and he gave an actionable timeline for possible next steps. Feeling lost and disappointed at this point and wanted to write it down here in case anyone has input. Thank you.   
×
×
  • Create New...